Dergiler / Turkish Journal of Biology / 2021 / Cilt: 45 - Sayı: 2

Prediction of host-pathogen protein interactions by extended network model

Sayfa
138–148
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-17
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Empirical results showed that integrating the host andpathogen interactions yields better performance consistently in almost all experiments.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Knowledge of the pathogen-host interactions between the species is essentialin order to develop a solution strategy againstinfectious diseases.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The main scope ofthis paper is integrating the known protein interactions between thehost and pathogen organisms to improve the prediction success rateof unknown pathogen-host interactions.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Empirical results showed that integrating the host andpathogen interactions yields better performance consistently in almost all experiments.
🔬Tür:Modelleme & Sayısal Simülasyon
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Knowledge of the pathogen-host interactions between the species is essentialin order to develop a solution strategy againstinfectious diseases. In vitro methods take extended periods of time to detect interactions and provide very few of the possible interactionpairs. Hence, modelling interactions between proteins has necessitated the development of computational methods. The main scope ofthis paper is integrating the known protein interactions between thehost and pathogen organisms to improve the prediction success rateof unknown pathogen-host interactions. Thus, the truepositive rate of the predictions was expected to increase.In order to perform thisstudy extensively, encoding methods and learning algorithms of several proteins were tested. Along with human as the host organism,two different pathogen organisms were used in the experiments. For each combination of protein-encoding and prediction method,both the original prediction algorithms were tested using only pathogen-host interactions and the same methodwas testedagain afterintegrating the known protein interactions within each organism. The effect of merging the networks of pathogen-host interactions ofdifferent species on the prediction performance of state-of-the-art methods was also observed. Successwas measured in terms of Matthews correlation coefficient, precision, recall, F1 score, and accuracy metrics. Empirical results showed that integrating the host andpathogen interactions yields better performance consistently in almost all experiments.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

GÖK, M., KÖSESOY, İ., KAHVECİ, T. (2022). Prediction of host-pathogen protein interactions by extended network model. Turkish Journal of Biology, Cilt: 45 - Sayı: 2, 138–148. https://ajindex.com/articles/600115

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (10)

  1. Baldi P, Brunak S (2001). Bioinformatics: the Machine Learning Approach. Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press.
  2. Bhargava N, Sharma G, Bhargava R, Mathuria M (2013). Decision tree analysis on j48 algorithm for data mining. Proceedings of International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer Science and Software Engineering 3 (6). Bhasin M, Raghava GPS (2004). Classification of nuclear receptors based on amino acid composition and dipeptide composition. Journal of Biological Chemistry 279 (22): 23262-23266. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M401932200. Bock JR, Gough DA (2001). Predicting protein--protein interactions from primary structure. Bioinformatics 17 (5): 455-460.
  3. Bock JR, Gough DA (2003). Whole-proteome interaction mining. Bioinformatics 19 (1): 125-134.
  4. Breiman L (2001). Random forests. Machine Learning 45 (1): 5-32. doi: 10.1023/A:1010933404324. Calderone A, Licata L, Cesareni G (2014). VirusMentha: a new resource for virus-host protein interactions. Nucleic Acids Research 43 (D1): D588-D592. doi: 10.1093/nar/gku830. Chen J, Liu H, Yang J,Chou KC (2007). Prediction of linear B-cell epitopes using amino acid pair antigenicity scale. Amino Acids 33 (3): 423-428. doi: 10.1007/s00726-006-0485-9.
  5. Cleary JG, Trigg LE (1995). K*: an instance-based learner using an entropic distance measure. In: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Machine Learning; Tahoe City, CA, USA. pp. 108-114.
  6. Dasarathy BV (1991). Nearest neighbor (NN) norms: NN pattern classification techniques. IEEE Computer Society Tutorial. Davis J, Goadrich M (2006). The relationship between precision-recall and ROC curves. In: Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Machine Learning; Pittsburgh, PA, USA. pp. 233-240.
  7. De Bodt S, Proost S, Vandepoele K, Rouzé P, De Peer Y (2009). Predicting protein-protein interactions in Arabidopsis thaliana through integration of orthology, gene ontology and coexpression. BMC Genomics 10 (1): 288. Durmuş Tekir S, Çakır T, Ardıç E, Sayılırbaş AS, Konuk G et al. (2013). PHISTO: pathogen--host interaction search tool. Bioinformatics 29 (10): 1357-1358.
  8. Dyer MD, Murali TM, Sobral BW (2011). Supervised learning and prediction of physical interactions between human and HIV proteins. Infection, Genetics and Evolution 11 (5): 917-923.
  9. Friedman N, Geiger D, Goldszmidt M (1997). Bayesian network classifiers. Machine Learning 29 (2-3): 131-163.
  10. Guirimand T, Delmotte S, Navratil V (2015). VirHostNet 2.0: surfing on the web of virus/host molecular interactions data. Nu