Dergiler / Teknik Dergi / 2022 / Cilt: 33 - Sayı: 4

Evaluation of Stripping Problem in Terms of Additive Types and Ratios in Asphalt Pavements

Sayfa
12183–12202
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Additives remained functional and maintain their mechanisms of benefit, especially in the event of a high degree of damage.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Stripping in asphalt mixtures is the one of foremost distress mechanisms.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:To prevent stripping, fatty acids (AS) and hydrated lime (HL) additives are often used as anti-stripping additives.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Additives remained functional and maintain their mechanisms of benefit, especially in the event of a high degree of damage.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Asphalt pavement · stripping · modified Lottman test

Özet

Stripping in asphalt mixtures is the one of foremost distress mechanisms. To prevent stripping, fatty acids (AS) and hydrated lime (HL) additives are often used as anti-stripping additives. The determination of the correct usage ratios of these additives and the storage stability of bitumen constitutes important research topics for anti-stripping additive applications. Three surfactants and hydrated lime were used in three ratios to evaluate the effect of additive ratio and type. Indirect tensile strength (ITS) values obtained from samples with one and three cycle modified Lottman conditioning and indirect tensile strength ratios (ITSRs) were interpreted in the context of water damage. The load-carrying capacity of the conditioned mixtures increased significantly. Even if the degree of damage was considerably increased at the end of three cycles, the integrity of the mixtures was maintained. Both AS and HL significantly increased water damage resistance. Modified Lottman conditioning has an observable level of damage. Additives remained functional and maintain their mechanisms of benefit, especially in the event of a high degree of damage.

Abstract

Stripping in asphalt mixtures is the one of foremost distress mechanisms. To prevent stripping, fatty acids (AS) and hydrated lime (HL) additives are often used as anti-stripping additives. The determination of the correct usage ratios of these additives and the storage stability of bitumen constitutes important research topics for anti-stripping additive applications. Three surfactants and hydrated lime were used in three ratios to evaluate the effect of additive ratio and type. Indirect tensile strength (ITS) values obtained from samples with one and three cycle modified Lottman conditioning and indirect tensile strength ratios (ITSRs) were interpreted in the context of water damage. The load-carrying capacity of the conditioned mixtures increased significantly. Even if the degree of damage was considerably increased at the end of three cycles, the integrity of the mixtures was maintained. Both AS and HL significantly increased water damage resistance. Modified Lottman conditioning has an observable level of damage. Additives remained functional and maintain their mechanisms of benefit, especially in the event of a high degree of damage.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

İSKENDER, E., AKSOY, A., ŞENGÜL, C. E. (2022). Evaluation of Stripping Problem in Terms of Additive Types and Ratios in Asphalt Pavements. Teknik Dergi, Cilt: 33 - Sayı: 4, 12183–12202. https://ajindex.com/articles/596550

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (13)

  1. Diab, A., You, Z. Development of a realistic conditioning and evaluation system to study moisture damage of asphalt materials. In Airfield and Highway Pavement 2013: Sustainable and Efficient Pavements, 1008-1017, 2013.
  2. Solaimanian, M., Harvey, J., Tahmoressi, M., Tandon, V. Test methods to predict moisture sensitivity of hot-mix asphalt pavements. In Transportation research board national seminar. San Diego, California, 77-110, 2003.
  3. Al-Qadi, I.L., Abuawad, I.M., Dhasmana, H., Coenen, A.R., Trepanier, J.S. Effects of Various Asphalt Binder Additives/Modifiers on Moisture-Susceptible Asphaltic Mixtures Research Report FHWA-ICT-14-004,
  4. University of Illinois, Urbana, 2014.
  5. Caro, S., Masad, E., Bhasin, A., Little D.N. Moisture susceptibility of asphalt mixtures, Part 2: Characterization and modeling. Int J Pavement Eng 9(2), 99–114, 2008.
  6. Abuawad, I. M., Al-Qadi, I. L., Trepanier, J. S. Mitigation of moisture damage in asphalt concrete: Testing techniques and additives/modifiers effectiveness. Construction and Building Materials, 84, 437-443, 2015.
  7. Sebaaly, P. E., Hitti, E., Weitzel, D. Effectiveness of lime in hot-mix asphalt pavements. Transportation Research Record, 1832(1), 34-41, 2003.
  8. Wasiuddin, N. M., Fogle, C. M., Zaman, M. M., O'Rear, E. A. Effect of antistrip additives on surface free energy characteristics of asphalt binders for moisture-induced damage potential. Journal of testing and evaluation, 35(1), 36-44, 2007.
  9. Airey, G. D., Collop, A. C., Zoorob, S. E., Elliott, R. C. The influence of aggregate, filler and bitumen on asphalt mixture moisture damage. Construction and building materials, 22(9), 2015-2024, 2008.
  10. Cui, S., Blackman, B. R., Kinloch, A. J., Taylor, A. C. Durability of asphalt mixtures: Effect of aggregate type and adhesion promoters. International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives, 54, 100-111, 2014.
  11. Epps, J., Berger, E., Anagnos, J. N. Moisture Sensitivity of Asphalt Pavements: Treatments. In A National Seminar, Transportation Research Board, San Diego, California, 77-177, 2013. Júnior, J. L. L., Babadopulos, L. F., Soares, J. B. Moisture-induced damage resistance, stiffness and fatigue life of asphalt mixtures with different aggregate-binder adhesion properties. Construction and Building Materials, 216, 166-175, 2019.
  12. Solaimanian, M., Bonaquist, R. F., Tandon, V. Improved conditioning and testing procedures for HMA moisture susceptibility (Vol. 589). Transportation Research Board, 2007.
  13. Xiao, F., Amirkhanian, S. N. Effects of li