KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 24 - Sayı: 3

Design of a Nozzle-Height Control System Using a Permanent Magnet Tubular Linear Synchronous Motor

Ali Fuat BOZ
Ahmet ILICA
Sayfa
374–385
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-17
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Under test conditions it was found that the developed system keeps the distance between differently sized plants and the nozzle at the set point with minimum error.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:In agricultural spraying, keeping the spray at the correct height reduces pesticide drift and provides uniformly distributed pesticide accumulation on the target plant.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:According to the experimental results, the nozzle height coefficient of variation (CV) value decreased from 16.77% to 5.17%, while the uniformity of distribution in the forward direction increased from 56.57% to 86.11% at 12 kmh-1 under field conditions.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Under test conditions it was found that the developed system keeps the distance between differently sized plants and the nozzle at the set point with minimum error.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

In agricultural spraying, keeping the spray at the correct height reduces pesticide drift and provides uniformly distributed pesticide accumulation on the target plant. In this study, an agricultural nozzle-height control test system was developed using a permanent magnet tubular linear synchronous motor (PMTLSM) that can adjust the height between the spraying nozzle and the plant. The developed system was experimentally tested in the laboratory environment and under field conditions. According to the experimental results, the nozzle height coefficient of variation (CV) value decreased from 16.77% to 5.17%, while the uniformity of distribution in the forward direction increased from 56.57% to 86.11% at 12 kmh-1 under field conditions. Under test conditions it was found that the developed system keeps the distance between differently sized plants and the nozzle at the set point with minimum error.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

BOZ, A. F., ILICA, A. (2022). Design of a Nozzle-Height Control System Using a Permanent Magnet Tubular Linear Synchronous Motor. Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 24 - Sayı: 3, 374–385. https://ajindex.com/articles/594844

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (10)

  1. Zaman Q U, Schumann A W & Hostler H K (2007). Quantifying sources of error in ultrasonic measurements of citrus orchards. Applied Engineering in Agriculture 23(4): 449-453 Yoshida K & Maybank J (1971). Effect of the dynamic stability of spray booms on the dispersion characteristics of a flat fan spray. The Journal of Canadian Agricultural Engineering 13(1): 23-28
  2. Womac A R, Etheridge R, Seibert A, Hogan D & Ray S (2001). Sprayer speed and venturi-nozzle effects on broadcast application uniformity. Transactions of the ASAE 44(6): 1437-1444
  3. Wolf T M, Liu S H, Caldwell B C & Hsiao A I (1997). Calibration of greenhouse spray chambers: The importance of dynamic nozzle patternation. Weed Technology 11(3): 428-435
  4. Wilson J, Nowatzki J & Hofman V (2008). Selecting driftreducing nozzles. south dakota cooperative extension service, FS 919, Rev. 6/08 Wen P & Kidd J G (2005). Electronic height indicator for agricultural machines. Australian Journal of Electrical and Electronics Engineering 2(1): 13-19
  5. Wang L, Xiong C, Wu Y & Gan Z (2012). Study on iron loss in two kinds of moving-magnet linear motors. In: Proceeding of the International Compressor Engineering Conference, 16-19
  6. July, Purdue University, West Lafayette, USA, pp. 2235 Wang L, Zhang N, Slocombe J W & Kuhlman D K (1993). Measurement of spray distribution uniformity for agricultural nozzles using spectral analysis. In: P D Berger, B N Devisetty & F R Hall (Eds), Pesticide Formulation and application systems, American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, pp. 265-279 Sun J & Miao Y (2011). Modeling and simulation of the agricultural sprayer boom leveling system: Measuring Technology and Mechatronics Automation, IEEE Conference, 6-7
  7. January, Shanghai, pp. 613-618
  8. Sama M P, Evans J T, Turer A P & Dasika S S (2016). As-applied estimation of volumetric flow rate from a single sprayer nozzle series using water-sensitive spray cards. Transactions of the ASABE 59(3): 861- 869 Salyani M, Zhu H, Sweeb R D & Pai N (2013). Assessment of spray distribution with water-sensitive paper. Agricultural Engineering International: CIGR Journal 15(2): 101-111
  9. Ramon H, Missotten B & Baerdemaeker J D (1997). Spray boom motions and spray distribution: part 2, experimental validation of the mathematical relation and simulation results. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research 66(1): 31-39
  10. Qasem J R (2011). Herbicides Applications: Problems And Considerations. In: A Kortekamp (Eds), Herbicides and Environment, InTech, C