KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 1

Introducing Diffrent Cherry Cultivars to Inner and Crossover Areas

Hakkı KOÇAL
İsmail DEMİRTAŞ
İsmail ŞEVİK
Fatma Pınar ÖZTÜRK
Ömer Faruk KARAMÜRSEL
Özlem CENGİZ
Hasan Cumhur SARISU
Sayfa
11–20
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-17
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Bernard, mid-season cultivar Summit and late season cultivar 0900 Ziraat gave the biggest fruits.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:This study was carried out to evaluate quality, yield and phenology of some sweet cherry cultivars with diffrentmaturation periods in Isparta-Egirdir conditions.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The study was carried out between 2000 and 2011, on Veysel, PrécoceBernard, Star, Venus, Mechlain Haimer, Summit, Techlovan, Fercer Arcina, Sylvia, Noire de Meched, Oktavia, Belge,0900 Ziraat, Kordia, and Ferbolus.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Bernard, mid-season cultivar Summit and late season cultivar 0900 Ziraat gave the biggest fruits.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2000 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

This study was carried out to evaluate quality, yield and phenology of some sweet cherry cultivars with diffrentmaturation periods in Isparta-Egirdir conditions. The study was carried out between 2000 and 2011, on Veysel, PrécoceBernard, Star, Venus, Mechlain Haimer, Summit, Techlovan, Fercer Arcina, Sylvia, Noire de Meched, Oktavia, Belge,0900 Ziraat, Kordia, and Ferbolus. Venus, Bernard, Techlovan and Star cultivars were identifid as the earliest blooming.Oktavia, Belge, Kordia and 0900 Ziraat cultivars were found to be the latest blooming cultivars. Generally; Veysel,Bernard and Star come to harvest maturity fist. Venus, Mechlain Haimer, Summit, Techlovan, Fercer Arcina, Sylviawere found to be middle season cultivars, while N. De Meched, Oktavia, Belge, 0900 Ziraat, Kordia and Ferbolus werefound to be the latest. Veysel early cherry cultivar were determined to be the most productive one, while late cultivar N.De Meched and mid-season cultivar Techlovan were also found to be very effient. In terms of fruit sizes; early sweetcherry cultivar P. Bernard, mid-season cultivar Summit and late season cultivar 0900 Ziraat gave the biggest fruits.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

KOÇAL, H., DEMİRTAŞ, İ., ŞEVİK, İ., ÖZTÜRK, F. P., KARAMÜRSEL, Ö. F., CENGİZ, Ö., SARISU, H. C. (2022). Introducing Diffrent Cherry Cultivars to Inner and Crossover Areas. Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 1, 11–20. https://ajindex.com/articles/594814

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (9)

  1. Beyhan N & Karakaş B (2009). Investigation of the fertilization biology of some sweet cherry cultivars grown in The Central Northern Anatolian Region of Turkey. Scientia Horticulturae 121(3): 320-326 Chapman P J & Catlin G A (1976). Growth stages in fruit trees-from dormant to fruit set. Plant Science, New York’s Food and Life Sciences Bulletin 58: 1-12 Choi C & Andersen R L (2001). Variable fruit set in self-fertile sweet cherry. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 81: 753-760
  2. Crisosto C H, Crisosto G M & Metheney P (2003). Consumer acceptance of ‘Brooks’ and ‘Bing’ cherries is mainly dependent on fruit SSC and visual skin color. Postharvest Biology and Technology 28: 159- 167 Drake S R & Fellman J K (1987). Indicators of maturity and storage quality of Rainier sweet cherry Indicateurs de maturité et d’aptitude à l’entreposage des cerises douces Rainier. HortScience 22(2): 283-285 Drake S R & Elfving D C (2002). Indicators of maturity and storage quality of ‘Lapins’ sweet cherry. HortTechnology 12(4): 687-690
  3. Ekinci N, Delice A, Gür E & Özdüven F (2007). Değişik dozlarda kalsiyum uygulamalarının 0900 Ziraat kiraz çeşidinin kalite kriterleri üzerine etkileri. Türkiye V. Ulusal Bahçe Bitkileri Kongresi Bildiriler: 4-7
  4. Eylül, Erzurum, s. 464-468 Fadón E, Herrero M & Rodrigo J (2015). Flower development in sweet cherry framed in the BBCH scale. Scientia Horticulturae 192: 141-147
  5. FAO (2015). Food and agriculture organization of the United Nations. Visited on February of 2017. http:// faostat.fao.org Fischer R R, Von Elbe J H, Schuler R T, Bruhn H D & Moore J D (1996). Some physical properties of sour cherries. Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers pp. 175-179
  6. Gonçalves B, Moutinho-Pereira J, Santos A, Silva A P, Bacelar E, Correia C & Rosa E (2006). Scionrootstock interaction affcts the physiology and fruit quality of sweet cherry. Tree Physiology 26(1): 93- 104 Grzyb Z S & Rozpara E (2009). Effct of various rootstocks and tree spacing on the size of Vanda. Acta Horticulturae 814: 401-404
  7. Ipek A, Gulen H, Akçay M E, Ipek M, Ergin S & Eris A (2011). Determination of self-incompatibility groups of Sweet Cherry Genotypes from Turkey. Genetics and Molecular Research 10(1): 253-260
  8. Kader A A (1983). Post-harvest quality maintenance of fruits and vegetables in developing countries. PostHavest Physiology and Crop Production, Plenum, New York, pp. 455-470
  9. Kappel F, Fisher-Fleming B & Hogue E (1996). Fruit characteristics and sens