Dergiler / Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 4

Comparison of Ethylene Sensitivity of Three Tomato Cultivars From Different Tomato Types and Effects of Ethylene on Postharvest Performance

Sayfa
476–483
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-17
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Untreated beefsteak tomatoes exhibited maximal postharvest quality compared to other treatments after 35 days cold storage and shelf life.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The aim of study was to investigate ethylene sensitivity of different types of tomatoes and the effects of ethylene on their postharvest performance.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:For that purpose, beefsteak, heirloom and cluster types of tomato fruit were harvested at the breaker maturity stage and divided into two groups one of which was treated with 150 μL L−1 ethylene and the other was untreated for comparison.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Untreated beefsteak tomatoes exhibited maximal postharvest quality compared to other treatments after 35 days cold storage and shelf life.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:cold storage · ethylene · Quality

Abstract

The aim of study was to investigate ethylene sensitivity of different types of tomatoes and the effects of ethylene on their postharvest performance. For that purpose, beefsteak, heirloom and cluster types of tomato fruit were harvested at the breaker maturity stage and divided into two groups one of which was treated with 150 μL L−1 ethylene and the other was untreated for comparison. Ethylene treated and untreated fruit were stored at 12 °C and 90+5% relative humidity for 35 days and subsamples removed every 7 days for postharvest quality analysis. After each removal time, fruit were kept at 20 °C for 3 days in order to determine shelf life performance. Ethylene treatment lead to increase respiration rate, ethylene production, weight loss but decreased fruit firmness in all tested tomato cultivars. Minimum ethylene production and respiration rate occurred in untreated beefsteak tomatoes. At the end of cold storage and shelf life period, the highest L* values and fruit firmness were recorded for control beefsteak tomatoes. The conclusion drawn from this experiment was that the cluster type of tomatoes was more sensitive, while beefsteak type of tomatoes was found to be less sensitive to ethylene treatment as they had the highest and lowest amount of ethylene productions respectively. Untreated beefsteak tomatoes exhibited maximal postharvest quality compared to other treatments after 35 days cold storage and shelf life.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ALI, Q., KURUBAŞ, M. S., ERKAN, M. (2022). Comparison of Ethylene Sensitivity of Three Tomato Cultivars From Different Tomato Types and Effects of Ethylene on Postharvest Performance. Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 4, 476–483. https://ajindex.com/articles/594702

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (7)

  1. References Akbudak B, Akbudak N, Seniz V & Eris A (2007). Sequential treatments of hot water and modified atmosphere packaging in cherry tomatoes. Journal of Food Quality 30(6): 896-910
  2. Baldwin E A (2004). Ethylene and postharvest commodities. HortScience 39(7): 1538-1540. Boe A A & Salunkhe D K (1967). Ripening tomatoes: Ethylene, oxygen, and light treatments. Economic Botany 21(4): 312-319 Camelo A F L & Gomez P A (2004). Comparison of color indexes for tomato ripening. Horticultura Brasileira 22(3): 534-537
  3. Cantwell M (2010). Optimum Procedures for Ripening Tomatoes. In: Fruit Ripening and Ethylene Management, J.T. Thompson and C. Crisosto (eds.), UC Postharvest Horticulture Series 9: 106-116
  4. Chomchalow S, El Assi N M, Sargent S A & Brecht J K (2002). Fruit maturity and timing of ethylene treatment affect storage performance of green tomatoes at chilling and nonchilling temperatures. HortTechnology 12(1): 104-114 Cheng T S & Shewfelt R L (1988). Effect of chilling exposure of tomatoes during subsequent ripening. Journal of Food Science 53(4): 1160-1162 Dávila-Avi˜na J E J, Villa-Rodríguez J, Cruz-Valenzuela R, Rodríguez-Armenta M, Espino-Díaz M, Ayala-Zavala J F, Olivas-Orozco G I, Heredia B & González- Aguilar G (2011). Effect of edible coatings, storage time and maturity stage on overall quality of tomato fruit. American Journal of Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6(1): 162–171
  5. De Wild H P J, Balk P A, Fernandes E C A & Peppelenbos H W (2005). The action site of carbon dioxide in relation to inhibition of ethylene production in tomato fruit. Postharvest Biology and Technology 36 (3):272-280 Dhall R K & Singh P (2013). Effect of ethephon and ethylene gas on ripening and quality of tomato (Solanum Lycopersicum L.) during cold storage. Journal of Nutrition and Food Sciences 3 (6): 1-7
  6. Dong L, Zhou H W, Sonego L, Lers A & Lurie S (2001). Ethylene involvement in the cold storage disorder of ‘Flavortop’ nectarine. Postharvest Biology and Technology 23(2): 105-115
  7. Elmi F, Pradas I, Tosetti R, Cools K & Terry LA (2017). Effect of ethylene on postharvest strawberry fruit tissue biochemistry. Acta Horticulturae 1156: 667-672 Erturk YE & Cirka M (2015). Production and marketing of tomatoes in Turkey and North East Anadolu region. Yuzuncu Yıl University Journal of Agricultural Sciences 25(1): 84-97 (Original article in Turkish) Fagundes C, Moraes K, Perez-Gago MB, Palou L, Maraschin M & Monteiro AR (2015). Effect of active modified atmosphere and cold storage