Dergiler / Southern Clinics of Istanbul Eurasia / 2022 / Cilt: 33 - Sayı: 1

Evaluation of Surgical Interventions in Patients with Diabetic Foot Ulcer and Infection Assessed in the Chronic Wound Council Between 2016-2017

Sayfa
81–85
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

We consider that this is due to patients who presented late, who had higher grades of Wagner wound stages, who had osteomyelitis, who had vascular problems and were referred to our center for decision of amputation.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Objective: Diabetes mellitus is a common health issue with an increasingly rampant incidence all over the world.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Diabetic foot ulcers raise morbidity, reduce the quality of life, prolong hospital stay, and cause a high rate of lower extremity amputation.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:We consider that this is due to patients who presented late, who had higher grades of Wagner wound stages, who had osteomyelitis, who had vascular problems and were referred to our center for decision of amputation.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2016–2017 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Objective: Diabetes mellitus is a common health issue with an increasingly rampant incidence all over the world. Diabetic foot ulcers raise morbidity, reduce the quality of life, prolong hospital stay, and cause a high rate of lower extremity amputation. Our aim in this study is to evaluate the patients presented to the hospital with the diabetic foot diagnosis. Methods: 147 diabetic foot patients were evaluated retrospectively in the chronic wound council between 2016–2017 at our hospital. Wagner was used for wound classification, whereas Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) was for infection classification. Results: Evaluating the cases according to the Wagner classification, 1 patient was observed to be on stage 1, 19 were on stage 2, 58 were on stage 3, 58 were on stage 4, 11 were on stage 5. Patients on stage 3 and above accounted for 86.4% of all cases. 66 patients (45%) underwent minor amputation, whereas 18 (21%) were below-knee amputation and 2 (1%) were above-knee amputation. 44 patients recovered with debridement and wound care. Conclusion: Lower extremity ulcers and infections in diabetic patients are one of the most common causes of hospitalization and non-traumatic amputation in diabetic patients. The amputation rate, which was determined as 58.5% in our study, is higher compared to similar studies. We consider that this is due to patients who presented late, who had higher grades of Wagner wound stages, who had osteomyelitis, who had vascular problems and were referred to our center for decision of amputation.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

TAŞDEMİR, Z., FİLİNTE, G., ALADAĞ, N., GÜMÜŞ, S. G., AK, Ö., GÜMÜŞ, T. (2022). Evaluation of Surgical Interventions in Patients with Diabetic Foot Ulcer and Infection Assessed in the Chronic Wound Council Between 2016-2017. Southern Clinics of Istanbul Eurasia, Cilt: 33 - Sayı: 1, 81–85. https://ajindex.com/articles/592724

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (15)

  1. Boulton AJ, Vileikyte L, Ragnarson-Tennvall G, Apelqvist J. The global burden of diabetic foot disease. Lancet 2005;366:1719–24
  2. Reiber GE, Bowker JH, Pfefier MA. Epidemiology of foot ulcers and amputation in the diabetic foot. In: The diabetic foot. 6th ed. St Louis: Mo Inc; 2001. p. 1332
  3. Jeffcoate WJ, Harding KG: Diabetic foot ulcers. Lancet 2003;361:1545–51
  4. Wutschert R, Bounameaux H. Determination of amputation level in ischemic limbs. Diabetes Care 1997;20:1315–8
  5. Prompers L, Schaper N, Apelqvist J, Edmonds M, Jude E, Mauricio D, et al. Prediction of outcome in individuals with diabetic foot ulcers: focus on the differences between individuals with and without peripheral arterial disease. The EURODIALE Study. Diabetologia 2008;51:747–55
  6. Saltoglu N, Ergonul O, Tulek N, Yemisen M, Kadanali A, Karagoz G, et al; Turkish Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Diabetic Foot Infections Study Group. Influence of multidrug resistant organisms on the outcome of diabetic foot infection. Int J Infect Dis 2018;70:10–4
  7. Hatipoglu M, Mutluoglu M, Turhan V, Uzun G, Lipsky BA, TurkDay Study Group. Causative pathogens and antibiotic resistance in diabetic foot infections: A prospective multi-center study. J Diabetes Complications 2016;30:910–6
  8. Edmonds ME, Blundell MP, Morris ME, Thomas EM, Cotton LT, Watkins PJ. Improved survival of the diabetic foot: the role of a specialized foot clinic. Q J Med 1986;60:763–71
  9. Yesil S, Akinci B, Yener S, Bayraktar F, Karabay O, Havitcioglu H, et al. Predictors of amputation in diabetics with foot ulcer: single center experience in a large Turkish cohort. Hormones (Athens) 2009;8:286–95
  10. Forde H, Wrigley S, O’Murchadha LT, Cusack L, Casserly S, Moneley D, et al. Five-year outcomes of patients attending a diabetic foot clinic in a tertiary referral centre. Ir J Med Sci 2020;189:511–5
  11. Alexiadou K, Doupis J. Management of diabetic foot ulcers. Diabetes Ther 2012;3:4
  12. Weisz G, Ramon Y, Melamed Y. Treatment of the diabetic foot by hyperbaric oxygen. Harefuah 1993;124:678–81, 740
  13. Doctor N, Pandya S, Supe A. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy in diabetic foot. J Postgrad Med 1992;38:112–4, 111
  14. Lehto S, Rönnemaa T, Pyörälä K, Laakso M. Risk factors predicting lower extremity amputations in patients with NIDDM. Diabetes Care 1996;19:607–12
  15. Bostanoğlu S, Erverdi N, Karabulut Z et al. Diyabetik ayak ve amputasyonu: risk faktörleri ve risk skorlamasının önemi. İnsizyon 2