Dergiler / Sakarya University Journal of Education / 2020 / Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 3

Analysis of Thesis in Turkey between the years 2008- 2020 on Mathematics Literacy

Sayfa
667–685
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

It was observed that quantitative screening method was used asthe research method most, and questionnaire / scale and tests were used as datacollection tools, and studies conducted with students and secondary school levelwere the majority.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:In recent years, the concept of mathematical literacy has become themain subject of studies on mathematics education.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:In the research, the postgraduate theses that werestudied on mathematics literacy between 2008 and 2019 and determined bypurposeful sampling method were analyzed.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:It was observed that quantitative screening method was used asthe research method most, and questionnaire / scale and tests were used as datacollection tools, and studies conducted with students and secondary school levelwere the majority.
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:2008 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

In recent years, the concept of mathematical literacy has become themain subject of studies on mathematics education. Although there are manygraduate theses on mathematics literacy in the current situation, no detailedanalysis of them has been found. The purpose of this work, what needs thequantity and quality of the arguments made on mathematics literacy in Turkeymeets the criteria, what kind of research is needed to reveal whether the analysisusing meta-synthesis method. In the research, the postgraduate theses that werestudied on mathematics literacy between 2008 and 2019 and determined bypurposeful sampling method were analyzed. The graduate theses examined in theresearch were obtained as a result of the search made in the database of theHigher Education Council (YÖK) National Thesis Scanning Center. This study islimited to 66 (51 master's and 15 doctoral) postgraduate theses that have beencompleted on literacy in the field of mathematics education until 2019. The dataobtained in the study were analyzed in terms of the university, years and type oftheses on mathematics literacy, sample characteristics, targeted purposes,methods used and data collection tools. The obtained data are shown with the helpof graphics and tables with frequency. It has been observed that the number ofmaster's and doctoral theses prepared since 2008 has increased, the number ofdoctoral theses is one-third of the number of master's theses and most of thetheses are exited from Uludağ University. In the study, it was determined thatmost of the theses were carried out to examine mathematical literacy in thecontext of PISA. It was observed that quantitative screening method was used asthe research method most, and questionnaire / scale and tests were used as datacollection tools, and studies conducted with students and secondary school levelwere the majority.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ARI, A. A., DEMİR, B. (2022). Analysis of Thesis in Turkey between the years 2008- 2020 on Mathematics Literacy. Sakarya University Journal of Education, Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 3, 667–685. https://ajindex.com/articles/590519

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (9)

  1. Altun, M. (2020). Matematik Okuryazarlığı El Kitabı: Yeni Nesil Soru Yazma ve Öğretim Düzenleme Teknikleri [Mathematical Literacy Handbook: Next Generation Question Writing and Instructional Editing Techniques]. Bursa: Aktüel Alfa Akademi Yayıncılık. Çepni, S. (2016). PISA ve TIMSS Mantığını ve Sorularını Anlama [Understanding PISA and TIMSS Logic and Questions]. Ankara:
  2. Pegem Akademi. Çalık, M., & Sözbilir, M. (2014). İçerik Analizinin Parametreleri [Parameters of Content Analysis]. Eğitim ve Bilim, 39 (174), 33-38.
  3. De Lange, J. (2003). Mathematics for literacy. B. L. Madison ve L. A. Steen (Eds.), Quantitative literacy: Why numeracy matters for schools and colleges. Princeton, NJ: The National Council on Education and the Disciplines, 75-89.
  4. Dinçer, S. (2018). Content Analysis in for Educational Science Research: Meta-Analysis, MetaSynthesis, and Descriptive Content Analysis. Bartın Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 7(1), 176-190.
  5. Doyle, K. (2007).
  6. The Teacher, The Tasks: Their Role in Students? Mathematical Literacy. In Watson, Janeand Beswick, Kim, Eds. Proceedings 30th annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia - Mathematics: Essential Research, Essential Practice, 246-254.
  7. Durlak, J.A. (1995), Reading and understanding multivariate statistics. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. EARGED, (2005). PISA 2003 Project National Final Report. Ankara: MEB-Education Research and Development Department. Edge, D. L. (2009). Math Literacy: The Relationship of Algebra, Gender, Ethnicity, Socioeconomic Status, and Avid Enrollment With High School Math Course Completion and College Readiness. University of North Texas. Access address:https://search.proquest.com/openview/0a1145a64a709990201873a68e6fd310/1?pqorigsite=gscholar&cbl=18750&diss=y.
  8. Fırat, İ. (2019). Türkiye’de Matematik Okuryazarlık İle İlgili 2020 Yılına Kadar Yapılan Çalışmaların Doküman Analizi Yöntemiyle İncelenmesi [Investigation By The Method Of Document Analysis Of Studies On Mathematics Literacy In Turkey Until 2020]. (Master Thesis). Accessed from YÖK Thesis database (Thesis number: 620110). Graven, M., & Venkatakrishnan, H. (2006). Emerging successes and tensions in the implementation of Mathematical Literacy. Learning and Teaching Mathematics, 4, 5-9.
  9. Oğuz Haçat, S., & Demı̇r, F.B. (2018). Sosyal Bilgiler Eğitimi Üzerine Yapılan Doktora Tezlerinin Değerlendirilmesi (2002-2018) [Evaluatıon Of The Doctoral Dissertations Conducted On Social St