KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Sakarya University Journal of Education / 2021 / Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 3

The Acceptance and Use of an Online Exam System by Online Learners: Implementation of the UTAUT Model*

Murat ÇINAR
Gülgün AFACAN ADANIR
Sayfa
412–430
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

However, according to the results, effort expectancy and social influence were not significantly related to online learners’ acceptance of an online exam system.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The achievement of technology depends heavily on its actual use by the target users.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The study was conducted at a state university in Turkey during the fall semester of 2019-2020.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:However, according to the results, effort expectancy and social influence were not significantly related to online learners’ acceptance of an online exam system.
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:2019-2020 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

The achievement of technology depends heavily on its actual use by the target users. Similarly, the success of online exam systems also depends on the acceptance of target learners. In this regard, the purpose of this study was to investigate the factors that affect the acceptance of an online exam system by online learners. The study was conducted at a state university in Turkey during the fall semester of 2019-2020. A total of 277 online learners participated in this study. The research model of the study was based on the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT). Participants’ data were collected through a survey, which included items of performance expectancy, effort expectancy, facilitating conditions, and social influence factors from the UTAUT model. Structural equation modelling (SEM) analysis was used to investigate the structure of the research model. The SEM results revealed that performance expectancy and facilitating conditions were positively related to online learners’ acceptance of an online exam system. However, according to the results, effort expectancy and social influence were not significantly related to online learners’ acceptance of an online exam system.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ÇINAR, M., ADANIR, G. A. (2022). The Acceptance and Use of an Online Exam System by Online Learners: Implementation of the UTAUT Model*. Sakarya University Journal of Education, Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 3, 412–430. https://ajindex.com/articles/590506

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (4)

  1. Afacan Adanır, G., İsmailova, R., Omuraliev, A., & Muhametjanova, G. (2020). Learners’ perceptions of online exams: A comparative study in Turkey and Kyrgyzstan. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 21(3), 1-17. doi: 10.19173/irrodl.v21i3.4679 Al-Mashaqbeh, I. F., & Al Hamad, A. (2010). Student's perception of an online exam within the Decision Support System Course at Al al Bayt University. In Proceedings Second International Conference on Computer Research and Development, ICCRD 2010 (pp. 131-135). IEEE, https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/5489480
  2. Alsadoon, H. (2017). Students' perceptions of e-assessment at Saudi Electronic University. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 16(1), 147-153. Retrieved from: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1124924.pdf
  3. Al Salmi, S., Al-Majeed, S., & Karam, J. (2019). Online exams for better students' performance. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Education, Teaching & Learning (ICE19New York Conference). Globalbizresearch, http://eprints.glos.ac.uk/6803/
  4. Arpaci, I. (2015). A comparative study of the effects of cultural differences on the adoption of mobile learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(4), 699-712. doi: 10.1111/bjet.12160 Cabı, E. (2016). Uzaktan eğitimde e-değerlendirme üzerine öğrenci algıları [The perception of students on e-assessment in distance education]. Journal of Higher Education & Science/Yüksekögretim ve Bilim Dergisi, 6(1), 94-101. doi:10.5961/jhes.2016.146. Davis, F. D., (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use and use acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-339. doi: 10.2307/249008 Dermo, J. (2009). e‐Assessment and the student learning experience: A survey of student perceptions of e‐assessment. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40(2), 203- 214. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2008.00915.x Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50. doi: 10.1177/002224378101800104 Granić, A., & Marangunić, N. (2019). Technology acceptance model in educational context: A systematic literature review. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(5), 2572- 2593. doi: 10.1111/bjet.12864 Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis. New York: Pearson. Hillier, M. (2014). The very idea of e-Exams: Student (pre) conception