KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Retina-Vitreus / 2022 / Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 3

Analysis of Retinal Vessel Density and Macular Flow Area in Diabetic and Healthy Participants Using Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography

Mehmet DEMİR
Dilek GUVEN
Selam Yekta SENDUL
Hakan KACAR
Gurcan Dogukan ARSLAN
Cetin AKPOLAT
Sayfa
220–225
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-17
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Results: The mean values of BCVA and CMT were 0.42±0.32 and 0.86±0.17 (p

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Purpose: To inspect the macular flow area, superficial and deep retinal vessel density measurements of optical coherence tomography (OCT) angiography (OCTA) in diabetic patients and healthy subjects.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Methods: This retrospectively reviewed, and the cross-sectional study included 64 right eyes of 64 diabetic patients (Diabetic group) and 60 right eyes of 60 healthy (Control group) subjects.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Results: The mean values of BCVA and CMT were 0.42±0.32 and 0.86±0.17 (p
🔬Tür:Literatür & Derleme Çalışması
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Purpose: To inspect the macular flow area, superficial and deep retinal vessel density measurements of optical coherence tomography (OCT) angiography (OCTA) in diabetic patients and healthy subjects. Methods: This retrospectively reviewed, and the cross-sectional study included 64 right eyes of 64 diabetic patients (Diabetic group) and 60 right eyes of 60 healthy (Control group) subjects. The diabetic group included two subgroups of patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) and patients with non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR). The groups and subgroups were compared in terms of the best- corrected visual acuity (BCVA), intraocular pressure and OCT/OCTA measurements, including central macular thickness (CMT, um), macular flow area (mm2), foveal and parafoveal vessel density (VD, %) in the superficial and deep retinal layers. Results: The mean values of BCVA and CMT were 0.42±0.32 and 0.86±0.17 (p

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

DEMİR, M., GUVEN, D., SENDUL, S. Y., KACAR, H., ARSLAN, G. D., AKPOLAT, C. (2022). Analysis of Retinal Vessel Density and Macular Flow Area in Diabetic and Healthy Participants Using Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography. Retina-Vitreus, Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 3, 220–225. https://ajindex.com/articles/589041

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (13)

  1. Soheilian M, Garfami KH, Ramezani A, et al. Two-year results of a randomized trial of intravitreal bevacizumab alone or combined with triamcinolone versus laser in diabetic macular edema. Retina. 2012; 32:314–21
  2. Nicholson BP, Schachat AP. A review of clinical trials of anti- VEGF agents for diabetic retinopathy. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2010; 248:915–30
  3. Klein BE. Overview of epidemiologic studies of diabetic retinopathy. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2007; 14:179–83
  4. Barham R, El Rami H, Sun JK, et al. Evidence-Based Treatment of Diabetic Macular Edema. Semin Ophthalmol. 2017; 32:56- 66
  5. Beltramo E, Porta M. Pericyte loss in diabetic retinopathy: mechanisms and consequences. Curr Med Chem. 2013; 20:3218–25
  6. Ip MS, Domalpally A, Sun JK, et al. Long-term effects of therapy with ranibizumab on diabetic retinopathy severity and baseline risk factors for worsening retinopathy. Ophthalmology. 2015; 122:367–74
  7. Sim DA, Keane PA, Zarranz-Ventura J, et al. Predictive factors for the progression of diabetic macular ischemia. Am J Ophthalmol. 2013; 156:684– 92
  8. Soares M, Neves C, Marques IP, et al. Comparison of diabetic retinopathy classification using fluorescein angiography and optical coherence tomography angiography. Br J Ophthalmol. 2017; 101:62-8
  9. Makita S, Jaillon F, Yamanari M, et al. Comprehensive in vivo microvascular imaging of the human eye by dual-beam-scan Doppler optical coherence angiography. Opt Express 2011; 19:1271-83
  10. Spaide RF, Klancnik JM, Jr, Cooney MJ. Retinal vascular layers imaged by fluorescein angiography and optical coherence tomography angiography. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2015; 133:45–50
  11. Mariampillai A, Standish BA, Moriyama EH, et al. Speckle variance detection of microvasculature using swept-source optical coherence tomography. Opt Lett. 2008;33: 1530–2
  12. Enfield J, Jonathan E, Leahy M. In vivo imaging of the microcirculation of the volar forearm using correlation mapping optical coherence tomography (cmOCT). Biomed Opt Express. 2011; 2:1184–93
  13. Jia Y, Bailey ST, Hwang TS, McClintic SM, et al. Quantitative optical coherence tomography angiography of vascular abnormalities in the living human eye. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015; 112: E2395-402. 14. de Carlo TE, Romano A, Waheed NK, et al. A review of optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA). Int J Retina Vitreous. 2015; 1:5. eCollection 15. Miura M, Makita S, Iwasaki T, et al. Three-dimensional visualization of ocular vascular pathology by