Dergiler / Retina-Vitreus / 2022 / Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 2

Evaluation of the Efficacy of Pneumatic Vitreolysis Treatment for Symptomatic Vitreomacular Traction Syndrome

Sayfa
145–151
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-17
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Conclusions: Pneumatic vitreolysis is a relatively safe, minimally invasive and effective treatment option for symptomatic focal VMT syndrome.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Purpose: To evaluate the posterior vitreous release rates after a single injection of expansile gas in patients with focal vitreomacular traction (VMT) syndrome.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Materials and Methods: Thirteen eyes of 13 consecutive patients with focal symptomatic VMT were reviewed retrospectively.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Conclusions: Pneumatic vitreolysis is a relatively safe, minimally invasive and effective treatment option for symptomatic focal VMT syndrome.
🔬Tür:Literatür & Derleme Çalışması
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the posterior vitreous release rates after a single injection of expansile gas in patients with focal vitreomacular traction (VMT) syndrome. Materials and Methods: Thirteen eyes of 13 consecutive patients with focal symptomatic VMT were reviewed retrospectively. Intravitreal injection of 0.3 mL of pure perfluoropropane (C3F8) was performed. Patients were instructed to bob their head forwards and backwards similar to the head movements of a ‘drinking bird’ until VMT release. A full ophthalmic examination and optical coherence tomography (OCT) was performed at each visit. Results: The mean age of the patients was 66.23±10.01. Seven patients (53.8%) were female, and 6 patients (46.2%) were male. VMT was released in 12 patients (93.7%), and the mean release time was 7.58 days (1-14 days). In two eyes (15.4%) with VMT associated with the full thickness macular hole (FTMH), the macular hole was not closed despite the posterior hyaloid release. The mean pre-treatment best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) improved significantly from 0.71±0.34 LogMAR to 0.54±0.28 LogMAR after the treatment (p=0.045). The mean central macular thickness (CMT) decreased significantly from 338.46±65.00 μm to 282.77±62.26 μm (p=0.013). In the preoperative period, the mean horizontal length of vitreomacular adhesion (HLVMA) was 691.92±268.24 μm. No correlation was found between HLVMA and release time (p=0.828). No complications were observed. Conclusions: Pneumatic vitreolysis is a relatively safe, minimally invasive and effective treatment option for symptomatic focal VMT syndrome.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Ozal, E., Garip, R., Cinar, A. K., Ozal, S. A. (2022). Evaluation of the Efficacy of Pneumatic Vitreolysis Treatment for Symptomatic Vitreomacular Traction Syndrome. Retina-Vitreus, Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 2, 145–151. https://ajindex.com/articles/589006

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (12)

  1. Johnson MW: Posterior vitreous detachment: evolution and complications of its early stages. American journal of ophthalmology 2010, 149:371-382. e371
  2. Flaxel CJ, Adelman RA, Bailey ST, Fawzi A, Lim JI, Vemulakonda GA, Ying G-s: Posterior Vitreous Detachment, Retinal Breaks, and Lattice Degeneration Preferred Practice Pattern®. Ophthalmology 2020, 127:P146-P181
  3. Bottos JM, Elizalde J, Rodrigues EB, Maia M: Current concepts in vitreomacular traction syndrome. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2012, 23:195-201
  4. Jackson TL, Donachie PH, Johnston RL: Electronic medical record database study of vitrectomy and observation for vitreomacular traction. Retina 2016, 36:1897-905
  5. Duker JS, Kaiser PK, Binder S, de Smet MD, Gaudric A, Reichel E, Sadda SR, Sebag J, Spaide RF, Stalmans P: The International Vitreomacular Traction Study Group classification of vitreomacular adhesion, traction, and macular hole. Ophthalmology 2013, 120:2611-9
  6. Dimopoulos S, Bartz-Schmidt K-U, Gelisken F, Januschowski K, Ziemssen F: Rate and timing of spontaneous resolution in a vitreomacular traction group: Should the role of watchful waiting be re-evaluated as an alternative to Ocriplasmin therapy? British Journal of Ophthalmology 2015, 99:350-3
  7. Sulkes DJ, Ip MS, Baumal CR, Wu HK, Puliafito CA: Spontaneous resolution of vitreomacular traction documented by optical coherence tomography. Archives of Ophthalmology 2000, 118:286-7
  8. Hwang DJ, Park KH, Woo SJ: Spontaneous resolution of vitreomacular traction syndrome with persistent vitreofoveal adhesion observed on spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. Canadian Journal of Ophthalmology 2012, 47:e17-e19
  9. Tzu JH, John VJ, Flynn HW, Smiddy WE, Jackson JR, Isernhagen BA, Carver A, Leonard R, Tabandeh H, Boyer DS: Clinical course of vitreomacular traction managed initially by observation. Ophthalmic Surgery, Lasers and Imaging Retina 2015, 46:571-6
  10. Odrobina D, Michalewska Z, Michalewski J, Dziegielewski K, Nawrocki J: Long-term evaluation of vitreomacular traction disorder in spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. Retina 2011, 31:324-31
  11. Jackson TL, Nicod E, Angelis A, Grimaccia F, Prevost AT, Simpson AR, Kanavos P: Pars plana vitrectomy for vitreomacular traction syndrome: a systematic review and metaanalysis of safety and efficacy. Retina 2013, 33:2012-7
  12. Toklu Y, Demirel S, Sarac O, Cakmak HB, Cagıl N: Anatomic and functional outcome of triamcinolone-assisted 23-gauge vitrectomy in vitreomacular traction