Dergiler / Perinatoloji Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 3

Gebelerde tetanoz immünizasyonu: Maternal değerlendirme, tetanoz aşılama durumu ve aşılama oranını etkileyen faktörler

Tetanus immunization in pregnant women: the factors affecting maternal evaluation, tetanus vaccination and vaccination rate

Sayfa
137–142
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Bulgular: Çal›flmaya toplam 227 gebe dahil edildi.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Amaç: Bu çal›flmada hastanemize baflvuran gebelerin tetanoz afl›s› hakk›ndaki bilgi, tutum ve davran›fllar›n›n de¤erlendirilmesi amaçlanm› flt›r.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Yöntem: Bu kesitsel çal›flmada, Ocak 2019 ve Temmuz 2019 aylar› aras›nda klini¤imize baflvuran gebeler dahil edildi.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Bulgular: Çal›flmaya toplam 227 gebe dahil edildi.
🔬Tür:Deneysel Tarla Denemesi
📍Kapsam:2019 · 46 hasta
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

Amaç: Bu çal›flmada hastanemize baflvuran gebelerin tetanoz afl›s› hakk›ndaki bilgi, tutum ve davran›fllar›n›n de¤erlendirilmesi amaçlanm› flt›r. Yöntem: Bu kesitsel çal›flmada, Ocak 2019 ve Temmuz 2019 aylar› aras›nda klini¤imize baflvuran gebeler dahil edildi. Tüm kat›- l›mc›lara gebelikte tetanoz afl›s› oranlar›n›, gebelerin tetanoz afl›s› hakk›ndaki bilgi, tutum ve davran›fllar›n› de¤erlendiren bir anket uyguland›. Bulgular: Çal›flmaya toplam 227 gebe dahil edildi. Hastalar›n ortalama yafllar› 29.5±6.12 bulunurken ortalama gebelik haftas› 30.79±7.49 saptand›. Daha önceki gebeli¤inde tetanoz afl›s› yapt›rmayan 46 (%12.6) hastan›n 24’ünün (%52.1) ise afl›n›n bebe¤ine zararl› oldu¤unu düflündü¤ü için afl› yapt›rmad›¤› tespit edildi. Ayr› ca daha önceki gebeli¤inde afl› yapt›rmad›¤›n› belirten 46 hastan›n 2’sinin ise takip eden doktorunun afl›ya karfl› oldu¤u saptand›. 172 (%75.7) hastan›n tetanoz afl›s› yapt›rmas› gerekti¤ini aile hekimi hemfliresinden ö¤rendi¤i tespit edildi. Tetanoz afl›s› olmas› gerekti¤ ini kad›n hastal›klar› ve do¤um uzman›ndan ö¤renen hasta say›- s› ise sadece 2 (%0.8) idi. Bu gebeli¤inde tetanoz afl›s› olan/olacak hasta say›s› 177 (%77.9) olarak bulunurken 47 (%20.7) hasta ise afl›- y› yapt›r›p yapt›rmama konusunda karars›zd›. Ayr›ca 200 (%88.1) hastan›n tetanoz afl›s›n›n gebelikte yan etkisi olmad›¤›n› bildi¤i tespit edildi. Sonuç: Afl›lanman›n önündeki en büyük hasta kaynakl› engel, hastalar› n afl›n›n bebeklerine zararl› olabilece¤ini düflünmeleri, afl› hakk›ndaki bilgi eksiklikleridir. Sa¤l›k çal›flanlar› kaynakl› en büyük engel ise hastalara afl› hakk›nda yeterli bilgi verilmemesi ve afl›- n›n gereklili¤inin yeteri kadar anlat›lmamas› ve özellikle kad›n do- ¤um hekimleri taraf›ndan tetanoz afl›s›n›n sadece birinci basamak sa¤l›k kurulufllar›n›n sorumlu¤unda gibi alg›lanmas›d›r.

Abstract

Objective: In our study, we aimed to evaluate the knowledge, attitudes and behaviors of pregnant women about tetanus vaccine who admitted to our hospital. Methods: The pregnant women who admitted to our clinic between January 2019 and July 2019 were included in this cross-sectional study. All participants took a questionnaire evaluating tetanus vaccine rates during pregnancy and the knowledge, attitude and behaviors of pregnant women about tetanus vaccine. Results: A total of 227 pregnant women were included in the study. The mean age of the patients was 29.5±6.12, and the mean week of gestation was 30.79±7.49. It was found that 24 (52.1%) of the 46 (12.6%) patients who were not vaccinated for tetanus in their previous pregnancies believed that the vaccine was harmful for the baby and therefore they were not vaccinated. In addition, it was found that the physicians who carried out the follow-ups of 2 of these 46 patients, who stated that they were not vaccinated in their previous pregnancies, were also anti-vaxxers. It was found out that 172 (75.7%) patients learnt from the family practitioner’s nurse that they needed to be vaccinated. The number of the patients who learnt from the obstetriciangynecologist that they needed to get tetanus vaccine was only 2 (0.8%). While there were 177 (77.9%) patients who were / will be vaccinated for tetanus in this pregnancy, 47 (20.7%) patients were indecisive for being vaccinated or not. Also, 200 (88.1%) patients knew that tetanus vaccine does not have any side effect on pregnancy. Conclusion: The greatest obstacles to the vaccination are the belief that vaccine may harm the baby, and the lack of knowledge about vaccination. The greatest obstacle caused by the healthcare professionals is the lack of providing sufficient information about vaccine, not explaining the necessities of vaccine to patients and the perception of obstetricians in particular that only the primary healthcare organizations are responsible for tetanus vaccine.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

KUL, G., TURAN, G. (2022). Gebelerde tetanoz immünizasyonu: Maternal değerlendirme, tetanoz aşılama durumu ve aşılama oranını etkileyen faktörler. Perinatoloji Dergisi, Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 3, 137–142. https://ajindex.com/articles/588346

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (13)

  1. Rasmussen SA, Jamieson DJ, Uyeki TM. Effects of influenza on pregnant women and infants. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2012; 207(3 Suppl):S3–8
  2. Healy CM, Baker CJ. Prospects for prevention of childhood infections by maternal immunization. Curr Opin Infect Dis 2006;19:271–6
  3. Fell DB, Sprague AE, Liu N, Yasseen AS 3rd, Wen SW, Smith G, et al.; Better Outcomes Registry & Network (BORN) Ontario. H1N1 influenza vaccination during pregnancy and fetal and neonatal outcomes. Am J Public Health 2012;102:e33–40
  4. Tomori MO. Assessing knowledge and practice of prevention of mother to child transmission of HIV documentation among health workers in Oyo State, South West, Nigeria. Texila International Journal of Public Health2016;5:1–16
  5. Gall SA. Prevention of pertussis, tetanus, and diphtheria among pregnant, postpartum women, and infants. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2012;55:498–509
  6. Meegan ME, Conroy RM, Lengeny SO, Renhault K, Nyangole J, et al. Effect on neonatal tetanus mortality after a culturally-based health promotion programme. Lancet 2001; 358:640–1
  7. Zerbo O, Modaressi S, Chan B, Goddard K, Lewis N, Bok K, et al. No association between influenza vaccination during pregnancy and adverse birth outcomes. Vaccine 2017;35: 3186–90
  8. TC Sa¤l›k Bakanl›¤›. Maternal ve neonatal tetanos eliminasyon program› saha rehberi. Ankara: TC Sa¤l›k Bakanl›¤›; 2006
  9. Liang JL, Tiwari T, Moro P, Messonnier NE, Reingold A, Sawyer M, Clark TA. Prevention of pertussis, tetanus, and diphtheria with vaccines in the United States: recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). MMWR Recomm Reports 2018;67:1–44
  10. World Health Organization. The immunological basis for immunization series. Geneva: WHO; 2011
  11. Centers for Disease and Control Prevention. CDC pregnant women and Tdap vaccination [Updated 2017 Aug 15]. [Internet]. Washington, DC: CDC; 2014. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/pregnancy/hcp-toolkit/tdapreport. html 12. Freund R, Le Ray C, Charlier C, Avenell C, Truster V, Tréluyer JM, et al.; Inserm COFLUPREG Study Group. Determinants of non-vaccination against pandemic 2009 H1N1 influenza in pregnant women: a prospective cohort study. PLoS One 2011;6:e20900
  12. Fabry P, Gagneur A, Pasquier JC. Determinants of A (H1N1) vaccination: cross-sectional study in a population of pregnant women in Quebec. Vaccine 2011;29:1824–9
  13. Celikel A, Ustunsoz A, Guvenc G. Determination of vaccination status of pregnant women during pregnancy and