Dergiler / OLBA / 2005 / Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 12

Yerleşim Modeli Oluşturmak Mümkün müdür? Dağlık Kilikia'dan İki Yerleşim Modeli Denemesi

Dergi
OLBA
Sayfa
165–184
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Other characteristic features of the settlement patterns in the territory are that acropolis and towers were constructed in the settlements and the locations of the settlements are in the borders of the valleys.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:In this article, the two peculiar settlement patterns of the Rough Cilicia will be investigated in detail on the basis of the architectural structures that these settlements have and their geographical locations.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:In the 4th and 3th century B.C., an colonization period began in the Mediterranean region.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Other characteristic features of the settlement patterns in the territory are that acropolis and towers were constructed in the settlements and the locations of the settlements are in the borders of the valleys.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

In this article, the two peculiar settlement patterns of the Rough Cilicia will be investigated in detail on the basis of the architectural structures that these settlements have and their geographical locations. By doing so, it is aimed that the characteristic of the urbanization in the region will be determined in order to find out whether the factors that affect this urbanization process are external or internal the Rough Cilicia in the Hellenistic period. In the 4th and 3th century B.C., an colonization period began in the Mediterranean region. These colonization activities were carried out by the Hellenistic kingdoms in order to protect and secure their borders. The Seleucids were vigorous colonizers. The Ptolemaios established numerous colonies throughout the Aegen and eastern Mediterranean. For the Ptolemaios, Cilicia important was the ship building timber supplied. In addition to this material, Cilicia was also a source of manpower. The major elements of Ptolemaic colonization activities in the Rough Cilicia, is the use of the major cities like Nagidos and Kelenderis. The Olbian Territory which is located between Kalykadnos and Lamos rivers is distinctive amongst other Anatolian temple states because of its architectural construction in the Hellenistic Period. The construction period in the Olbian Territory was supported by Seleucus I. Nikator in the beginning of the 2nd century B.C. this period has been observed with historical and archaeological data. The main feature of settlement patterns in the territory is to gather aims in militarian and civilian conditions. This kind of settlement for defence could be called “fortification/settlement” because of its civilian and militarian feature. Other characteristic features of the settlement patterns in the territory are that acropolis and towers were constructed in the settlements and the locations of the settlements are in the borders of the valleys.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

AYDINOĞLU, Ü. (2022). Yerleşim Modeli Oluşturmak Mümkün müdür? Dağlık Kilikia'dan İki Yerleşim Modeli Denemesi. OLBA, Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 12, 165–184. https://ajindex.com/articles/585046

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (18)

  1. Adams – Nissen 1972
  2. Adams, R. Mc. – H. Nissen, The Uruk Countryside: the Natural Setting of Urban Societies, Chicago. Ammerman 1981
  3. Ammerman, A. J., “Survey and Archaeological Research”, Annual Review of Anthropology 10, 63-88. Ammerman 1985
  4. Ammerman, A. J., “Plow-Zone Experiments in Calabria, Italy”, JFA 12, 33-40. Barker – Llyod 1991
  5. Barker, G. – J. Llyod (der.), Roman Landscapes: Archaeological Survey in the Mediterranean, Londra. Banning 2002
  6. Banning, E. B., Archaeological Survey, New York. Binford 1982
  7. Binford, L. R., “The Archaeology of Place”, JanthArch 1, 1-31. Bintliff et al. 2000
  8. Bintliff, J. – M. Kuna – N. Venclová, “Editorial Overview”, J. Bintliff – M. Kuna – N. Venclová (der.), The Future of Surface Artifact Survey in Europe içinde, 1-2, Sheffield. Bintliff 2000
  9. Bintliff, J., “Beyond Dots on the Map: Future Directions for Surface Artifact Survey in Greece”, J. Bintliff – M. Kuna – N. Venclová (der.), The Future of Surface Artifact Survey in Europe içinde, 3-20, Sheffield. Cambi 2000
  10. Cambi, F., “Quando i Campi hanno Pochi Significati da Estrarre: Visibilità Archeologica, Storia Istituzionale, Multi-Stage Work” Francovich, R.–H. Patterson (der.), Extracting Meaning from Ploughsoil Assemblages, 72-76, Oxford. Cherry et al.1991
  11. Cherry, J. F. – J. L. Davis ve E. Mantzourani, Landscape Archaeology as Long-Term History: Northern Keos in the Cycladic Islands from Earliest Settlement to Modern Times, Los Angeles. Childe 1931 Childe,V. G., Skara Brae: A Pictish Village in Orkney, Londra. Childe 1942 Childe,V. G., “The Chambered Cairns of Rousay”, AntJ XXII, 139- 142. Crumley – Marquardt 1990
  12. Crumley, C. L. – W. H. Marquardt, “Landscape: A Unifying Concept in Regional Analysis”, K. M. S. Allen – S.W. Gren – E. B.W. Zubrow (der.), Interpreating Space: GIS and Archaeology içinde, 73-79, New York. Clarke 1973
  13. Clarke, D., “Archaeology: the Loss of Innocence”, Antiquity 47, 6-18. Dikkaya 2003a
  14. Dikkaya, F., “Epistemolojik Bir Sorun Olarak Kazıbilim” O.Erdur–G. Duru (der.), Arkeoloji: Niye? Nasıl? Ne için? içinde, 183-192, İstanbul. Dikkaya 2003b
  15. Dikkaya, F., The Settlement Patterns of Altınova in the Early Bronze Age, yayınlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi, Ortadoğu Teknik Üniversitesi, Ankara. Dincauze 2000
  16. Dincauze, D. F., Environmental Archaeology: Principles and Practice, Cambridge. Ebert 1992
  17. Ebert, J. I., Distributional Archaeology, Albuquerque. Fahri Dikkaya 36 Evans – O’Connor 1989
  18. Evans, J. – Terry O’Connor, Environmental Archaeology: Principles and Method