Dergiler / Neurological sciences and neurophysiology (Online) / 2021 / Cilt: 38 - Sayı: 2

Normative Values of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation‑Evoked Parameters for Healthy Developing Children and Adolescents

Sayfa
90–96
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Conclusion: The TMS evoked parameters investigated in this study are necessary to accurately assess corticospinal pathway development in healthy children and adolescents.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Context: Normative data‑containing transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) evoked parameters are essential for correctly interpreting healthy development and assessing neuroplastic changes in certain neurologic disorders.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Settings and Design: In this cross‑sectional study, we measured TMS evoked parameters associated with cortical and spinal stimulation obtained from the four extremities of 46 healthy children and adolescents (21 boys and 25 girls; mean ± standard deviation age: 6.4 ± 1.2 years; range: 3.0–20.5 years).
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Conclusion: The TMS evoked parameters investigated in this study are necessary to accurately assess corticospinal pathway development in healthy children and adolescents.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Context: Normative data‑containing transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) evoked parameters are essential for correctly interpreting healthy development and assessing neuroplastic changes in certain neurologic disorders. Aims: The aim is to investigate corticospinal pathways by applying TMS to healthy developing children and adolescents. Settings and Design: In this cross‑sectional study, we measured TMS evoked parameters associated with cortical and spinal stimulation obtained from the four extremities of 46 healthy children and adolescents (21 boys and 25 girls; mean ± standard deviation age: 6.4 ± 1.2 years; range: 3.0–20.5 years). Statistical Analysis: Spearman’s correlation coefficients were calculated for each variable (weight and height) as a function of motor evoked potential (MEP) response latency and central motor conduction time (CMCT). Pearson’s Chi‑square test was used to determine the inter‑variable correlations. Results: Latencies of MEPs were correlated with age (P < 0.001, r = 0.6948) and height (P < 0.006, r = 0.7994). Amplitudes of active‑state MEPs were significantly higher than those of resting‑state MEPs associated with the upper and lower extremities. The mean values for active‑state MEP latencies were lower than those for resting‑state MEPs. The CMCT and magnitudes of latency jumps were calculated using reliable MEP data for children and adolescents. Additionally, the unresponsiveness rates were significantly higher for children aged below 7 years. Conclusion: The TMS evoked parameters investigated in this study are necessary to accurately assess corticospinal pathway development in healthy children and adolescents.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

TEKGÜL, H., POLAT, M., TEKGÜL, N., KÖSE, T., SAZ, U. (2022). Normative Values of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation‑Evoked Parameters for Healthy Developing Children and Adolescents. Neurological sciences and neurophysiology (Online), Cilt: 38 - Sayı: 2, 90–96. https://ajindex.com/articles/584299

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (16)

  1. Merton PA, Morton HB. Stimulation of the cerebral cortex in the intact human subject. Nature 1980;285:227
  2. Ziemann U, Hallett M, Cohen LG. Mechanisms of deafferentation‑induced plasticity in human motor cortex. J Neurosci 1998;18:7000‑7
  3. Kobayashi M, Pascual‑Leone A. Transcranial magnetic stimulation in neurology. Lancet Neurol 2003;2:145‑56
  4. Edwards MJ, Talelli P, Rothwell JC. Clinical applications of transcranial magnetic stimulation in patients with movement disorders. Lancet Neurol 2008;7:827‑40
  5. Carr LJ, Harrison LM, Evans AL, Stephens JA. Patterns of central motor reorganization in hemiplegic cerebral palsy. Brain 1993;116(Pt 5):1223‑47
  6. Nezu A, Kimura S, Uehara S, Kobayashi T, Tanaka M, Saito K. Magnetic stimulation of motor cortex in children: Maturity of corticospinal pathway and problem of clinical application. Brain Dev 1997;19:176‑80
  7. Eyre JA. Corticospinal tract development and its plasticity after perinatal injury. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2007;31:1136‑49
  8. Narayana S, Rezaie R, McAfee SS, Choudhri AF, Babajani‑Feremi A, Fulton S, et al. Assessing motor function in young children with transcranial magnetic stimulation. Pediatr Neurol 2015;52:94‑103
  9. Ziemann U. Thirty years of transcranial magnetic stimulation: Where do we stand? Exp Brain Res 2017;235:973‑84
  10. Testi F, Bastianelli M, Gabbanini S, Ammannati A, Cossu C, Del Corso F, et al
  11. Transcranial magnetic stimulation in children: Collection of normative values from the lower limbs. Clin Neurophysiol 2016;127:e339
  12. Dunn HG. Importance of Rett syndrome in child neurology. Brain Dev 2001;23:38‑43
  13. Hoffbuhr K, Devaney JM, LaFleur B, Sirianni N, Scacheri C, Giron J, et al. Two affected boys in a Rett syndrome family: Clinical and molecular findings. Neurology 2001;55:1188‑93
  14. Staudt M, Grodd W, Gerloff C, Erb M, Stitz J, Krägeloh‑rägelohelohgelohelohlipsilateral reorganization in congenital hemiparesis: A TMS and fMRI study. Brain 2002;125:2222‑37
  15. Tekgul H, Saz U, Yilmaz S, Polat M, Aktan G, Kose T, et al. A transcranial magnetic stimulation study for the investigation of corticospinal motor pathways in children with cerebral palsy. J Clin Neurosci 2020;78:153‑8
  16. Rossini PM, Barker AT, Berardelli A, Caramia MD, Caruso G, Cracco RQ, et al. Non‑invasive electrical and magnetic stimulation of the brain, spinal cord and roots: Basic principles and procedures for routine clinical application. Report of an IFCN Committee. Electroencephalogr Clin Neu