Dergiler / Milli Eğitim / 2015 / Cilt: 44 - Sayı: 206

THE TOPIC-SPECIFIC STRATEGIES ON THE LIMIT CONCEPT IN MATHEMATICS STUDENT TEACHERS LESSONS

Sayfa
160–186
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The partici- pants related to the limit concept with the real life generally on their first lesson and they stated in the interview the reason why they preferred this strategy was to provide better understanding of students on limit concept.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The purpose of this study is to investigate the topic-specific strategies used by the mathematics student teachers in their lessons on the limit concept.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Limit-specific strategies used by participants on their teach- ing examined under limit-specific representations and limit-specific activities.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The partici- pants related to the limit concept with the real life generally on their first lesson and they stated in the interview the reason why they preferred this strategy was to provide better understanding of students on limit concept.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to investigate the topic-specific strategies used by the mathematics student teachers in their lessons on the limit concept. The participants were four secondary mathematics student teachers in the final year of mathematics teacher education program. The data were obtained from the participants lesson plans, video recordings of their lessons in which they taught the concept of limit, and from semi-structured interviews. Limit-specific strategies used by participants on their teach- ing examined under limit-specific representations and limit-specific activities. Limit- specific representations were categorized as (a) figural, (b) number line, (c) tabular, (d) graphical, (e) algebraic, and (f) verbal. Limit-specific activities were categorized as (a) game, (b) real life examples, (c) animation, (d) scenario supported by visuals, (e) ana- logy, (f) Escher s paintings, (g) other disciplines, (h) discussing the limit of the polyno- mial functions, and (i) reinforcing the properties of limit. The most used limit-specific representations by participants were verbal and algebraic representations. The partici- pants related to the limit concept with the real life generally on their first lesson and they stated in the interview the reason why they preferred this strategy was to provide better understanding of students on limit concept.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

GÜZEL, E. B., KULA, S. (2022). THE TOPIC-SPECIFIC STRATEGIES ON THE LIMIT CONCEPT IN MATHEMATICS STUDENT TEACHERS LESSONS. Milli Eğitim, Cilt: 44 - Sayı: 206, 160–186. https://ajindex.com/articles/580670

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (9)

  1. AKKOÇ, H. (2006). Bilgisayar Destekli Matematik Öğretimi: Grafik Analiz Yaklaşımı: İlköğretim İkinci Kademe ve Liseler İçin. Toroslu Kitaplığı: İstanbul.
  2. BALL, D. L. (1990). “The Mathematical Understanding that Prospective Teachers Bring to Teacher Education”, Elementary School Journal, 90, 449-466.
  3. BEZUIDENHOUT J (2001). “Limits and Continuity: Some Conceptions of First Year Students”, International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 32(4): 487-500.
  4. CARLSEN, W.S. (1991). “Effects of New Biology Teachers’ Subject-Matter Knowledge on Curricular Planning”, Science Education. 75, 631-647.
  5. CHANG, Y. (2005). The Pedagogical Content Knowledge of Teacher Educator: A Case Study in A Democratic Teacher Preparation Program. Doctoral Dissertation. College of Education of Ohio University. COX, S. (2008). A Conceptual Analysis of Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge. Doctoral Dissertation, Brigham Young University. CORNU, B. (1991).
  6. Limits. In Tall, D. (Ed.) Advanced Mathematical Thinking. Boston: Kluwer, 153-166.
  7. DANI, D. E. (2004). The Impact of Content and Pedagogy Courses on Science Teachers’ Pedagogical Content Knowledge. Doctoral dissertation, University of Cincinnati. DAVIS, R. ve VINNER, S. (1986). “The Notion of Limit: Some Seemingly Unavoidable Misconception Stages”, Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 5, 281-303.
  8. DeWINDT-KING, A.M., GOLDIN, G. A. (2003). “Children’s visual imagery: Aspects of cognitive representation in solving problems with fractions”, Mediterranean Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 2 (1), 1-42.
  9. DOMINGOS, A. (2009). “Learning Advanced Mathematical Concepts: The Concept of Limit”, Proceedings of CERME 6, January 28th-February 1st 2009, Lyon France. Millî Eğitim Sayı 206 Bahar/2015 183 Matematik Öğretmeni Adaylarının Derslerinde Kullandıkları Limit Kavramına Özgü. ELIA, I., GAGATSIS, A., PANAOURA, A., ZACHARIADES, T. ve ZOULINAKI, F. (2009). “Geometric and Algebraic Approaches in the Concept of “Limit” and the Impact of the “Didactic Contract””. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 7, 765-790. FERNÁNDEZ-BALBOA, J.-M. ve STIEHL, J. (1995). “The Generic Nature of Pedagogical Content Knowledge among College Professors”, Teaching and Teacher Education, 11, 293–306. GOTTHEINER, D. M., SIEGEL, M. A. (2012). “Experienced Middle School Science Teachers’ Assessment Literacy: Investigating Knowledge of Students’ Conceptions in Genetics and Ways to Shape Instruction“, Journal of Scien