Dergiler / Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri / 2015 / Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 5

The Effect of Dynamic Geometry Software and Physical Manipulatives on Candidate Teachers' Transformational Geometry Success

Sayfa
1417–1435
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The exercises performed with all groups increased their success levels significantly, thus showing that the applications were effective

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:This study aims to investigate the effects of using Dynamic Geometry Software (DGS) Cabri II Plus and physical manipulatives on the transformational geometry achievement of candidate teachers.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The samples of this study were 117 students.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The exercises performed with all groups increased their success levels significantly, thus showing that the applications were effective
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

This study aims to investigate the effects of using Dynamic Geometry Software (DGS) Cabri II Plus and physical manipulatives on the transformational geometry achievement of candidate teachers. In this study, the semiexperimental method was used, consisting of two experimental and one control groups. The samples of this study were 117 students. A 30-question test which was prepared based on the relative literature and expert opinion was used as a data collection tool. The test includes sections on recognition, features, and construction, and each section consists of ten questions. The data obtained from the pre- and post-tests were analyzed using the SPSS program. As a result of the statistical analysis, success levels of all groups were found to be the same before the applications, but after the applications, students' transformational geometry success was found to significantly increase. When group success was analyzed, it was seen that the Computer Group placed first, the Manipulatives Group placed second, and the Traditional Group placed third in the sections of recognition and features. In the construction section, the Computer and Manipulatives Groups' success levels were equal, and both groups were significantly more successful than the Traditional Group. The exercises performed with all groups increased their success levels significantly, thus showing that the applications were effective

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

YILMAZ, G. K. (2022). The Effect of Dynamic Geometry Software and Physical Manipulatives on Candidate Teachers' Transformational Geometry Success. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri, Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 5, 1417–1435. https://ajindex.com/articles/576758

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (13)

  1. Absi, M. M., & Nofal, M. B. (2010). The effect of using manipulatives on the mathematical achievement of the first grade students. Damascus University Journal, 26(4), 37-54.
  2. Akgül, M. B. (2014). The effect of using dynamic geometry software on eight grade students' achievement in transformation geometry, geometric thinking and attitudes toward mathematics and technology (Master's thesis, Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey). Retrieved from https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/
  3. Aksoy, Y., & Bayazit, İ. (2010). Simetri kavramının öğrenim ve öğretiminde karşılaşılan zorlukların analitik bir yaklaşımla incelenmesi. In E. Bingölballi & M. F. Özmantar (Eds.), I?lköğretimde karşılaşılan matematiksel zorluklar ve çözüm önerileri (pp. 187-215). Ankara:
  4. Pegem. Aydın-Ünal, Z., & İpek, A. S. (2009). The effect of realistic mathematics education on 7th grade students' achievements in multiplication of integers. Education and Science, 34(152), 60-70.
  5. Baki, A. (2001). Bilişim teknolojisi ışığı altında matematik eğitiminin değerlendirilmesi [Evaluation of mathematics education in the light of information technology]. Journal of Milli Eğitim, 149, 26-31.
  6. Ball, D. L. (1990). Prospective elementary and secondary teachers' understanding of division. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 21(2), 132-144.
  7. Battista, M. T. (1999). Geometry results from the third international mathematics and science study. Teaching Children Mathematics, 5(6), 367-373.
  8. Baykul, Y. (2002). I?lköğretimde matematik öğretimi, 1-5. sınıflar için [Mathematics teaching in primary schools 5th classes] (6th ed.). Ankara:
  9. Pegem. Carroll, W. M. (1998). Middle school students' reasoning about geometric situations. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 3, 398-403.
  10. Dixon, J. K. (1997). Computer use and visualization in students' construction of reflection and rotation concepts. School Science and Mathematics, 97(7), 352-358.
  11. Duatepe, A., & Ersoy, Y. (2001). Teknoloji destekli matematik öğretimi-I: Hesap makinesi ve okullarda geometri öğretimi Technology-based mathematics education I: Calculator and geometry teaching in schools]. Ankara:
  12. Milli Kütüphane. Durmuş, S., & Karakırık, E. (2006). Virtual manipulatives in mathematics education: A theoretical framework. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, (1), 117-123.
  13. Egelioğlu, H. C. (2008). Computer based education has an influence on success and epistemological belief in teaching of sublearning zones of transformati