Dergiler / Journal of Turkish Spinal Surgery / 2021 / Cilt: 32 - Sayı: 4

LAMINOPLASTY FOR THE SURGICAL TREATMENT OF VARIOUS SPINAL CANAL PATHOLOGIES

Sayfa
148–153
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Laminoplasty is a preferred technique with the low complication rates and high patient-comfort in the postoperative period.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Objective: It was aimed to evaluate the patients who underwent laminoplasty for the various pathologies that were located in the spinal canal.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Materials and Methods: The records of the patients who underwent osteoplastic laminoplasty for various pathologies between 2014 and 2019 were analyzed retrospectively.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Laminoplasty is a preferred technique with the low complication rates and high patient-comfort in the postoperative period.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2014 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Objective: It was aimed to evaluate the patients who underwent laminoplasty for the various pathologies that were located in the spinal canal. Materials and Methods: The records of the patients who underwent osteoplastic laminoplasty for various pathologies between 2014 and 2019 were analyzed retrospectively. Patient data including age, gender, preoperative and postoperative neurological conditions, type and radiographic localization of their pathologies, preoperative and postoperative deformities, involved segments, hospitalization periods and postoperative complications were gathered. Results: Sixty-two patients were included in the study. The mean age of the patients was 44.3 years (9-80 years). Fifty-two patients had tumoral and 10 patients had non-tumoral pathologies. Grade 3 and 4 patients were predominant in the preoperative period, while grade 1 and 2 patients were predominant in the postoperative period according to Modified McCormick Scale classification of the patients. Twenty-three patients had preoperative deformity. A total of 138 laminae were reconstructed. One patient had cerebrospinal fluid leak in the long-term period and 1 patient had quadriplegia and respiratory deficiency in the postoperative period. In only 1 patient, a new-onset deformity developed and in 1 patient, progression of previous deformity was seen. However, the deformities of these patients did not require corrective surgery. Conclusion: Laminoplasty technique has recently gained popularity and begun to replace traditional laminectomy technique. Laminoplasty is a preferred technique with the low complication rates and high patient-comfort in the postoperative period.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ER, U., OKTAY, K., ÖZSOY, K. M., ÇETİNALP, N. E., GÜZEL, E., GÜZEL, A. (2022). LAMINOPLASTY FOR THE SURGICAL TREATMENT OF VARIOUS SPINAL CANAL PATHOLOGIES. Journal of Turkish Spinal Surgery, Cilt: 32 - Sayı: 4, 148–153. https://ajindex.com/articles/568574

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (14)

  1. Menku A, Koc RK, Oktem IS, Tucer B, Kurtsoy A. Laminoplasty with miniplates for posterior approach in thoracic and lumbar intraspinal surgery. Turk Neurosurg. 2010;20:27-32
  2. Montano N, Trevisi G, Cioni B, Lucantoni C, Della Pepa GM, Meglio M, et al. The role of laminoplasty in preventing spinal deformity in adult patients submitted to resection of an intradural spinal tumor. Case series and literature review. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2014;125:69-74
  3. Hirabayashi K, Watanabe K, Wakano K, Suzuki N, Satomi K, Ishii Y. Expansive open door laminoplasty for cervical spinal stenotic myelopathy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1983;8:693-9
  4. Raimondi AJ, Gutierrez FA, Di Rocco C. Laminotomy and total reconstruction of the posterior spinal arch for spinal canal surgery in childhood. J Neurosurg. 1976;45:555-69
  5. Kurokawa T, Tsuyama N, Tanaka H. Enlargement of spinal canal by sagittal splitting of spinous process. Bessatsu Seikeigeka (Jpn). 1982;2:234-40
  6. Goel A, Deogaonkar M. Thoracic laminoplasty using spino processes - Technical Note. Neurol Med Chir. 1996;36:659-61
  7. Hara M, Takayasu M, Takagi T, Yoshida J. En bloc laminoplasty performed with threadwire saw: Technical note. Neurosurgery. 2001,48:235-9
  8. Kawahara N, Tomita K, Shinya Y, Matsumoto T, Baba H, Fujita T, et al. Recapping T-saw laminoplasty for spinal cord tumors. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1999;24:1363-70
  9. Wiedemayer H, Sandalcioglu IE, Aalders M, Wiedemayer H, Floerke M, Stolke D. Reconstruction of the laminar roof with miniplates for a posterior approach in intraspinal surgery: technical considerations and critical evaluation of follow-up results. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004;29:E333-42. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000134592.07941.5e
  10. Panjabi MM, White AA 3rd. Basic biomechanics of the spine. Neurosurgery. 1980;7:76-93
  11. Iida Y, Kataoka O, Sho T, Sumi M, Hirose T, Bessho Y, et al. Postoperative lumbar spinal instability occurring or progressing secondary to laminectomy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1990;15:1186-9
  12. Mayfield FH. Complications of laminectomy. Clin Neurosurg. 1976;23:435-6
  13. Papagelopoulos PJ, Peterson HA, Ebersold MJ, Emmanuel PR, Choudhury SN, Quast LM. Spinal column deformity and instability after lumbar or thoracolumbar laminectomy for intraspinal tumors in children and young adults. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1997;22:442-51
  14. Sciubba DM, Chaichana KL, Woodworth GF, McGirt MJ, Gokaslan ZL, Jallo GI. Factors associated with cervical instability requiring fusion after cervical l