KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Journal of Turkish Spinal Surgery / 2022 / Cilt: 33 - Sayı: 3

BIOMECHANICAL CHANGES IN CERVICAL SPINE SEQUENCING AFTER RIGID LUMBAR STABILIZATION

Ali Fahir ÖZER
Ahmet Tulgar BAŞAK
Muhammet Arif ÖZBEK
Sayfa
108–112
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Preoperative and postoperative cervical spine parameters were compared using Wilcoxon test.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Objective: Surgical stabilization of the thoraco-lumbar spine can induce biomechanical changes in other spinal regions, potentially influencing postoperative outcome.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Materials and Methods: Twenty patients (10 males and 10 females, mean age 64.6 years) with lumbar degeneration receiving rigid stabilization (polyaxial screws and titanium rods) were included in the study.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Preoperative and postoperative cervical spine parameters were compared using Wilcoxon test.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Objective: Surgical stabilization of the thoraco-lumbar spine can induce biomechanical changes in other spinal regions, potentially influencing postoperative outcome. This study detected biomechanical changes in cervical spine sequencing and identify preoperative parameters associated with these changes following rigid stabilization surgery for degenerative lumbar spinal disease. Materials and Methods: Twenty patients (10 males and 10 females, mean age 64.6 years) with lumbar degeneration receiving rigid stabilization (polyaxial screws and titanium rods) were included in the study. Preoperative and postoperative anterioposterior and sagittal scoliosis x-rays were retrospectively evaluated by an independent researcher using SurgimapR (Nemaris Inc., USA). Preoperative and postoperative cervical spine parameters were compared using Wilcoxon test. A p

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ÖZER, A. F., BAŞAK, A. T., ÖZBEK, M. A. (2022). BIOMECHANICAL CHANGES IN CERVICAL SPINE SEQUENCING AFTER RIGID LUMBAR STABILIZATION. Journal of Turkish Spinal Surgery, Cilt: 33 - Sayı: 3, 108–112. https://ajindex.com/articles/568566

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (12)

  1. Roussouly P, Pinheiro-Franco JL. Sagittal parameters of the spine: biomechanical approach. Eur Spine J. 2011;20(Suppl 5):578-85
  2. Scheer JK, Tang JA, Smith JS, Acosta FL Jr, Protopsaltis TS, Blondel B, et al. Cervical spine alignment, sagittal deformity, and clinical implications: a review. J Neurosurg Spine. 2013;19:141-59
  3. Attiah M, Gaonkar B, Alkhalid Y, Villaroman D, Medina R, Ahn C, et al. Natural history of the aging spine: a cross-sectional analysis of spinopelvic parameters in the asymptomatic population. J Neurosurg Spine. 2019:1-6
  4. Yu M, Zhao WK, Li M, Wang SB, Sun Y, Jiang L, et al. Analysis of cervical and global spine alignment under Roussouly sagittal classification in Chinese cervical spondylotic patients and asymptomatic subjects. Eur Spine J. 2015;24:1265-73
  5. Hey HWD, Tan KA, Chin BZ, Liu G, Wong HK. Comparison of whole body sagittal alignment during directed vs natural, relaxed standing postures in young, healthy adults. Spine J. 2019;19:1832-9
  6. Lee SH, Son ES, Seo EM, Suk KS, Kim KT. Factors determining cervical spine sagittal balance in asymptomatic adults: correlation with spinopelvic balance and thoracic inlet alignment. Spine J. 2015;15:705-12
  7. Boulay C, Tardieu C, Hecquet J, Benaim C, Mouilleseaux B, Marty C, et al. Sagittal alignment of spine and pelvis regulated by pelvic incidence: standard values and prediction of lordosis. Eur Spine J. 2006;15:415-22
  8. Glassman SD, Bridwell K, Dimar JR, Horton W, Berven S, Schwab F. The impact of positive sagittal balance in adult spinal deformity. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005;30:2024-9
  9. Ha Y, Schwab F, Lafage V, Mundis G, Shaffrey C, Smith J, et al. Reciprocal changes in cervical spine alignment after corrective thoracolumbar deformity surgery. Eur Spine J. 2014;23:552-9
  10. Virk S, Passias P, Lafage R, Klineberg E, Mundis G, Protopsaltis T, et al. Intraoperative alignment goals for distinctive sagittal morphotypes of severe cervical deformity to achieve optimal improvements in healthrelated quality of life measures. Spine J. 2020;20:1267-75
  11. Diebo BG, Challier V, Henry JK, Oren JH, Spiegel MA, Vira S, et al. Predicting Cervical Alignment Required to Maintain Horizontal Gaze Based on Global Spinal Alignment. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2016;41:1795-800
  12. Goldschmidt E, Angriman F, Agarwal N, Trevisan M, Zhou J, Chen K, et al. A New Piece of the Puzzle to Understand Cervical Sagittal Alignment: Utilizing a Novel Angle δ to Describe the Relationship among T1 Vertebral