Dergiler / Journal of Thermal Engineering / 2019 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 6

SHIP EMISSION ESTIMATION FOR IZMIR AND MERSIN INTERNATIONAL PORTS – TURKEY

Sayfa
184–195
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The amount of emissions of Mersin port, which has a higher number of movements, was higher than that of İzmir port.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Approximately 90% of the world trade is done by sea trade.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:As a result, total Nitrogen Oxide (NOx), Sulphur Dioxide (SO2), Carbon Dioxide (CO2), Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC), Particulate Matter (PM) and Carbon Monoxide (CO) emissions of İzmir Port are calculated as 900 tons/year, 589 tons/year, 45320.5 tons/year, 49.7 tons/year, 77.7 tons/year and 36.9 tons/year, respectively.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The amount of emissions of Mersin port, which has a higher number of movements, was higher than that of İzmir port.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Shipping Emissions · Ports · Global Warming

Abstract

Approximately 90% of the world trade is done by sea trade. The world maritime trade fleet is also increasing every year. Since ships use fossil fuels, they contribute to global climate change. It is very important for the environment and human health to calculate emissions in the port areas where ships do cargo operations. In this study, emissions analysis of the two important ports of Turkey’s is performed with using the bottom-up calculation method. In addition, hotelling periods of the vessels are monitored for both ports for one year period. As a result, total Nitrogen Oxide (NOx), Sulphur Dioxide (SO2), Carbon Dioxide (CO2), Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC), Particulate Matter (PM) and Carbon Monoxide (CO) emissions of İzmir Port are calculated as 900 tons/year, 589 tons/year, 45320.5 tons/year, 49.7 tons/year, 77.7 tons/year and 36.9 tons/year, respectively. Moreover, total NOx, SO2, CO2, VOC, PM and CO emissions of Mersin Port are calculated as 1998 tons/year, 1339 tons/year, 102330 tons/year, 114.5 tons/year, 178.5 tons/year and 82.5 tons/year, respectively. The amount of emissions of Mersin port, which has a higher number of movements, was higher than that of İzmir port.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

EKMEKÇİOĞLU, A., ÜNLÜGENÇOĞLU, K., ÇELEBİ, U. B. (2022). SHIP EMISSION ESTIMATION FOR IZMIR AND MERSIN INTERNATIONAL PORTS – TURKEY. Journal of Thermal Engineering, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 6, 184–195. https://ajindex.com/articles/566773

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (14)

  1. F. Alarçin, G. Kökkülünk, and K. Ünlügençoğlu, “Estimation of Shipping Emissions via Novel Developed Data Collecting and Calculation Software: A Case Study for the Region of Ambarli Port,” Int. J. Glob. Warm., vol. 19, p. 1, Jan. 2019
  2. K. Ünlügençoğlu, “Investigation of exhaust emissions from ships with different methods,” Yıldız Technical university, 2018
  3. R. A. O. Nunes, M. C. M. Alvim-Ferraz, F. G. Martins, and S. I. V. Sousa, “Assessment of shipping emissions on four ports of Portugal,” Environ. Pollut., vol. 231, pp. 1370–1379, 2017
  4. C. Trozzi, “Emission estimate methodology for maritime navigation,” p. 6, 2010
  5. N. Robinson, “European Commission Quantification of emissions from ships associated with ship movements between ports in the European Community European Commission Quantification of emissions from ships associated with ship movements between ports in the European Commu,” no. July, 2002
  6. E. Tzannatos, “Ship emissions and their externalities for the port of Piraeus - Greece,” Atmos. Environ., vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 400–407, 2010
  7. V. Knežević, R. Radonja, and Č. Dundović, “Emission inventory of marine traffic for the port of zadar,” Pomorstvo, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 239–244, 2018
  8. J. Coello, I. Williams, D. A. Hudson, and S. Kemp, “An AIS-based approach to calculate atmospheric emissions from the UK fishing fleet,” Atmos. Environ., vol. 114, pp. 1–7, 2015
  9. D. O. Olukanni and C. O. Esu, “Estimating greenhouse gas emissions from port vessel operations at the Lagos and Tin Can ports of Nigeria,” Cogent Eng., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 1–9, 2018
  10. Y. T. Chang, Y. Song, and Y. Roh, “Assessing greenhouse gas emissions from port vessel operations at the Port of Incheon,” Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ., vol. 25, pp. 1–4, 2013
  11. F. Ledoux, C. Roche, F. Cazier, C. Beaugard, and D. Courcot, “Influence of ship emissions on NOx, SO2, O3 and PM concentrations in a North-Sea harbor in France,” J. Environ. Sci. (China), vol. 71, no. x, pp. 56–66, 2018
  12. T. Chu-Van et al., “On-board measurements of particle and gaseous emissions from a large cargo vessel at different operating conditions,” Environ. Pollut., vol. 237, pp. 832–841, 2018
  13. J. Cheng and H. Li, “Analysis of Environmental Benefits of Shore Power for Preventing and Controlling Air Pollution Caused by Vessels at Berth,” E3S Web Conf., vol. 53, no. 2018, 2018
  14. X. Sun, Z. Tian, R. Malekian, and Z. Li, “Estimation of vessel emissions inventory in Qingdao port