Dergiler / Journal of education and research in nursing (Online) / 2022 / Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 1

Investigation of the Relationship Between Socio-Demographic Characteristics, Metabolic Variables, and Treatment Adherence in Individuals with Diabetes

Sayfa
7–16
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

In this context, it is recommended to evaluate the treatment adherence of individuals with diabetes and their needs in this respect.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Aim: This study was conducted to examine the relationship between socio-demographic characteristics, metabolic variables, and treatment adherence in individuals with diabetes.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Methods: The study population consisted of individuals who were treated in Balıkesir State Hospital Endocrinology Clinic, and the study sample included 260 individuals with diabetes who met the inclusion criteria and volunteered to participate in the study.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:In this context, it is recommended to evaluate the treatment adherence of individuals with diabetes and their needs in this respect.
🔬Tür:Laboratuvar & Saha Deneyi
📍Kapsam:2015 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Aim: This study was conducted to examine the relationship between socio-demographic characteristics, metabolic variables, and treatment adherence in individuals with diabetes. Methods: The study population consisted of individuals who were treated in Balıkesir State Hospital Endocrinology Clinic, and the study sample included 260 individuals with diabetes who met the inclusion criteria and volunteered to participate in the study. The data were collected between November 30, 2015, and September 30, 2016, by using the face-to-face interview method. In the evaluation of the data, the Shapiro Wilk test was used to analyze the normality of the variables, and Mann–Whitney U and Kruskal–Wallis H tests were used to analyze the differences between the groups. In case of significant differences from the Kruskal–Wallis H test, a post hoc multiple comparison test was employed, and Spearman’s correlation coefficient was used for variables that did not show a normal distribution. Results: Of the individuals with diabetes, 79.23% were female, 40.77% were in the 56-65 age group, 95.77% stated that they followed the recommended treatment regularly, and 95.38% reported that they accepted the treatment. It was determined that 93.08% of the individuals followed their blood sugar, 22.69% regularly applied medical nutrition therapy, 28.84% did regular exercise, 23.46% paid attention to their foot care, and 88.08% had received education on diabetes before. The examination of individuals’ metabolic control levels indicated that the mean HbA1c was 8.57 ± 2.11, the mean total cholesterol was 206.55 ± 48.62 mg/dL, the mean systolic/diastolic blood pressure was 129.88 ± 16.31/78.08 ± 14.39, and the mean body mass index was 29.39 ± 5.65 kg/m². There was a statistically significant difference between gender and acceptance of the treatment, age groups and doing regular exercise, education level and doing regular exercise, paying attention to foot care and previous education on diabetes, HbA1c value and doing regular exercise, and BMI value and regular application of medical nutrition therapy. Conclusion: It was found that the majority of the individuals with diabetes accepted the treatment and controlled their blood sugar, but that the majority of them did not pay attention to their medical nutrition, exercise, and foot care. The healthcare team, especially diabetes nurses, has considerable responsibilities in the treatment and care of individuals with diabetes. Since metabolic variables provide clues about treatment adherence in individuals with diabetes, it is important to monitor patients’ metabolic parameters as well as their body mass index. In this context, it is recommended to evaluate the treatment adherence of individuals with diabetes and their needs in this respect.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

YILDIZ, H., ASLAN, G. Y., TEKİR, Ö. (2022). Investigation of the Relationship Between Socio-Demographic Characteristics, Metabolic Variables, and Treatment Adherence in Individuals with Diabetes. Journal of education and research in nursing (Online), Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 1, 7–16. https://ajindex.com/articles/562520

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (12)

  1. Tanrıverdi MH, Çelepkolu T, Aslanhan H. Diyabet ve birinci basamak sağlık hizmetleri. J Clin Exper Investig. 2013;4(4):562-567
  2. Çınar S, Kara K. Diyabetli kadınlarda diyabet bakım profili ve metabolik kontrol değişkenleri arasındaki ilişkinin değerlendirilmesi. Diyabet, Obezite ve Hipertansiyonda Hemşirelik Forumu Derg. 2010;2(2):11-19
  3. Gülşen G, Olgun N. Diyabetli hastalarda ayak bakımı ve ayakkabı kullanım alışkanlıklarının belirlenmesi. Uluslararası Hakemli Hemşirelik Araştırmaları Derg. 2014;1(2):38-58
  4. Bayraktar AK, Tekir Ö, Yıldız H. Tip 2 diyabetli bireylere mobil telefonları aracılığı ile uzaktan verilen video eğitimin diyabetle ilgili bilgi ve alışkanlıklara etkisi. TJFMPC. 2021;15(1):110-120
  5. Hill-Briggs F, Adler NE, Berkowitz SA, et al. Social determinants of health and diabetes: a scientific review. Diabetes Care. 2020;44:258-279. [CrossRef] 6. Mokhtari Z, Gheshlagh RG, Kurdi A. Health-related quality of life in Iranian patients with type 2 diabetes: an updated meta-analysis. Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2019;13(1):402-407. [CrossRef] 7. World Health Organization (WHO). Diabetes. Available at: https://www.who.int/health-topics/diabetes#tab=tab_1. Access date 14.11.2021
  6. Ridosh MM, Roux G, Meehan M, Penckofer S. Barriers to self-management in depressed women with type 2 diabetes. Can J Nurs Res. 2017;49(4):160- 169. [CrossRef] 9. Tekir Ö, Esen A. Diyabetlide yaşam biçiminin güçlendirilmesi için yetki sürecinin incelenmesi. Diyabet, Obezite ve Hipertansiyonda Hemşirelik Forumu Derg. 2012;4(1):22-31
  7. Tekir Ö, Esen A. Güçlendirme kavramı ve diyabetli bireylerin güçlendirilmesi. Diyabet, Obezite ve Hipertansiyonda Hemşirelik Forumu Derg. 2012;4(1):15-21
  8. World Health Organization (WHO). Available at: https://www.who.int/healt h-topics/diabetes#tab=tab_1. Access 12.11.2021
  9. Özkaptan B, Kapucu S, Demirci İ. Relationship between adherence to treatment and acceptance of illness in patients with type 2 diabetes. Cukurova Med J. 2019;44(suppl 1):447-454
  10. Arslan E. Tip 2 Diabetes Mellituslu Hastaların Tedaviye Uyumlarını Etkileyen Faktörler (Tıpta uzmanlik tezi). Diyarbakır: Dicle Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Halk Sağlığı Anabilim Dalı; 2011
  11. Dikeç G, Kutlu Y. Ruhsal bozukluklarda tedavi uyumunu artırmak için bir yöntem: tedaviye uyum programı. Psikiyatr Hemşireliği Derg. 2015;6(1):40-46
  12. Akın S 2011. Diyabetli Hastalarda Uyumun ve Aile Destek Düzeylerinin Belirlenmesi (Yüksek lisans tezi). İstanbul: İstanbul Bilim Ünivers