Dergiler / Journal of critical and intensive care (Online) / 2022 / Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 1

Comparison of Predictive Scoring Systems in Assessing Risk for Intensive Care Unit Admission and In-Hospital Mortality in Patients with Urinary Tract Infections

Sayfa
25–31
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

CRB-65 and qSOFA have superior performance compared to CRB and SIRS in predicting mortality.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Objective: We aimed to investigate the effectiveness of confusion, respiratory rate, blood pressure (CRB), CRB65, and quick sequential organ failure assessment (qSOFA) in predicting intensive care unit (ICU) admission and in-hospital mortality of patients with urinary tract infections (UTI) compared with Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (SIRS).
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Methods: Data of patients with UTI who visited the emergency department of a single centre between February 2018 and March 2020 were retrospectively analysed.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:CRB-65 and qSOFA have superior performance compared to CRB and SIRS in predicting mortality.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2018 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Objective: We aimed to investigate the effectiveness of confusion, respiratory rate, blood pressure (CRB), CRB65, and quick sequential organ failure assessment (qSOFA) in predicting intensive care unit (ICU) admission and in-hospital mortality of patients with urinary tract infections (UTI) compared with Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (SIRS). Methods: Data of patients with UTI who visited the emergency department of a single centre between February 2018 and March 2020 were retrospectively analysed. Baseline characteristics were compared with the prevalence of ICU admission and in-hospital mortality. The effectiveness of CRB, CRB-65, qSOFA, and SIRS as indicators of ICU admission and in-hospital mortality were evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curve. Results: Overall, 1151 patients were included, of whom 132 (11.5%) were admitted to the ICU and 30 (2.6%) succumbed to in-hospital mortality. AUROC values of CRB, CRB-65, and qSOFA as predictors of ICU admission and in-hospital mortality were similar. CRB score ≥1 had a sensitivity and specificity of 71.3% and 73.5%, respectively, for ICU admission; 66.7% and 69.2%, respectively, for in-hospital mortality. CRB-65 score ≥2 had a sensitivity and specificity of 61.2% and 80.9%, respectively, for ICU admissions; 60% and 76.9%, respectively, for in-hospital mortality. A qSOFA score ≥1 had a sensitivity and specificity of 71.3% and 79.6%, respectively, for ICU admission; 66.7% and 74.8%, respectively, for in-hospital mortality. AUROC values of SIRS were 0.580 and 0.617 respectively for ICU admission and in-hospital mortality, which showed lower predictive performance than those of the other three scoring systems. Conclusion: In ICU admission, CRB, CRB-65, and qSOFA have better predictive performance than SIRS. CRB-65 and qSOFA have superior performance compared to CRB and SIRS in predicting mortality.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

BAE, S. J., LEE, J. H., CHOI, Y. H. (2022). Comparison of Predictive Scoring Systems in Assessing Risk for Intensive Care Unit Admission and In-Hospital Mortality in Patients with Urinary Tract Infections. Journal of critical and intensive care (Online), Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 1, 25–31. https://ajindex.com/articles/562263

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (13)

  1. Ayres SM. SCCM’s new horizons conference on sepsis and septic shock. Crit Care Med. 1985
  2. 864–6. [CrossRef] 2. Balk RA, Bone RC. The septic syndrome. Definition and clinical implications. Crit Care Clin. 1989
  3. 1–8. [CrossRef] 3. Bone RC, Balk RA, Cerra FB, et al. Definitions for sepsis and organ failure and guidelines for the use of innovative therapies in sepsis. The ACCP/SCCM Consensus Conference Committee. American College of Chest Physicians/Society of Critical Care Medicine. Chest. 1992
  4. 1644–55. [CrossRef] 4. Levy MM, Fink MP, Marshall JC, et al. 2001 SCCM/ESICM/ACCP/ ATS/SIS International Sepsis Definitions Conference. Crit Care Med. 2003
  5. 1250–6. [CrossRef] 5. Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour CW, et al. The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA. 2016
  6. 801–10. [CrossRef] 6. Seymour CW, Liu VX, Iwashyna TJ, et al. Assessment of Clinical Criteria for Sepsis: For the Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA. 2016
  7. 762–74. [CrossRef] 7. Calle P, Cerro L, Valencia J, et al. Usefulness of severity scores in patients with suspected infection in the emergency department: a systematic review. J Emerg Med. 2012
  8. 379–91. [CrossRef] 8. Lim WS, van der Eerden MM, Laing R, et al. Defining community acquired pneumonia severity on presentation to hospital: an international derivation and validation study. Thorax. 2003
  9. 377– 82. [CrossRef] 9. Chen Y-X, Wang J-Y, Guo S-B. Use of CRB-65 and quick Sepsisrelated Organ Failure Assessment to predict site of care and mortality in pneumonia patients in the emergency department: a retrospective study. Crit Care. 2016
  10. [CrossRef] 10. Piano S, Bartoletti M, Tonon M, et al. Assessment of Sepsis-3 criteria and quick SOFA in patients with cirrhosis and bacterial infections. Gut. 2018
  11. 1892–99. [CrossRef] 11. Brun-Buisson C. The epidemiology of the systemic inflammatory response. Intensive Care Med. 2000
  12. S64–74. [CrossRef] 12. Jiang J, Yang J, Mei J, et al. Head-to-head comparison of qSOFA and SIRS criteria in predicting the mortality of infected patients in the emergency department: a meta-analysis. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2018
  13. [CrossRef] 13. Ramos-Rincon JM, Fernandez-Gil A, Merino E, et al. The quick Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) is a good predictor of in-hospital mortality in very elderly patients with bloodstream infections: A retrospective observational study. Sci