Dergiler / Journal of Clinical and Analytical Medicine / 2016 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 5

Farklı Yaş Gruplarında AMH ve FSH Arasındaki Diskordans Oranları

Discordance Rates Between AMH and FSH in Different Age Groups

Sayfa
621–624
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Data from our study and the literature lead us to conclude that age-based AMH and FSH levels and also that discordance between these parameters may vary among different ethnic groups

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Aim: To evaluate the discordance rates between anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) and follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) levels according to different age groups in a cohort of Turkish women.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Patients were divided into 4 groups as = 40 years to evaluate the discordance between AMH and FSH in terms of age.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Data from our study and the literature lead us to conclude that age-based AMH and FSH levels and also that discordance between these parameters may vary among different ethnic groups
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

Aim: To evaluate the discordance rates between anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) and follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) levels according to different age groups in a cohort of Turkish women. Material and Method: This retrospective study was conducted at infertility clinics of Zeynep Kamil Training and Research Hospital. Patients were divided into 4 groups as = 40 years to evaluate the discordance between AMH and FSH in terms of age. Discordance rates, and median level of AMH and of FSH were determined for each age group. Results: 467 patients who met the inclusion criteria were enrolled in the study. 35.1% (n=164), 28.3% (n=132), 22.7%(n=106), and 13.9% (n=65) of patients were = 40 years, respectively. The discordance rates in terms of normal AMH but abnormal FSH level were 4.2%, 6.7%, 11.0%, 17.9% in the =40 years age groups, respectively, whereas the discordance rates in terms of normal FSH but abnormal AMH levels were 6.2%, 8.5%, 16.7%, 17.9% in the same age groups, respectively. Discussion: Discordance rates steadily increased with advancing age both for concerning AMH-reassuring FSH and concerning FSH-reassuring AMH. Data from our study and the literature lead us to conclude that age-based AMH and FSH levels and also that discordance between these parameters may vary among different ethnic groups

Abstract

Amaç: Farklı yaş gruplarına göre anti-Müllerian hormon (AMH) ve folikül stimülan hormon (FSH) arasındaki diskordans oranının Türk kadın kohortunda araştırılması. Gereç ve Yöntem: Bu retrospektif çalışma, Zeynep Kamil Eğitim Araştırma Hastanesi infertilite kliniğinde gerçekleştirildi. Hastalar; yaş gruplarına göre AMH ve FSH arasındaki diskordansı değerlendirmek amacıyla = 40 yaş olmak üzere dört gruba ayrıldı. Diskordans oranı, AMH ve FSH median değerleri yaş gruplarına göre incelendi. Bulgular: Çalışmaya dahil edilme kriterlerini sağlayan 467 hasta çalışmaya dahil edildi. Hastaların %35.1'i (n=164) =40 yaş idi. Diskordans oranı normal AMH-anormal FSH değeri olan hastalar için =40 yaş hasta grupları için sırasıyla %4.2, %6.7, %11.0, %17.9 olarak saptandı. Normal FSH-anormal AMH değeri olan hastalarda diskordans oranı =40 yaş hasta grupları için sırasıyla %6.2, %8.5, %16.7, %17.9 olarak tespit edildi. Tartışma: Diskordans oranının normal AMH-anormal FSH değeri olan ve anormal AMH-normal FSH değeri olan Çalışmamızın sonuçları ve literatürdeki sonuçlara göre farklı etnik gruplarda AMH ve FSH arasındaki diskordans oranlarının ve yaşa göre AMH ve FSH düzeylerinin farklılık gösterebileceği düşünülmektedir.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

DEVRANOGLU, B., GÜNAYDIN, S., ÖZKAYA, E., SELÇUK, S., KÜÇÜKBAŞ, M., KUYUCU, M., KUTLU, H. T. (2022). Farklı Yaş Gruplarında AMH ve FSH Arasındaki Diskordans Oranları. Journal of Clinical and Analytical Medicine, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 5, 621–624. https://ajindex.com/articles/560925

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (13)

  1. Broekmans FJ, Kwee J, Hendriks DJ, Mol BW, Lambalk CB. A systematic review of tests predicting ovarian reserve and IVF outcome. Hum Reprod Update 2006; 12(6):685-718
  2. Singer T, Barad DH, Weghofer A, Gleicher N. Correlation of antimüllerian hormone and baseline follicle-stimulating hormone levels. Fertil Steril 2009; 91(6):2616-9
  3. Barad DH, Weghofer A, Gleicher N. Comparing anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) and follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) as predictors of ovarian function. Fertil Steril 2009; 91 (Suppl.4):S1553-5
  4. Burger HG, Dudley EC, Hopper JL, Shelley JM, Green A, Smith A, et al.The endocrinology of the menopausal transition: a cross-sectional study of a populationbased sample. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1995;80(12):3537-45
  5. Visser JA, de Jong FH, Laven JS, Themmen AP. Anti-Müllerian hormone: a new marker for ovarian function. Reproduction 2006;131(1):1-9
  6. N. Gleicher, A. Weghofer, D. H. Barad, Discordances between follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) and anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) in female infertility. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 2010;17(8):64
  7. Hussain M, Cahill D, Akande V, Gordon U. Discrepancies between Antimullerian Hormone and Follicle Stimulating Hormone in Assisted Reproduction. Obstet Gynecol Int 2013:383278
  8. T. Singer, D. H. Barad, A. Weghofer, N. Gleicher, Correlation of antimüllerian hormone and baseline follicle-stimulating hormone levels. Fertil Steril 2009;91(6):2616-9
  9. Leader B, Hegde A, Baca Q, Stone K, Lannon B, Seifer DB et al. High frequency of discordance between anti-Müllerian hormone and folliclestimulating hormone levels in serum from estradiol-confirmed days 2 to 4 of the menstrual cycle from 5,354 women in U.S. fertility centers. Fertil Steril 2012;98(4):1037-42
  10. T.Molinaro, A. Samra. Patients with discordant AMH and FSH have a better prognosis in in-vitro fertilization than those with two abnormal markers of ovarian reserve. Fertil Steril 2011;96(suppl.3):S199
  11. Butts SF, Seifer DB. Racial and ethnic differences in reproductive potential across the life cycle. Fertil Steril 2010;93(3):681-90
  12. Bleil ME, Gregorich SE, Adler NE, Sternfeld B, Rosen MP, Cedars MI. Race/ethnic disparities in reproductive age: an examination of ovarian reserve estimates across four race/ethnic groups of healthy, regularly cycling women. Fertil Steril 2014;101(1):199-207
  13. Sharara FI, McClamrock HD. Differences in in vitro fertilization (IVF) outcome between white and black women in an inner-city, university-based IV