Dergiler / Journal of childhood, education & society (Online) / 2020 / Cilt: 1 - Sayı: 1

Parents’ role in adolescents’ leisure time use: From goals to parenting practices

Sayfa
43–62
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

In that way, contemporary leisure settings reproduce rather than mitigate inequality in the use of leisure time.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Inspired by Ann Swidler’s toolkit theory, this qualitative study aims to achieve a better understanding of social class differences in parenting practices and, in turn, in young people’s leisure time use.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:To that end, 32 semi-structured face-to-face interviews with parents from middle- and working-class families were conducted in a small city in Belgium.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:In that way, contemporary leisure settings reproduce rather than mitigate inequality in the use of leisure time.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Inspired by Ann Swidler’s toolkit theory, this qualitative study aims to achieve a better understanding of social class differences in parenting practices and, in turn, in young people’s leisure time use. To that end, 32 semi-structured face-to-face interviews with parents from middle- and working-class families were conducted in a small city in Belgium. An inductive thematic analysis revealed substantial social class differences with respect to three parenting practices: (1) setting an example, (2) resolving conflicts and (3) facilitating leisure activities. The interviews showed that these differences were mainly linked to social class differences in parents’ resources: working-class parents more often lacked flexible time, financial resources, an extensive social network on which they could rely and the institutionally required attitudes, skills and experience to engage in the above-mentioned parenting practices. We conclude that young people’s (continued) institutional leisure participation puts high requirements on parents and not all (workingclass) parents are able to live up to such requirements. In that way, contemporary leisure settings reproduce rather than mitigate inequality in the use of leisure time.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Eecken, A. V. D., Spruyt, B., Bradt, L. (2022). Parents’ role in adolescents’ leisure time use: From goals to parenting practices. Journal of childhood, education & society (Online), Cilt: 1 - Sayı: 1, 43–62. https://ajindex.com/articles/560823

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (11)

  1. Agency Internal Governance & Research Department of the Flemish Government (2016). Municipal profile Ninove. Brussels: Agency Internal Governance and Research Department of the Flemish Government. Allison, K. R., Adlaf, E. M., Dwyer, J. J. M., Lysy, D. C., & Irving, H. M. (2007). The decline in physical activity among adolescent students: A cross-national comparison. Canadian Journal of Public Health, 98(2), 97–100.
  2. Bennett, P. R., Lutz, A. C., & Jayaram, L. (2012). Beyond the schoolyard: The role of parenting logics, financial resources and social institutions in the social class gap in structured activity participation. Sociology of Education, 85(2), 131–157.
  3. Bourdieu, P. (1986). Forms of capital. In J. G. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the Sociology of Education (pp. 241– 258). New York: Greenwoord Press.
  4. Bourdieu, P. (1993). The field of cultural production. UK: Polity Press.
  5. Council of Europe. (2003).
  6. Recommendation Rec (2003) 6 of the Committee of Ministers to member states on improving physical education and sport for children and young people in all European countries. Brussels: Council of Europe. Coussée, F. (2006). De pedagogiek van het jeugdwerk. Gent: Academia Press.
  7. Currid-Halkett, E. (2017). The sum of small things. A theory of the aspirational class. Oxford: Princeton University Press De Graaf, N. D., De Graaf, P. M., & Kraaykamp, G. (2000). Parental cultural capital and educational attainment in the Netherlands: A refinement of the cultural capital perspective. Sociology of Education, 73(2), 92–111.
  8. European Commission (2015). The contribution of youth work to address the challenges young people are facing, in particular the transition from education to employment. Results of the expert group set up under the European Union Work Plan for Youth for 2014-2015. Brussels: European Commission. Fawcett, L. M., Garton, A. F., & Dandy, J. (2009). Role of motivation, self-efficacy and parent support in adolescent structured leisure activity participation. Australian Journal of Psychology, 61(3), 175–182.
  9. Fletcher, A. C., Elder, G. H., & Mekos, D. (2000). Parental influences on adolescent involvement in community activities. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 10(1), 29–48.
  10. Furlong, A., & Cartmel, F. (2007). Young people and social change. New Perspectives. England: Open University Press.
  11. Geudens, T., Costanzo, S. Hofmann, P., Amorim, L., & Pavlovova, L. (2013). T-KIT. International voluntary service. Strasbourg: Council of Eur