Dergiler / Joint diseases and related surgery / 2020 / Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 1

Tranexamic Acid Decreases the Risk of Revision for Acute and Delayed Periprosthetic Joint Infection After Total Knee Replacement

Sayfa
8–13
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

We think that the preoperative intravenous use of TA may be an effective, safe and inexpensive method for the prevention of PJI.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Objectives: This study aims to analyze the effect of intravenous administration of tranexamic acid (TA) on reducing the risk of revision for acute and delayed periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) after primary total knee replacement (TKR).Patients and methods: This prospective observational cohort study included 1,529 TKRs (396 males, 1,133 females; mean age 67.8 years; range, 44 to 85.1 years) performed between January 2003 and October 2017.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:We analyzed the revision rate for acute and delayed PJI in a group of 787 TKRs with preoperatively intravenously administered TA (TA group) in comparison with a group of 742 TKRs without administration of TA (non-TA group).
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:We think that the preoperative intravenous use of TA may be an effective, safe and inexpensive method for the prevention of PJI.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2003 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Objectives: This study aims to analyze the effect of intravenous administration of tranexamic acid (TA) on reducing the risk of revision for acute and delayed periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) after primary total knee replacement (TKR).Patients and methods: This prospective observational cohort study included 1,529 TKRs (396 males, 1,133 females; mean age 67.8 years; range, 44 to 85.1 years) performed between January 2003 and October 2017. We analyzed the revision rate for acute and delayed PJI in a group of 787 TKRs with preoperatively intravenously administered TA (TA group) in comparison with a group of 742 TKRs without administration of TA (non-TA group). Multiple logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate significant predictors of TKR revision for acute and delayed PJI. Results: Revision surgery due to PJI was recorded in one patient in the TA group and eight patients in the non-TA group. Cumulative revision rate of TKR was significantly lower in the TA group (0.13% vs. 1.08%, hazard ratio 0.113; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.0147-0.937; p=0.043). Multivariate logistic regression analysis confirmed two predictors of revision: being aged over 75 years at the time of primary surgery (odds ratio [OR] 8.464; 95% CI: 2.016-35.54; p=0.004) and male gender (OR: 7.9; 95% CI: 1.879-33.26; p=0.005). The use of TA was shown as the significant protective factor (OR: 0.109; 95% CI: 0.0128-0.929; p=0.043). Conclusion: We have found a lower cumulative revision rate of TKR for acute and delayed PJI when TA was used. We think that the preoperative intravenous use of TA may be an effective, safe and inexpensive method for the prevention of PJI.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

LACKO, M., JARCUSKA, P., SCHEİEROVA, D., LACKOVA, A., GHARAİBEH, A. (2022). Tranexamic Acid Decreases the Risk of Revision for Acute and Delayed Periprosthetic Joint Infection After Total Knee Replacement. Joint diseases and related surgery, Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 1, 8–13. https://ajindex.com/articles/559305

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (10)

  1. Carr AJ, Robertsson O, Graves S, Price AJ, Arden NK, Judge A, et al. Knee replacement. Lancet 2012;379:1331-40.
  2. Postler A, Lützner C, Beyer F, Tille E, Lützner J. Analysis of total knee arthroplasty revision causes. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2018;19:55. Lum ZC, Shieh AK, Dorr LD. Why total knees fail-A modern perspective review. World J Orthop 2018;9:60-4.
  3. Zimmerli W, Trampuz A, Ochsner PE. Prosthetic-joint infections. N Engl J Med 2004;351:1645-54.
  4. Fillingham YA, Ramkumar DB, Jevsevar DS, Yates AJ, Shores P, Mullen K, et al. The efficacy of tranexamic acid in total knee arthroplasty: a network meta-analysis. J Arthroplasty 2018;33:3090-98.e1. Taneja A, El-Bakoury A, Khong H, Railton P, Sharma R, Johnston KD, et al. Association between allogeneic blood transfusion and wound infection after total hip or knee arthroplasty: A retrospective case-control study. J Bone Jt Infect 2019;4:99-105.
  5. Youssef LA, Spitalnik SL. Transfusion-related immunomodulation: a reappraisal. Curr Opin Hematol 2017;24:551-7.
  6. Viola J, Gomez MM, Restrepo C, Maltenfort MG, Parvizi J. Preoperative anemia increases postoperative complications and mortality following total joint arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2015;30:846-8.
  7. Alshryda S, Sarda P, Sukeik M, Nargol A, Blenkinsopp J, Mason JM. Tranexamic acid in total knee replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2011;93:1577-85.
  8. Parvizi J, Gehrke T. International consensus on periprosthetic joint infection: let cumulative wisdom be a guide. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2014;96:441. Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry. Annual Report. Adelaide: AOA; 2018. https://aoanjrr.sahmri.com/annual-reports-2018 Registry NJ. National Joint Registry. 15th Annual Report 2018 - National Joint Registry for England, Wales, Northern Ireland and the Isle of Man; 2018. Registry SKA. The Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Register. Annual Report 2018. 2018.
  9. Solarino G, Abate A, Vicenti G, Spinarelli A, Piazzolla A, Moretti B. Reducing periprosthetic joint infection: what really counts? Joints 2016;3:208-14.
  10. Yazdi H, Klement MR, Hammad M, Inoue D, Xu C, Goswami K, et al. Tranexamic acid is associated with reduced periprosthetic joint infection after primary total joint arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2019 Oct 22. pii: S0883-5403(19)31006-X. Vinckier F, Vermylen J. Wound healing following dental extractions in rabbits: effects of tranexamic acid, warfarin anti-coagulation, and socket packing. J Dent Res 1984;63:646-9. B