Dergiler / Joint diseases and related surgery / 2020 / Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 3

Can the complications of distal locking be prevented with a new nail that offers a novel locking technique in the treatment of humeral shaft fractures?

Sayfa
470–475
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Thus, it is possible to avoid complications that may occur during and after distal locking in conventional intramedullary nail implementations.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Objectives: This study aims to investigate whether complications related to distal locking can be prevented with InSafeLOCK® nail in the treatment of humeral shaft fractures.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Patients and methods: Hospital records of 31 patients (15 males, 16 females; mean age 54.4±10.1 years; range, 20 to 86 years) treated with InSafeLOCK® nail for humeral shaft fractures were investigated retrospectively between February 2016 and January 2019.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Thus, it is possible to avoid complications that may occur during and after distal locking in conventional intramedullary nail implementations.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2016 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Objectives: This study aims to investigate whether complications related to distal locking can be prevented with InSafeLOCK® nail in the treatment of humeral shaft fractures. Patients and methods: Hospital records of 31 patients (15 males, 16 females; mean age 54.4±10.1 years; range, 20 to 86 years) treated with InSafeLOCK® nail for humeral shaft fractures were investigated retrospectively between February 2016 and January 2019. AO (Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen) classification was used to determine the type of fracture. During the implementation, the elapsed time for distal locking was investigated. Complications encountered during both implementation and postoperative follow-up were investigated. Results: Fourteen of the fractures were type A, 12 were type B, and five were type C. The mean follow-up time was 18.2 (range, 6 to 30.5) months. The mean duration for distal locking was 2.1 (range, 1.2 to 3.1) minutes. In one (3.2%) patient, cortical penetration occurred at the anterior cortex of the humerus at distal to the nail. In one patient, nail breakage occurred at the distal part of the nail. In one patient, rotational instability occurred due to screw loosening. Conclusion: InSafeLOCK® humeral nail is safe when applied with the recommended technique. It can easily be applied without damaging the veins, nerves or other soft tissues around the elbow due to the internal distal locking feature; furthermore, there is no need to use fluoroscopy or targeting guide. Thus, it is possible to avoid complications that may occur during and after distal locking in conventional intramedullary nail implementations.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

DEMİRTAŞ, A., TÜRKMEN, İ., AKPINAR, F., UYGUR, M. E., ÖZKUT, A. T. (2022). Can the complications of distal locking be prevented with a new nail that offers a novel locking technique in the treatment of humeral shaft fractures?. Joint diseases and related surgery, Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 3, 470–475. https://ajindex.com/articles/559293

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (14)

  1. Tsai CH, Fong YC, Chen YH, Hsu CJ, Chang CH, Hsu HC. The epidemiology of traumatic humeral shaft fractures in Taiwan. Int Orthop 2009;33:463-7
  2. Wali MG, Baba AN, Latoo IA, Bhat NA, Baba OK, Sharma S. Internal fixation of shaft humerus fractures by dynamic compression plate or interlocking intramedullary nail: a prospective, randomised study. Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr 2014;9:133-40
  3. Baltov A, Mihail R, Dian E. Complications after interlocking intramedullary nailing of humeral shaft fractures. Injury 2014;45 Suppl 1:S9-S15
  4. Watson JT, Sanders RW. Controlled compression nailing for at risk humeral shaft fractures. J Orthop Trauma 2017;31 Suppl 6:S25-S8
  5. Janssen SJ, Bramer JAM, Guitton TG, Hornicek FJ, Schwab JH. Management of metastatic humeral fractures: Variations according to orthopedic subspecialty, tumor characteristics. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2018;104:59-65
  6. Akpinar F, Aydinlioğlu A, Tosun N, Doğan A, Tuncay I, Unal O. A morphometric study on the humerus for intramedullary fixation. Tohoku J Exp Med 2003;199:35-42
  7. Yi JW, Lee JS, Cho HJ. Retrograde intramedullary nailing for humerus fracture in a supine position: Performing an unfamiliar procedure in a familiar position. Clin Orthop Surg 2017;9:392-5
  8. Persiani P, Gurzi M, Moreschini O, Di Giacomo G, Villani C. Fluoroscopic freehand and electromagnetic-guided targeting system for distal locking screws of humeral intramedullary nail. Musculoskelet Surg 2017;101:19-23
  9. Tasci M, Turkmen İ, Celik H, Akcal MA, Şekerci R, Keles N, et al. InSafeLock humeral nail provides a safe application for proximal and distal locking screws with distal endopin - An anatomical study. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2019;105:1005-11
  10. Erden T, Kapicioglu M, Demirtas A, Bilsel K, Akpinar F, Kuduz H. Biomechanical comparison of humeral nails with different distal locking mechanisms: Insafelock nails versus conventional locking nails. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 2019;53:490-6
  11. Atik OŞ. Every new technique either conservative or surgical is good? Eklem Hastalik Cerrahisi 2019;30:183-4
  12. McCormack RG, Brien D, Buckley RE, McKee MD, Powell J, Schemitsch EH. Fixation of fractures of the shaft of the humerus by dynamic compression plate or intramedullary nail. A prospective, randomised trial. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2000;82:336-9
  13. Sügün TS, Ozaksar K, Toros T, Kayalar M, Bal E, Ozerkan F. Humeral shaft nonunions: plates and nails. Eklem Hastalik Cerrahisi 2012;23:150-5
  14. Bhandari M, Devere