Dergiler / Joint diseases and related surgery / 2020 / Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 2

Research into biocompatibility and cytotoxicity of daptomycin, gentamicin, vancomycin and teicoplanin antibiotics at common doses added to bone cement

Sayfa
328–334
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

When selecting antibiotics to be added to bone cement, care should be taken that the antibiotic is non-toxic and biocompatible.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Objectives: This study aims to investigate the biocompatibility and cytotoxicity of daptomycin, gentamicin, vancomycin and teicoplanin at commonly-used dose intervals added to polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) in vitro.Materials and methods: This prospective study was conducted between February 2016 and June 2016.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The antibiotic doses added were teicoplanin (2 g, 3 g, 4 g), gentamicin (0.5 g, 0.75 g, 1 g), daptomycin (0.5 g.) and vancomycin (2 g, 3 g, 4 g).
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:When selecting antibiotics to be added to bone cement, care should be taken that the antibiotic is non-toxic and biocompatible.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2016 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Objectives: This study aims to investigate the biocompatibility and cytotoxicity of daptomycin, gentamicin, vancomycin and teicoplanin at commonly-used dose intervals added to polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) in vitro.Materials and methods: This prospective study was conducted between February 2016 and June 2016. Antibiotics were added to PMMA at doses frequently used in clinical practice. The antibiotic doses added were teicoplanin (2 g, 3 g, 4 g), gentamicin (0.5 g, 0.75 g, 1 g), daptomycin (0.5 g.) and vancomycin (2 g, 3 g, 4 g). Standard cement balls (10 mm) were created. Activated L929 mouse fibroblast cell culture was used for incubation. Agar diffusion, Cell Proliferation Kit II (XTT) test and electron microscope investigations were performed to examine biocompatibility and cytotoxicity.Results: In the cytotoxicity test, teicoplanin at 4 g and daptomycin at 0.5 g doses were observed to cause reductions in viability percentages. The same doses caused 20% and 20-40% cell lysis indices during the agar diffusion test. On electron microscope images, cytotoxic effects in fibroblast cells and involvement with the surface of cement balls were observed.Conclusion: Gentamicin, vancomycin and teicoplanin were observed to be non-toxic and biocompatible at commonly-used dose intervals. Teicoplanin at 4 g and daptomycin at 0.5 g doses were identified to be cytotoxic and not biocompatible. When selecting antibiotics to be added to bone cement, care should be taken that the antibiotic is non-toxic and biocompatible.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

PAZARCI, Ö., KILINÇ, S., TUNÇ, T., SÜMER, Z. (2022). Research into biocompatibility and cytotoxicity of daptomycin, gentamicin, vancomycin and teicoplanin antibiotics at common doses added to bone cement. Joint diseases and related surgery, Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 2, 328–334. https://ajindex.com/articles/559273

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (16)

  1. Anagnostakos K, Fürst O, Kelm J. Antibiotic-impregnated PMMA hip spacers: Current status. Acta Orthop 2006;77:628-3 7
  2. Issın A, Koçkara N. Simple method for increasing drug elution from polymethylmethacrylate bone cement. Eklem Hastalik Cerrahisi 2017;28:100-6
  3. Zimmerli W, Trampuz A, Ochsner PE. Prosthetic-joint infections. N Engl J Med 2004;351:1645-54
  4. Atıcı T, Şahin N, Çavun S, Özakin C, Kaleli T. Antibiotic release and antibacterial efficacy in cement spacers and cement beads impregnated with different techniques: In vitro study. Eklem Hastalik Cerrahisi 2018;29:71-8
  5. Buchholz HW, Engelbrecht H. Uber die Depot effects of various antibiotics mixed with Palacos resins. Chirurg 1970;41:511-5
  6. Jagadale V, Achilike R, Nord KM. Daptomycin-tobramycin cement beads have lethal local antibacterial effect in resistant periprosthetic joint infections. Cureus 2019;11:e5726
  7. Vaishya R, Chauhan M, Vaish A. Bone cement. J Clin Orthop Trauma 2013;4:157-63
  8. Küçükdurmaz F, Tuncay İ. Antibiyotikli çimento ve spacer uygulamaları. TOTBİD Dergisi 2016;15:115-9
  9. Bistolfi A, Massazza G, Verné E, Massè A, Deledda D, Ferraris S, et al. Antibiotic-loaded cement in orthopedic surgery: a review. ISRN Orthop 2011;2011:290851
  10. Hendriks JG, van Horn JR, van der Mei HC, Busscher HJ. Backgrounds of antibiotic-loaded bone cement and prosthesis-related infection. Biomaterials 2004;25:545-56
  11. Ergün G, Sağesen L, Doğan A, Özkul A, Demirel E. Protez kaide materyallerinin sitotoksisitesinin agar difüzyon ve filtre difüzyon test yöntemleri ile incelenmesi. Gazi Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi 2006;23:31-7
  12. Bertazzoni Minelli E, Caveiari C, Benini A. Release of antibiotics from polymethylmethacrylate cement. J Chemother 2002;14:492-500
  13. Hanssen AD. Local antibiotic delivery vehicles in the treatment of musculoskeletal infection. Clin Orthop Relat Res 20 05;437:91- 6. 14. van de Belt H, Neut D, Schenk W, van Horn JR, van der Mei HC, Busscher HJ. Infection of orthopedic implants and the use of antibiotic-loaded bone cements. A review. Acta Orthop Scand 2001;72:557-71
  14. Nelson CL. The current status of material used for depot delivery of drugs. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2004;427:72-8
  15. Göçer H, Emir D, Önger ME, Dabak N. Effects of bone cement loaded with teicoplanin, N-acetylcysteine or their combination on Staphylococcus aureus biofilm formation: an in vitro study. Eklem Hastalik Cerrahisi 2017;28:13-8
  16. Öztemür Z, Sümer Z, Tunç T, Paz