Dergiler / Joint diseases and related surgery / 2021 / Cilt: 32 - Sayı: 2

Comparison of anterior single- and standard two-portal techniques in arthroscopic Bankart repair

Sayfa
437–445
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Good-to-excellentpostoperative functional and clinical outcomes were achieved inboth groups at the final follow-up, compared to baseline (p

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Objectives: This study aims to compare the outcomes of patientsundergoing a single anterior portal or a standard two-portalarthroscopic procedure for Bankart repair.Patients and methods: Between January 2015 and March 2018,a total of 71 consecutive patients (53 males and 18 females; mean age:33.3±10.3 years; range, 17 to 56 years) who underwent arthroscopicBankart repair with a minimum two-year follow-up period wereincluded.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The patients were divided into two groups according to thearthroscopic technique used: single anterior portal group (Group 1,n=32) and standard two-portal group (Group 2, n=39).
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Good-to-excellentpostoperative functional and clinical outcomes were achieved inboth groups at the final follow-up, compared to baseline (p
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2015 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Objectives: This study aims to compare the outcomes of patientsundergoing a single anterior portal or a standard two-portalarthroscopic procedure for Bankart repair.Patients and methods: Between January 2015 and March 2018,a total of 71 consecutive patients (53 males and 18 females; mean age:33.3±10.3 years; range, 17 to 56 years) who underwent arthroscopicBankart repair with a minimum two-year follow-up period wereincluded. The patients were divided into two groups according to thearthroscopic technique used: single anterior portal group (Group 1,n=32) and standard two-portal group (Group 2, n=39). Demographicand surgical characteristics of the patients were recorded. Pre- andpostoperative clinical and functional outcomes were evaluatedusing the external rotation degree, as well as Visual Analog Scale(VAS), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES), Universityof California at Los Angeles (UCLA) Shoulder Rating Scale,Constant-Murley Score (CMS), Oxford Shoulder Instability Score(OSIS), and Rowe scores. The clinical and functional outcomes andrevision rates were compared between the groups.Results: The mean follow-up was 32.0±7.4 months in Group 1and 38.0±13.4 months in Group 2 (p=0.222). Good-to-excellentpostoperative functional and clinical outcomes were achieved inboth groups at the final follow-up, compared to baseline (p

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

GÜNEY, A., TOPAK, D., DOĞAR, F., UZUN, E. (2022). Comparison of anterior single- and standard two-portal techniques in arthroscopic Bankart repair. Joint diseases and related surgery, Cilt: 32 - Sayı: 2, 437–445. https://ajindex.com/articles/559191

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (13)

  1. Sarıkaya B, Bozkurt C, Gül O, Bekin Sarıkaya PZ, Sipahioğlu S, Altay MA. Comparison of the clinical results of isolated Bankart and SLAP 5 lesions after arthroscopic repair. Jt Dis Relat Surg 2020;31:223-9
  2. Ng DZ, Lau BPH, Tan BHM, Kumar VP. Single working portal technique for knotless arthroscopic Bankart repair. Arthrosc Tech 2017;6:e1989-e1992
  3. Flinkkilä T, Knape R, Sirniö K, Ohtonen P, Leppilahti J. Long-term results of arthroscopic Bankart repair: Minimum 10 years of follow-up. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2018;26:94-9
  4. An VV, Sivakumar BS, Phan K, Trantalis J. A systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical and patient-reported outcomes following two procedures for recurrent traumatic anterior instability of the shoulder: Latarjet procedure vs. Bankart repair. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2016;25:853-63
  5. Ghai A, Sachdeva J, Sood M, Sud A, Chauhan M, Singh S. Similar functional outcome using single anterior portal and standard two portals technique in recurrent dislocation of shoulder. Chin J Traumatol 2020;23:102-6
  6. Castagna A, Garofalo R, Conti M, Flanagin B. Arthroscopic Bankart repair: Have we finally reached a gold standard? Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2016;24:398-405
  7. Meyer M, Graveleau N, Hardy P, Landreau P. Anatomic risks of shoulder arthroscopy portals: anatomic cadaveric study of 12 portals. Arthroscopy 2007;23:529-36
  8. Maffet MW, Gartsman GM, Moseley B. Superior labrumbiceps tendon complex lesions of the shoulder. Am J Sports Med 1995;23:93-8
  9. Samilson RL, Prieto V. Dislocation arthropathy of the shoulder. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1983;65:456-60
  10. Shin SJ, Kim RG, Jeon YS, Kwon TH. Critical value of anterior glenoid bone loss that leads to recurrent glenohumeral instability after arthroscopic Bankart repair. Am J Sports Med 2017;45:1975-81
  11. Sebastiá-Forcada E, Martínez-Rico S, Vizcaya-Moreno MF, Lizaur-Utrilla A. Prospective study on effectiveness and safety of arthroscopic Bankart using a single anterior portal for patients with anterior shoulder instability. Rev Esp Cir Ortop Traumatol 2019;63:431-8
  12. Sugaya H, Moriishi J, Kanisawa I, Tsuchiya A. Arthroscopic osseous Bankart repair for chronic recurrent traumatic anterior glenohumeral instability. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2005;87:1752-60
  13. King GJ, Richards RR, Zuckerman JD, Blasier R, Dillman C, Friedman RJ, et al. A standardized method for assessment of elbow function. Research Committee, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons. J Shoulder Elbo