KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Joint diseases and related surgery / 2022 / Cilt: 33 - Sayı: 1

Diagnosis of osteoarthritic changes, loss of cervical lordosis, and disc space narrowing on cervical radiographs with deep learning methods

Semra DURAN
Yüksel MARAŞ
Hakan MARAŞ
Ebru ATALAR
Gül TOKDEMİR
Kemal ÜRETEN
Sayfa
93–101
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Such a supportive tool may reduce the diagnosis time and provide radiologists or clinicians to have more time to interpret abnormal graphs.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Objectives: In this study, we aimed to differentiate normal cervical graphs and graphs of diseases that cause mechanical neck pain by using deep convolutional neural networks (DCNN) technology.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Materials and methods: In this retrospective study, the convolutional neural networks were used and transfer learning method was applied with the pre-trained VGG-16, VGG-19, Resnet-101, and DenseNet-201 networks.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Such a supportive tool may reduce the diagnosis time and provide radiologists or clinicians to have more time to interpret abnormal graphs.
🔬Tür:Modelleme & Sayısal Simülasyon
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Objectives: In this study, we aimed to differentiate normal cervical graphs and graphs of diseases that cause mechanical neck pain by using deep convolutional neural networks (DCNN) technology. Materials and methods: In this retrospective study, the convolutional neural networks were used and transfer learning method was applied with the pre-trained VGG-16, VGG-19, Resnet-101, and DenseNet-201 networks. Our data set consisted of 161 normal lateral cervical radiographs and 170 lateral cervical radiographs with osteoarthritis and cervical degenerative disc disease. Results: We compared the performances of the classification models in terms of performance metrics such as accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and precision metrics. Pre-trained VGG-16 network outperformed other models in terms of accuracy (93.9%), sensitivity (95.8%), specificity (92.0%), and precision (92.0%) results. Conclusion: The results of this study suggest that the deep learning methods are promising support tool in automated control of cervical graphs using the DCNN and the exclusion of normal graphs. Such a supportive tool may reduce the diagnosis time and provide radiologists or clinicians to have more time to interpret abnormal graphs.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

DURAN, S., MARAŞ, Y., MARAŞ, H., ATALAR, E., TOKDEMİR, G., ÜRETEN, K. (2022). Diagnosis of osteoarthritic changes, loss of cervical lordosis, and disc space narrowing on cervical radiographs with deep learning methods. Joint diseases and related surgery, Cilt: 33 - Sayı: 1, 93–101. https://ajindex.com/articles/559181

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (15)

  1. Cohen SP. Epidemiology, diagnosis, and treatment of neck pain. Mayo Clin Proc 2015;90:284-99
  2. Lim J, Kim J, Cheon S. A deep neural network-based method for early detection of osteoarthritis using statistical data. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2019;16:1281
  3. Kerlikowske K, Carney PA, Geller B, Mandelson MT, Taplin SH, Malvin K, et al. Performance of screening mammography among women with and without a firstdegree relative with breast cancer. Ann Intern Med 2000;133:855-63
  4. Someeh N, Asghari Jafarabadi M, Shamshirgaran SM, Farzipoor F. The outcome in patients with brain stroke: A deep learning neural network modeling. J Res Med Sci 2020;25:78
  5. Olsen TG, Jackson BH, Feeser TA, Kent MN, Moad JC, Krishnamurthy S, et al. Diagnostic performance of deep learning algorithms applied to three common diagnoses in dermatopathology. J Pathol Inform 2018;9:32
  6. Xu L, Walker B, Liang PI, Tong Y, Xu C, Su YC, et al. Colorectal cancer detection based on deep learning. J Pathol Inform 2020;11:28
  7. Samala RK, Chan HP, Hadjiiski LM, Helvie MA, Cha KH, Richter CD. Multi-task transfer learning deep convolutional neural network: Application to computeraided diagnosis of breast cancer on mammograms. Phys Med Biol 2017;62:8894-908
  8. Yosinski J, Clune J, Bengio Y, Lipson H. How transferable are features in deep neural networks? Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 2014;27:3320-8
  9. Simonyan K, Zisserman A. Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognition. 3rd International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR). San Diego, May 7-9, 2015. arXiv: 1409.1556. ICLR; 2015
  10. He K, Zhang X, Ren S, Sun J. Deep residual learning for image recognition. 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) 2016:770-8
  11. Huang G, Liu Z, Van Der Maaten L, Weinberger KQ. Densely connected convolutional networks. 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) 2017:2261-9
  12. Polat H, Danaei Mehr H. Classification of pulmonary CT images by using hybrid 3D-deep convolutional neural network architecture. Applied Sciences 2019;9:940
  13. Yahalomi E, Chernofsky M, Werman M, editors. Detection of distal radius fractures trained by a small set of X-ray images and faster R-CNN. Cham: Springer; 2019
  14. Kim DH, MacKinnon T. Artificial intelligence in fracture detection: Transfer learning from deep convolutional neural networks. Clin Radiol 2018;73:439-45
  15. Olczak J, Fahlberg N, Maki A, Razavian A