Dergiler / Joint diseases and related surgery / 2022 / Cilt: 33 - Sayı: 1

Thumb duplication classifications: Is there still a need for improvement?

Sayfa
156–161
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Conclusion: Despite efforts to find the best classification system for thumb duplications, the proposed systems may not fully cover the presented radial polydactyly cases, and additions to the system are required.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Objectives: This study aims to compare the usefulness of two systems in classifying thumb duplication cases and give some examples of the cases we believe that are unclassifiable.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Patients and methods: Between January 2011 and January 2018, a total of 50 patients (29 males, 21 females; median age: 46.4±68.3 months; range, 1 to 318 months) with thumb duplications as assessed according to the Wassel and Rotterdam classification systems were included.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Conclusion: Despite efforts to find the best classification system for thumb duplications, the proposed systems may not fully cover the presented radial polydactyly cases, and additions to the system are required.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2011 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Objectives: This study aims to compare the usefulness of two systems in classifying thumb duplication cases and give some examples of the cases we believe that are unclassifiable. Patients and methods: Between January 2011 and January 2018, a total of 50 patients (29 males, 21 females; median age: 46.4±68.3 months; range, 1 to 318 months) with thumb duplications as assessed according to the Wassel and Rotterdam classification systems were included. Results: Duplication was present in the right hand in 28, in the left hand in 21, and in both hands in one patient. According to the Wassel classification system, 45 patients could be allocated in any of the types; however, five patients could not be classified. According to the Rotterdam classification, 47 cases fell into one of the classifications; however, three cases could not be classified. Conclusion: Despite efforts to find the best classification system for thumb duplications, the proposed systems may not fully cover the presented radial polydactyly cases, and additions to the system are required.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ÜNKAR, E. A., ÖZTÜRK, K., ÜÇPUNAR, H., BAYDAR, M., ŞENCAN, A., DEMİRKAYNAK, E. (2022). Thumb duplication classifications: Is there still a need for improvement?. Joint diseases and related surgery, Cilt: 33 - Sayı: 1, 156–161. https://ajindex.com/articles/559158

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (16)

  1. Tay SC, Moran SL, Shin AY, Cooney WP 3rd. The hypoplastic thumb. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2006;14:354-66
  2. Mauck BM, Jobe MT. Congenital anomalies of the hand. In: Azar FM, Beaty JH, Canale ST, editors. Campbell’s operative orthopaedics. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2017. p. 3826-910
  3. Lin S, Tong K, Zhang G, Cao S, Zhong Z, Wang G. Clinical characteristics and distribution of thumb polydactyly in South China: A retrospective analysis of 483 hands. J Hand Surg Am 2020;45:938-46
  4. Jalili A, Najd Mazhar F. An unusual case of radial polydactyly, (tetraplication of the thumb, duplication of the radial carpal bones and bifurcation of the radius). Med J Islam Repub Iran 2014;28:81
  5. Yildirim S, Taylan G, Aydoğdu E, Aköz T. The true triplication of the thumb: A case of unclassified thumb polydactyly. Ann Plast Surg 2005;55:321-3
  6. Wassel HD. The results of surgery for polydactyly of the thumb. A review. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1969;64:175-93
  7. Manske MC, Kennedy CD, Huang JI. Classifications in brief: The Wassel classification for radial polydactyly. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2017;475:1740-6
  8. Zuidam JM, Selles RW, Ananta M, Runia J, Hovius SE. A classification system of radial polydactyly: Inclusion of triphalangeal thumb and triplication. J Hand Surg Am 2008;33:373-7
  9. Chung MS, Baek GH, Gong HS, Lee HJ, Kim J, Rhee SH. Radial polydactyly: Proposal for a new classification system based on the 159 duplicated thumbs. J Pediatr Orthop 2013;33:190-6
  10. Upton J. Invited discussion: The true triplication of the thumb: A case of unclassified thumb polydactyly. Ann Plast Surg 2005;55:324-6
  11. Boutros S, Weinfeld AB, Stafford J, Friedman J. An unusual case of polydactyly of the thumb. Ann Plast Surg 1998;41:434-5
  12. Iba K, Wada T, Yamashita T. Atypical thumb polydactyly with duplicated metacarpal bone: A report of 2 cases. Ann Plast Surg 2013;70:38-41
  13. Jafari D, Shariatzade H, Mazhar FN, Abbasgholizadeh B, Dashtebozorgh A. An unusual case of preaxial polydactyly of the hand (triplication of the thumbs). Med J Islam Repub Iran 2013;27:91-4
  14. Dijkman RR, van Nieuwenhoven CA, Selles RW, Habenicht R, Hovius SER. A multicenter comparative study of two classification systems for radial polydactyly. Plast Reconstr Surg 2014;134:991-1001
  15. Cabrera González M, Pérez López LM, Martínez Soto G, Gutiérrez de la Iglesia D. Prognostic value of age and Wassel classification in the reconstruction of thumb duplication. J Child Orthop 2013;7:551-7
  16. Hu CH, Thompso