KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / İstanbul Medical Journal / 2022 / Cilt: 23 - Sayı: 2

The Diagnostic Efficiency of the Use of Non-Standard Surgical Instruments in Mediastinoscopy

Levent CANSEVER
Mehmet Ali BEDİRHAN
Yunus SEYREK
Kemal KARAPINAR
Cemal AKER
Merve ÖZBEK
Ali Murat AKÇIL
Sayfa
96–101
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Results: The use of NSSI was found to be statistically significantly higher in patients with previous EBUS-TBNA (p=0.013), in operations in which a single mediastinal station was sampled (p=0.004), and in cases where the pathological diagnosis was tuberculosis (TB) (p

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Introduction: Mediastinoscopy is an effective diagnostic method used in the diagnosing of benign granulomatous diseases and for lung cancer staging.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Methods: One hundred and seven patients who underwent mediastinoscopy were divided into two groups according to the use of SSI (n=89) and NSSI (n=18).
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Results: The use of NSSI was found to be statistically significantly higher in patients with previous EBUS-TBNA (p=0.013), in operations in which a single mediastinal station was sampled (p=0.004), and in cases where the pathological diagnosis was tuberculosis (TB) (p
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Introduction: Mediastinoscopy is an effective diagnostic method used in the diagnosing of benign granulomatous diseases and for lung cancer staging. However, the success of this method is directly proportional to the amount of pathological material taken. This study aimed to compare the diagnostic efficiency of the diagnostic superiority of the use of standard surgical instruments (SSI) and non-standard surgical instruments (NSSI) in mediastinoscopy in patients with mediastinal lymph nodes, which are thought to be pathological, according to different diseases. Methods: One hundred and seven patients who underwent mediastinoscopy were divided into two groups according to the use of SSI (n=89) and NSSI (n=18). Analysis was made of age, gender, pre-diagnosis, fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography and substance uptake values of the groups, pathology if endobronchial ultrasound-transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) had been performed, operation notes (use of video mediastinoscope, use of SSI or NSSI, sampled mediastinal lymph node stations), complications and pathology results analyzed. Results: The use of NSSI was found to be statistically significantly higher in patients with previous EBUS-TBNA (p=0.013), in operations in which a single mediastinal station was sampled (p=0.004), and in cases where the pathological diagnosis was tuberculosis (TB) (p

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

CANSEVER, L., BEDİRHAN, M. A., SEYREK, Y., KARAPINAR, K., AKER, C., ÖZBEK, M., AKÇIL, A. M. (2022). The Diagnostic Efficiency of the Use of Non-Standard Surgical Instruments in Mediastinoscopy. İstanbul Medical Journal, Cilt: 23 - Sayı: 2, 96–101. https://ajindex.com/articles/551743

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (13)

  1. Kelemen JJ, Naunheim KS. Minimally invasive approaches to mediastinal neoplasms. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2000; 12: 301-6
  2. Ginsberg RJ. Evaluation of the mediastinum by invasive techniques. Surg Clin North Am 1987; 67: 1025-35
  3. Cheng G, Mahajan A, Oh S, Benzaquen S, Chen A. Endobronchial ultrasoundguided intranodal forceps biopsy (EBUS-IFB)-technical review. J Thorac Dis 2019; 11: 4049-58
  4. Wood DE, Kazerooni E, Baum SL, Dransfield MT, Eapen GA, Ettinger DS, et al; National comprehension cancer network. Lung cancer screening, version 1.2015: featured updates to the NCCN guidelines. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2015; 13: 23-34
  5. Silvestri GA, Gonzalez AV, Jantz MA, Margolis ML, Gould MK, Tanoue LT, et al. Methods for staging non-small cell lung cancer: Diagnosis and management of lung cancer, 3rd ed: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. Chest 2013; 143(Suppl5): e211-50
  6. Gould MK, Kuschner WG, Rydzak CE, Maclean CC, Demas AN, Shigemitsu H, et al. Test performance of positron emission tomography and computed tomography for mediastinal staging in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med 2003; 139: 879-92
  7. Di Felice C, Young B, Matta M. Comparison of specimen adequacy and diagnostic accuracy of a 25-gauge and 22-gauge needle in endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration. J Thorac Dis 2019; 11: 3643-9
  8. Chen C, Huang JA. How to increase the yield of transbronchial needle aspiration (TBNA)?. J Thorac Dis. 2015; 7(Suppl 4): S238-45
  9. Lazzaro RS, LoCicero J. General Thoracic Surgery. Shields TW, Locicero J, Reed CE, Feins RH. (eds). 7th Edition. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2009
  10. Onat S, Ates G, Avcı A, Yıldız T, Birak A, Akgul Ozmen C, et al. The role of mediastinoscopy in the diagnosis of non-lung cancer diseases. Ther Clin Risk Manag 2017; 13: 939-43
  11. Üçvet A, Gürsoy S, Yazgan S. Changes in the Surgical Treatment Strategies for Nonsmall Cell Lung Cancer in the Past 20 Years: A Single-Center Experience. Turk Thorac J 2020; 21: 8-13
  12. Korkmaz C, Demirbas S, Vatansev H. The value of endobronchial ultrasoundguided transbronchial needle aspiration, 18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography, and ultrasonography imaging techniques in the diagnosis of mediastinal and/or hilar malignant, anthracotic, and other benign lymph nodes. Medicine 2021; 100: e24728
  13. Haciibrahimoglu G, Cevik A, Bedirhan MA, Kutlu CA.