Dergiler / İstanbul Kuzey Klinikleri / 2016 / Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 1

Relationship between size of varices and platelet count/spleen size ratio in cirrhotic patients

Sayfa
46–52
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Prospective and randomized clinical researches are needed to clarify our findings.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:OBJECTIVE: This study investigated the relationship between size of gastroesophageal varices and platelet count/spleen diameter ratio in cirrhotic patients.METHODS: The present study included 186 cirrhotic patients in whom gastroesophageal varices were seen during upper gastrointestinal system endoscopy.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Varices were classified as small, medium, or large, and patients were separated into two groups for comparison: those with small varices and those with medium or large varices.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Prospective and randomized clinical researches are needed to clarify our findings.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study investigated the relationship between size of gastroesophageal varices and platelet count/spleen diameter ratio in cirrhotic patients.METHODS: The present study included 186 cirrhotic patients in whom gastroesophageal varices were seen during upper gastrointestinal system endoscopy. Clinical features, laboratory parameters, upper gastrointestinal system endoscopy, and abdominal ultrasonographic findings of patients were evaluated retrospectively. Platelet count/spleen diameter ratio (P/S) was calculated by dividing number of platelets in complete blood count (CBC) to largest diameter of spleen. Varices were classified as small, medium, or large, and patients were separated into two groups for comparison: those with small varices and those with medium or large varices. Of the total, 66.7 % of the patients were men (n=124) and 33.3% were women (n=62). Esophageal varices were found in 82.7% and gastric varices were found in 17.3%. RESULTS: Patients with large esophageal varices were found to have significantly lower P/S compared to patients with small esophageal varices (p=0.04). In receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, P/S and large varices correlated with 82% sensitivity and 79% positive predictive value. However, no statistically significant correlation between size of varices and P/S was found in patients with gastric varices (p=0.78).CONCLUSION: In patients with esophageal varices, P/S was found to be correlated with large varices with 82% sensitivity. However, this ratio did not predict large varices in patients with gastric varices. Prospective and randomized clinical researches are needed to clarify our findings.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

OZDİL, K., CALISKAN, Z., BULUR, A., OZTURK, O., DEMİRDAG, H., CALIK, E. S., AKBAS, E. S., KANAT, E., BİLGİC, N. M., KAHRAMAN, R. (2022). Relationship between size of varices and platelet count/spleen size ratio in cirrhotic patients. İstanbul Kuzey Klinikleri, Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 1, 46–52. https://ajindex.com/articles/551618

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (9)

  1. Miyaaki H, Ichikawa T, Taura N, Miuma S, Isomoto H, Nakao K. Endoscopic management of esophagogastric varices in Japan. Ann Transl Med 2014;2:42 Moodley J, Lopez R, Carey W. Compliance with practice guide- lines and risk of a first esophageal variceal hemorrhage in pa- tients with cirrhosis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2010;8:703-8.
  2. Garcia-Tsao G, Sanyal AJ, Grace ND, Carey W. Practice Guide- lines Committee of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases, Practice Parameters Committee of the Ameri- can College of Gastroenterology. Prevention and management of gastroesophageal varices and varicealhemorrhage in cirrhosis. Hepatology 2007;46:922-38.
  3. Qureshi W, Adler DG, Davila R, Egan J, Hirota W, Leighton J, et al. ASGE Guideline: the role of endoscopy in the management of variceal hemorrhage, updated July 2005. Gastrointest Endosc 2005;62:651-5. de Franchis R. Revising consensus in portal hypertension: report of the Baveno V consensus workshop on methodology of diagno- sis and therapy in portal hypertension. J Hepatol 2010;53:762-8.
  4. Sarin SK, Kumar A. Endoscopic Treatment of Gastric Varices. Clin Liver Dis. 2014;18:809-27. de Franchis R. Updating consensus in portal hypertension: Report of the Baveno III consensus workshop on definitions, methodology and therapeutic strategies in portal hypertension. J Hepatol 2000;33:846-52.
  5. Giannini EG, Zaman A, Kreil A, Floreani A, Dulbecco P, Testa E, et al. Platelet count/spleen diameter ratio for the noninvasive diagnosis of esophageal varices: results of a multicenter, prospec- tive, validation study. Am J Gastroenterol 2006;101:2511-9.
  6. Child CG, Turcotte JG. Surgery and portal hypertension. In: Child CG, editor. The liver and portal hypertension. Philadel- phia: Saunders; 1964. p. 50-64.
  7. Lamb PM, Lund A, Kanagasabay RR, Martin A, Webb JA, Reznek RH. Spleen size: how well do linear ultrasound mea- surements correlate with three-dimensional CT volume assess- ments? Br J Radiol 2002;75:573-7.
  8. Sarin SK, Lahoti D, Saxena SP, Murthy NS, Makwana UK. Prevalence, classification and natural history of gastric varices: a longterm follow-up study in 568 portal hypertension patients. Hepatology 1992;16:1343-49.
  9. Triantafyllou M, Stanley AJ. Update on gastric varices. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2014;6:168-75. de Franchis R; Baveno VI Faculty. Expanding consensus in por- tal hypertension: Report of the Baveno VI Consensus Work- shop: Stratifying risk and individualizing care for portal hyper- tension. J Hepatol 2015;63