KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / İstanbul Kuzey Klinikleri / 2017 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 1

Acute biliary pancreatitis in cholecystectomised patients

Turgut ANUK
Fatih CİFTCİ
Sayfa
73–76
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

If these are unsuccessful, the choledochus may be explored via open or laparoscopic surgery.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:OBJECTIVE: The present study is an evaluation of cases of acute biliary pancreatitis that developed subsequent to cholecystectomy.METHODS: Total of 44 patients were assessed in this retrospective study.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Demographic characteristics, severity of illness, time elapsed between cholecystectomy and development of pancreatitis, whether endoscopic sphincterotomy (ES) was performed, surgical procedure used, duration of hospitalization, and mortality data were recorded.RESULTS: Mean age of all patients was 60.14±16.4 years (range: 20-85 years), and female:male ratio was 28:16.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:If these are unsuccessful, the choledochus may be explored via open or laparoscopic surgery.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The present study is an evaluation of cases of acute biliary pancreatitis that developed subsequent to cholecystectomy.METHODS: Total of 44 patients were assessed in this retrospective study. Demographic characteristics, severity of illness, time elapsed between cholecystectomy and development of pancreatitis, whether endoscopic sphincterotomy (ES) was performed, surgical procedure used, duration of hospitalization, and mortality data were recorded.RESULTS: Mean age of all patients was 60.14±16.4 years (range: 20-85 years), and female:male ratio was 28:16. Mean length of time elapsed between cholecystectomy and development of acute pancreatitis was 80.6 months (range: 5-230 months). Gallstones and biliary sand were found in the choledochi of 36 patients upon endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), but not observed in the remaining 8 patients. ES was performed and material was extracted in 32 of the 36 patients, but stone extraction was unsuccessful in 4 cases; 3 patients underwent open surgery with choledochus exploration and 1 patient died. Excluding this patient, mean duration of hospitalization was 7.5±2.5 days.CONCLUSION: Stones in bile ducts may remain asymptomatic for long periods after cholecystectomy. However, some stones trigger acute pancreatitis months or years after cholecystectomy, causing risk of mortality. ERCP and ES are the standard treatments. If these are unsuccessful, the choledochus may be explored via open or laparoscopic surgery.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ANUK, T., CİFTCİ, F. (2022). Acute biliary pancreatitis in cholecystectomised patients. İstanbul Kuzey Klinikleri, Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 1, 73–76. https://ajindex.com/articles/551563

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (13)

  1. Bradley EL 3rd. A clinically based classification system for acute pancreatitis. Summary of the International Symposium on Acute Pancreatitis, Atlanta, Ga, September 11 through 13, 1992. Arch Surg 1993;128:586-90
  2. Gloor B, Stahel PF, Müller CA, Worni M, Büchler MW, Uhl W. Incidence and management of biliary pancreatitis in cholecystectomized patients. Results of a 7-year study. J Gastrointest Surg 2003;7:372-7
  3. Gül M, Aliosmanoğlu, Türkoğlu A, Uçmak F, Ülger BV, Oğuz A, et al. Kolesistektomili hastalarda akut biliyer pankreatit. 2012; 28:186-8 4. Alexakis N, Lombard M, Raraty M, Ghaneh P, Smart HL, Gilmore I, et al. When is pancreatitis considered to be of biliary origin and what are the implications for management? Pancreatology 2007;7:131-41
  4. Cox MR, Budge JP, Eslick GD. Timing and nature of presentation of unsuspected retained common bile duct stones after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a retrospective study. Surg Endosc 2015;29:2033-8
  5. Potter MW, Shah SA, McEnaney P, Chari RS, Callery MP. A critical appraisal of laparoscopic staging in hepatobiliary and pancreatic malignancy. Surg Oncol 2000;9:103-10
  6. Toouli J, Brooke-Smith M, Bassi C, Carr-Locke D, Telford J, Freeny P, et al. Guidelines for the management of acute pancreatitis. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2002;17 Suppl:S15-39
  7. Yanar F, Alış H. Akut pankreatitlerin prognozunun belirlenmesinde skorlama sistemlerinin rolü. Turkiye Klinikleri J Gen Surg-Special Topics 2011;4: 43-7
  8. Rogers AL, Farha GJ, Beamer RL, Chang FC. Incidence and associated mortality of retained common bile duct stones. Am J Surg 1985;150:690-3
  9. Braghetto I, Debandi A, Korn O, Bastias J. Long-term follow-up after laparoscopic cholecystectomy without routine intraoperative cholangiography. Surg Laparosc Endosc 1998;8:349-52
  10. Anwar S, Rahim R, Agwunobi A, Bancewicz J. The role of ERCP in management of retained bile duct stones after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. N Z Med J 2004;117:U1102
  11. Chiappetta Porras LT, Nápoli ED, Canullán CM, Quesada BM, Petracchi JE, Oría AS. Laparoscopic bile duct reexploration for retained duct stones. J Gastrointest Surg 2008;12:1518-20
  12. Leese T, Neoptolemos JP, Carr-Locke DL. Successes, failures, early complications and their management following endoscopic sphincterotomy: results in 394 consecutive patients from a single centre. Br J Surg 1985;72:215-9
  13. Williams EJ, Green J, Beckingham I, Parks R, Martin D, Lombard M; British Society of Gastroenterology. Guidelines