Dergiler / İstanbul Kuzey Klinikleri / 2020 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 3

Assessment of a new electrocardiographic criterion for the diagnosis of left ventricle hypertrophy: A prospective validation study

Sayfa
231–236
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Although the highest sensitivity belonged to the Peguero-Lo Presti criterion, in ROCanalysis, it showed modest predictive capability, which was similar to the established Cornell voltage criterion (AUC=0.64[0.56–0.68 95% CI], p

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:OBJECTIVE: Many criteria have been developed to predict left ventricular hypertrophy using an electrocardiogram (ECG).However, one major common limitation of all has been their low sensitivity.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The performance of each index was evaluated.RESULTS: Overall, 767 patients were enrolled in this study.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Although the highest sensitivity belonged to the Peguero-Lo Presti criterion, in ROCanalysis, it showed modest predictive capability, which was similar to the established Cornell voltage criterion (AUC=0.64[0.56–0.68 95% CI], p
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Many criteria have been developed to predict left ventricular hypertrophy using an electrocardiogram (ECG).However, one major common limitation of all has been their low sensitivity. Based on that, recently, a novel criterion has beenproposed, which is believed to have higher sensitivity without a compromise in specificity. Therefore, in our study, we aimedto test this novel ECG criterion prospectively in large, unselected cardiac patients.METHODS: Patients who were referred to our echocardiography laboratory due to various etiologies were prospectivelyenrolled. The novel Peguero-Lo Presti criterion was assessed along with other established ECG criteria. The left ventricularmass index was calculated using echocardiography. The performance of each index was evaluated.RESULTS: Overall, 767 patients were enrolled in this study. The sensitivity and specificity of the Peguero-Lo Presti criterionwere 17.5% and 94.5%, respectively. Although the highest sensitivity belonged to the Peguero-Lo Presti criterion, in ROCanalysis, it showed modest predictive capability, which was similar to the established Cornell voltage criterion (AUC=0.64[0.56–0.68 95% CI], p

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

KILIÇKESMEZ, K., ÇETİNKAL, G., SIĞIRCI, S., SER, Ö. S., YILDIZ, S. S., KESKİN, K., DOĞAN, G. M. (2022). Assessment of a new electrocardiographic criterion for the diagnosis of left ventricle hypertrophy: A prospective validation study. İstanbul Kuzey Klinikleri, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 3, 231–236. https://ajindex.com/articles/551396

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (15)

  1. Bluemke DA, Kronmal RA, Lima JA, Liu K, Olson J, Burke GL, et al. The relationship of left ventricular mass and geometry to incident cardiovascular events: the MESA (Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis) study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008
  2. 2148–55. 2. Mahn JJ, Dubey E, Brody A, Welch R, Zalenski R, Flack JM, et al. Test characteristics of electrocardiography for detection of left ventricular hypertrophy in asymptomatic emergency department patients with hypertension. Acad Emerg Med 2014
  3. 996–1002. 3. Hancock EW, Deal BJ, Mirvis DM, Okin P, Kligfield P, Gettes LS, et al
  4. American Heart Association Electrocardiography and Arrhythmias Committee, Council on Clinical Cardiology
  5. American College of Cardiology Foundation
  6. Heart Rhythm Society. AHA/ACCF/HRS recommendations for the standardization and interpretation of the electrocardiogram: part V: electrocardiogram changes associated with cardiac chamber hypertrophy: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Electrocardiography and Arrhythmias Committee, Council on Clinical Cardiology
  7. the American College of Cardiology Foundation
  8. and the Heart Rhythm Society. Endorsed by the International Society for Computerized Electrocardiology. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009
  9. 992–1002. 4. Peguero JG, Lo Presti S, Perez J, Issa O, Brenes JC, Tolentino A. Electrocardiographic Criteria for the Diagnosis of Left Ventricular Hypertrophy. J Am Coll Cardiol 2017
  10. 1694–703. 5. Lang RM, Bierig M, Devereux RB, Flachskampf FA, Foster E, Pellikka PA, et al
  11. Chamber Quantification Writing Group
  12. American Society of Echocardiography’s Guidelines and Standards Committee
  13. European Association of Echocardiography. Recommendations for chamber quantification: a report from the American Society of Echocardiography’s Guidelines and Standards Committee and the Chamber Quantification Writing Group, developed in conjunction with the European Association of Echocardiography, a branch of the European Society of Cardiology. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2005
  14. 1440–63. 6. Lang RM, Badano LP, Mor-Avi V, Afilalo J, Armstrong A, Ernande L, et al. Recommendations for cardiac chamber quantification by echocardiography in adults: an update from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2015
  15. 233–70. 7. Bacharova L, Ugander M. Left ventricular hypertrophy: The relationship between the electrocardiogram and cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging. Ann Noninvasi