Dergiler / İstanbul Kuzey Klinikleri / 2021 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 3

A meta-analysis of antibiotic resistance rates in Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolated in blood cultures in Turkey between 2007 and 2017

Sayfa
286–297
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Other antibiotics with antipseudomonal effect should be prioritized in the treatment of these infections.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:OBJECTIVE: The prevalence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa has remained stable in recent years, and resistant strains has increased dramatically.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:In this meta-analysis, we aimed to analyze the P. aeruginosa strains isolated from blood cultures in Turkey during the last 11 years and to reveal their antimicrobial susceptibility.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Other antibiotics with antipseudomonal effect should be prioritized in the treatment of these infections.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2007 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The prevalence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa has remained stable in recent years, and resistant strains has increased dramatically. In this meta-analysis, we aimed to analyze the P. aeruginosa strains isolated from blood cultures in Turkey during the last 11 years and to reveal their antimicrobial susceptibility. METHODS: Data collected between 2007 and 2017 were divided into two groups as Group-1; 2007–2011 and Group-2; 2012–2017. The differences in antibiotic resistance rates between Group-1 and Group-2 were analyzed. The study data were included according to PRISMA criteria, then meta-analysis was performed. RESULTS: A total of 30 study data from 25 studies were included in the study. The prevalence rate of meropenem (MEM) resistance in P. aeruginosa in Turkey was 25.1% (95% Cl: 20.65–29.83) according to a meta-analysis of 637 isolates. MEM resistance rates in Group-1 and Group-2 were 23.4% (95% Cl: 18.34–28.99) and 29.3% (95% Cl: 21.23–38.23), respectively. The prevalence rate of imipenem (IMP) resistance in P. aeruginosa in Turkey was 26.8% (%95Cl: 23.40–30.35) according to a meta-analysis of 1421 isolates. IMP resistance rates in Group-1 and Group-2 were 26.2% (95%Cl: 22.41–30.27) and 28.4% (95%Cl: 21.57–35.88), respectively. Ciprofloxacin (CIP) resistance rate was 27.04% (95% Cl: 21.88–32.52) in 1388 isolates. CIP resistance rates in Group-1 and Group-2 were 30.8% (95% Cl: 24.35–37.56) and 18.6% (95% Cl: 10.72–28.11), respectively. The prevalence rate of piperacillin-tazobactam (TZP) resistance in P. aeruginosa in Turkey was 29.2% (95% Cl: 21.058–38.088) according to a meta-analysis of 1030 isolates. TZP resistance rates in Group-1 and Group-2 were 26.1% (95% Cl: 17.76–35.31) and 38.2% (95% Cl: 18.48–60.27), respectively. CONCLUSION: There is a remarkable increase in resistance rates in P. aeruginosa to MEM and TZP in Turkey due to frequent use. Other antibiotics with antipseudomonal effect should be prioritized in the treatment of these infections.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Kose, S., Cetinkaya, R. A., Yenilmez, E., Isik, S. A., Gorenek, L. (2022). A meta-analysis of antibiotic resistance rates in Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolated in blood cultures in Turkey between 2007 and 2017. İstanbul Kuzey Klinikleri, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 3, 286–297. https://ajindex.com/articles/551327

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (13)

  1. Azam MW, Khan AU. Updates on the pathogenicity status of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Drug Discov Today 2019;24:350–9
  2. Zhang Y, Chen XL, Huang AW, Liu SL, Liu WJ, Zhang N, et al. Mortality attributable to carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa bacteremia: a meta-analysis of cohort studies. Emerg Microbes Infect 2016;5:e27
  3. Sedighi M, Salehi-Abargouei A, Oryan G, Faghri J. Epidemiology of VIM-1-imipenem resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa in Iran: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Res Med Sci 2014;19:899–903
  4. Nathwani D, Raman G, Sulham K, Gavaghan M, Menon V. Clinical and economic consequences of hospital-acquired resistant and multidrug- resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control 2014;3:32
  5. Clinical Laboratory Standard Institute. Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. 28th ed. Available at: https://clsi.org/ media/1930/m100ed28_sample.pdf. Accessed Mar 10, 2021
  6. Şirin MC, Ağuş N, Yılmaz N, Bayram A, Yılmaz Hancı S, Şamlıoğlu P, et al. Microorganisms isolated from blood cultures of the patients in intensive care units and their antibiotic susceptibilities. Turk Hij Den Biyol Derg 2017;74:269–78
  7. Mehli M, Gayyurhan ED, Zer Y, Akgün S, Özgür Akın FE, Balcı İ. Microorganism isolated in blood cultures in the Gaziantep University Hospital and their susceptibility to antibiotics. İnfeksiyon Derg 2007;21:141–5
  8. Çolakoğlu Ş, Alışkan HE, Göçmen JS. The Antibiotic Susceptibility Profile of Acinetobacter baumannii and Pseudomonas aeruginosa Strains Isolated from the Blood Cultures (2012-2014). Türk Mikrobiyol Cem Derg 2014;44:132–8
  9. Şay Coşkun US. Distribution of Microorganisms in Blood Cultures and Their Antibiotic Resistance. ANKEM Derg 2018;32:45–52
  10. Çelik C, Gözel MG, Uysal EB, Bakıcı MZ, Gültürk E. Antimicrobial resistance patterns of pseudomonas aeruginosa strains isolated from bloodstream infections: six-year evaluation. Klimik Derg 2013;26:108–12
  11. Duman Y, Kuzucu Ç, Çuğlan SS. Bacteria ısolated from blood cultures and their antimicrobial susceptibility. Erciyes Med J 2011;33:189–96
  12. Er H, Aşık G, Yoldaş Ö, Demir C, Keşli R. Determination of the microorganisms ısolated from blood cultures and their antibiotic susceptibility rates. Türk Mikrobiyol Cem Derg 2015;45:48–54
  13. Güney M, Bedir O, Kılıç A, Başustaoğlu AC. The antibiotic resistance patterns of Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains isolated from blood cultures specimen