KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / İnönü Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 3

A different approach to teaching French as a foreign language at preparatory school: From curriculum development to practice

Ayşe Işık AKDAĞ
Sayfa
231–239
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The designed curriculum may be used in different institutions if altered in line with learners’ needs.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:This study aims to evaluate the effects resulted from the implementation of a new curriculum for the teaching of French as a foreign language (FLE) at undergraduate level.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The sample consisted of 30 prep class students at a state university.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The designed curriculum may be used in different institutions if altered in line with learners’ needs.
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:language learning curriculum development · teaching of French as a foreign language · CEFR

Özet

This study aims to evaluate the effects resulted from the implementation of a new curriculum for the teaching of French as a foreign language (FLE) at undergraduate level. Since majority of students found foreign language coursebooks (FLCs) not motivating, a curriculum that aims to develop language competences by excluding FLCs was designed. The theoretical framework of this curriculum is based on CEFR, on the Bologna Process and on the National Qualifications Framework for Higher Education. The research was designed as an action research in education. The sample consisted of 30 prep class students at a state university. The data collected from the students through a questionnaire were analysed by SPSS Statistics 21. The results of the study indicate that students found this new curriculum very successful. Except one course, satisfaction levels of 100%, 92% , 82.6 , %65,4 and 54,2 were achieved for Book Reading, Verbal Communication, Grammar, Dictation and Written Communication. The designed curriculum may be used in different institutions if altered in line with learners’ needs.

Abstract

This study aims to evaluate the effects resulted from the implementation of a new curriculum for the teaching of French as a foreign language (FLE) at undergraduate level. Since majority of students found foreign language coursebooks (FLCs) not motivating, a curriculum that aims to develop language competences by excluding FLCs was designed. The theoretical framework of this curriculum is based on CEFR, on the Bologna Process and on the National Qualifications Framework for Higher Education. The research was designed as an action research in education. The sample consisted of 30 prep class students at a state university. The data collected from the students through a questionnaire were analysed by SPSS Statistics 21. The results of the study indicate that students found this new curriculum very successful. Except one course, satisfaction levels of 100%, 92% , 82.6 , %65,4 and 54,2 were achieved for Book Reading, Verbal Communication, Grammar, Dictation and Written Communication. The designed curriculum may be used in different institutions if altered in line with learners’ needs.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

AKDAĞ, A. I. (2022). A different approach to teaching French as a foreign language at preparatory school: From curriculum development to practice. İnönü Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 3, 231–239. https://ajindex.com/articles/547387

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (10)

  1. Aksoy, N. (2003). Eylem Araştırması: eğitimsel uygulamaları iyileştirme ve değiştirmede kullanılacak bir yöntem [Action research: a method to be used for the improvement and change in educational applications]. Educational Administration: Theory and Practice 9, no.4: 474-489. Retrieved from http://www.kuey.net/index.php/kuey/index.
  2. Auerbach, E.R. (1986). Competency-based ESL: one step forward or two steps back?. TESOL Quarterly 20, no.3: 411-429.
  3. Ajayi, L. (2005). Teachers’ needs and predesigned instructional practices: An analysis of a reading/language arts coursebook for a second grade class. Reading Improvement 42, no.4: 200-211.
  4. Apple, M. W., & Jungck, S. (1990). “You Don’t Have to Be a Teacher to Teach This Unit:” Teaching, Technology, and Gender in the Classroom. American Educational Research Journal, 27(2), 227-251.
  5. Austin, J.L. (1975). How to do things with words. Second Edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  6. Barrow, R. (1984). Giving Teaching Back to the Teachers. A Critical Introduction to Curriculum Theory. Brighton: Wheatsheaf Books. Beyhan, A. (2013). Eğitim örgütlerinde eylem araştırması [Action research in educational organizations]. Journal of Computer and Education Research 2:65-89. Retrieved from http://www.joucer.com. Billières, M. (2015). Actes de language et enseignement du FLE [Speech acts and teaching French as a foreign language] [Web log post]. Retrieved from http://www.verbotonale-phonetique.com/actes-de-langage-enseignement-fle
  7. CE-Council of Europe. (2001). Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Strasbourg: Press Syndicate of the University of Cambridge. Courtillon, J. (2006). Les conditions d’application de l’Approche communicative [Application conditions of Communicative Approach]. Revue japonaise de didactique du français 1, no.1: 12-32. Retrieved from http://www.sjdf.org
  8. Crawford, J. (2002). The Role of materials in the language classroom: Finding the balance. In Methodology in language teaching: An anthology of current practice, ed. J. C. Richards and W. A. Renandya, 80-93. USA: Cambridge University Press.
  9. Edge, J., & Wharton, S. (1998). 13. Autonomy and development: living in the materials world. Materials development in language teaching.Elliot, J. (1991). Action research for Educational Change. Philadelphia: Open University Press.
  10. Erdoğan, A. (Eds). (2010). Yükseköğretimde yeniden yapılanma: 66 soruda Bologna süreci uygulamaları [Restructuring in higher education: Bologna