KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / İnönü Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 3

Eğitim Araştırmalarında Kuramın Ölümü

Mukaddes Erdem
David Geelan
Tuğba Öztürk
Sayfa
1153–1164
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Kaynak:David Geelan; Proceedings of the 2003 Complexity Science and Educational Research ConferenceOctober 16–18 • Edmonton, Canada • pp. 169–18

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Bu çalışma, David Geelan'ın Alberta Üniversitesi'ndeyken, 2003 yılında Complexity Science and Educational Research Conference'nda sunduğu bildirinin tam metninin Türkçe çevirisidir.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Bu çalışma, David Geelan'ın Alberta Üniversitesi'ndeyken, 2003 yılında Complexity Science and Educational Research Conference'nda sunduğu bildirinin tam metninin Türkçe çevirisidir.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Kaynak:David Geelan; Proceedings of the 2003 Complexity Science and Educational Research ConferenceOctober 16–18 • Edmonton, Canada • pp. 169–18
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2003 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Eğitim Araştırmaları · Kuram

Özet

Bu çalışma, David Geelan'ın Alberta Üniversitesi'ndeyken, 2003 yılında Complexity Science and Educational Research Conference'nda sunduğu bildirinin tam metninin Türkçe çevirisidir. Kaynak:David Geelan; Proceedings of the 2003 Complexity Science and Educational Research ConferenceOctober 16–18 • Edmonton, Canada • pp. 169–18

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Erdem, M., Geelan, D., Öztürk, T. (2022). Eğitim Araştırmalarında Kuramın Ölümü. İnönü Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 3, 1153–1164. https://ajindex.com/articles/547282

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (12)

  1. Biggiero, L. (2001). Sources of complexity in human systems. Nonlinear Dynamics, Psychology, and Life Sciences 5(1): 3–19.
  2. Blacker, D. (1996). Philosophy of technology and education: An invitation to inquiry. Philosophy of Education Society Yearbook. http://www.ed.uiuc.edu/EPS/PES-yearbook/94_docs/BLACKER.HTM
  3. Chalmers, A.F. (1982). What is this Thing Called Science? (2nd ed.). St Lucia, Qld: University of Queensland Press.
  4. Constant, E.W. (1973). A model for technological change. Technology and Culture, (14), 554. Denzin, N.K. & Lincoln, Y.S. (1994). Handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Denzin, N.K. & Lincoln, Y.S. (2000). Handbook of qualitative research. (2nd Ed.) Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Durbin, P.T. (1998). Advances in philosophy of technology? Comparative perspectives Techné: Journal of the Society for Philosophy and Technology, 4(1), 4-15.
  5. Eisner, E.W. (1998). The enlightened eye: Qualitative inquiry and the enhancement of educational practice. Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Merrill. Fals Borda, O. (1979). Investigating reality in order to transfom it: The Colombian experience. In Stephen Kemmis & Robin McTaggart, eds., The Action Research Reader. Deakin University, Geelong. Feenberg, A. (2000). From essentialism to constructivism: Philosophy of technology at the crossroads. In E. Higgs, D.Strong, and A. Light, (Eds.), Technology and the Good Life. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. [Online: http://www-rohan.sdsu.edu/faculty/feenberg/talk4.html]
  6. Feyerabend, P.K. (1987).
  7. Farewell to Reason. Verso, London. Gage, N.L. (1989) The paradigm wars and their aftermath: a “historical” sketch of research on teaching since 1989. Educational Researcher 18(7): 4–10.
  8. Geelan, D.R. (2001a). The empty centre: Power/knowledge, relationships and the myth of ‘student centred teaching’ in teacher education. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 26(2): 27–37.
  9. Geelan, D.R. (2001b). Feyerabend revisited: Epistemological anarchy and disciplined eclecticism in educational research. Australian Educational Researcher, 28(1): 129–146.
  10. Geelan, D.R. (2000). Sketching some postmodern alternatives: Beyond paradigms and research programs as referents for science education. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 5(1). https://wolfweb.unr.edu/homepage/crowther/ejse/geelan.html
  11. Gutting, G. (1980). Paradigms and Revolutions: Appraisals and Applications of Thomas Kuhn’s Philosophy of Science, Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.
  12. Habermas, J. (1971). Knowledg