Dergiler / Istanbul University Journal of Electrical and Electronics Engineering / 2007 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 2

Error data analyzing of the integration of the sensors with different measuring boundaries in dynamic environments

Sayfa
439–442
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The logic equations are used in Chauvenet’s criterion in this model to determineif the data is over range or not.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Data accuracy is important to determine a target.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The noise factor affects getting accurate data negatively.These factors depend on sensor types.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The logic equations are used in Chauvenet’s criterion in this model to determineif the data is over range or not.
🔬Tür:Modelleme & Sayısal Simülasyon
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Data accuracy is important to determine a target. Mobile robots are used in dynamic environments.At dynamic environments, the noise factor and situation of objects are changeable. A sensor may notwork properly in dynamic environmenst. The noise factor affects getting accurate data negatively.These factors depend on sensor types. Therefore, one of the goals of sensor integration i, to quenchone or more sensor disadvantages by using other sensor or sensors, get more accurate and reliabledata, reduce noise factor, determine and analyze more options of target or targets.Every sensor has a measurement range and this range changes according to the sensor types. Thesensor has two boundaries; lower boundary and upper boundary. It is usually zero below the lowerboundary. Above the upper boundary it keeps the maximum output value and Is usually stable.Essentially, the sensor data over the range called error data. If the value to be measured in anintegration composed of the sensors is out of ranges of some sensors, the data of these sensors is to beeliminated. Eliminated data are bad data. Error data analyzing methods are used to determine baddata. Chauvenet’s criterion is one of these methods. A new model eliminating the sensor data isdeveloped. The logic equations are used in Chauvenet’s criterion in this model to determine the datais over range or not. The logic equations are used in Chauvenet’s criterion in this model to determineif the data is over range or not.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

KURT, S. (2022). Error data analyzing of the integration of the sensors with different measuring boundaries in dynamic environments. Istanbul University Journal of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 2, 439–442. https://ajindex.com/articles/543794

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (1)

  1. Katti Facelli, Andre C.P.L.f. de Carvalho, Solange O. Rezende, “Combining Intelligent Techniques For Sensor Fusion”, Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Neural Information Processing (ICONIP’02), Vol.4 [2] Zou Yi, Ho Yeong Khing, Chua Chin Seng, Zhou Xiao Wei, “Multi-Ultrasonic Sensor Fusion for Mobile Robots”, Proceedings of the IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium 2000 Dearborn (MI), USA, October3-5, 2000 [3] Phabhakar S. Naidu, Sensor Array Signal Processing, Florida: CRC Press, 2001 [4] Siegfried Martens, Paolo Gaudiano and Ga,il A. Carpenter, “Mobile Robot sensor integration with fuzzy ARTMAP”, Proceedings of the 1998 IEEE ISIC/CIRA/ISA3 Joint Conference Galthersburg, MD, September 14-17, 1998 [5] Jun Miura, Yoshiro Negishi, and Yoshiaki Shirai, “Mobile Robot Map Generation by Integrating Omnidirectional Stereo and Laser Range Finder”, Proceedings of the 2002 IEEE/RSJ Inti. Conference on Intelligent Robos and Systems EPFL, Lusanne, Switzerland, October 2002 [6] Hugh W. Coleman and W. Glenn Steele, Experimentation and Uncertainty Analysis for Engineers, Second Edition, ISBN 0- 471-12146-0, Copyright 1999 by John Wiley & Sons, Wiley-IEEE, New York [7] Benjamin Peirce, “Criterion for the rejection of doubtful observations”, Astronomical Journal, vol. 2, iss. 45, p. 161-163, 1852 [8] Stephen M. Ross, “Peirce’s Criterion for the Elimination of Suspect Experimental Data”, Journal of Engineering Technology, Fall 2003