KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Istanbul University Journal of Electrical and Electronics Engineering / 2009 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 2

Design of CDM-based controller for integrating pumped tank process, its comparative setpoint tracking performance, and disturbance rejection capability

Erkan İMAL
Sayfa
1003–1013
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

It is concluded that if no overshoot together with a shorter settling time is required, the CDM-controlled system has advantageous performance, although the PI-controlled system yields about 61% faster response as a percentage of the CDM-controlled system.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Integrating processes are non-self regulating and very difficult to control.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Eventually, the performances of the PI and CDM controllers are compared.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:It is concluded that if no overshoot together with a shorter settling time is required, the CDM-controlled system has advantageous performance, although the PI-controlled system yields about 61% faster response as a percentage of the CDM-controlled system.
🔬Tür:Modelleme & Sayısal Simülasyon
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Integrating processes are non-self regulating and very difficult to control. The pumped tank process is an example of such processes. In this paper, first of all, first order plus dead time (FOPDT) integrating model of the pumped tank process is obtained by a software called Loop-Pro Trainer. Next, the PI tuning values are computed using the internal model control (IMC) tuning correlations based on truncated (first-order) Taylor series approximation. Subsequently, a controller is designed using the coefficient diagram method (CDM). Eventually, the performances of the PI and CDM controllers are compared. It is concluded that if no overshoot together with a shorter settling time is required, the CDM-controlled system has advantageous performance, although the PI-controlled system yields about 61% faster response as a percentage of the CDM-controlled system.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

İMAL, E. (2022). Design of CDM-based controller for integrating pumped tank process, its comparative setpoint tracking performance, and disturbance rejection capability. Istanbul University Journal of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 2, 1003–1013. https://ajindex.com/articles/543740

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (15)

  1. Cano, R.A.R., & Odloak, D. (2003). Robust model predictive control of integrating processes. Journal of Process Control,13. Elsevier Science Ltd. pp. 101–114
  2. Carrapiço, O.L., & Odloak, D., (2005), A stable model predictive control for integrating processes. Computers and Chemical Engineering 29, Elsevier Ltd., pp. 1089– 1099
  3. Chien, I-L., Peng, S. C., & and Liu, & J. H. (2002). Simple control method for integrating processes with long deadtime. Journal of Process Control, 12 (3), 391-404
  4. Svečko, R., Domlagič, D., Čuček, Debevc, & M., Tominc-Bele, L. (1991). Predictive control of integrating processes on non parametric model. CH2964-5/91/0000- 0840$01.00 © IEEE
  5. Astrom, K., & Hagglund, T. (1995). PID controllers: theory, design and tuning. USA: Instrument Society of America
  6. Skogestad, S. (2003). Simple analytic rules for model reduction and PID controller tuning. Journal of Process Control, 13(4), 291-309
  7. Kaya, İ., (2003). A PI-PD controller design for control of unstable and integrating processes. ISA Transactions 42. The Instrumentation, Systems, and Automation Society. 111-121
  8. Rice, B., & Cooper, D. (2007). A design and tuning recipe for integrating processes. Website of Control Station situated at
  9. Manabe, S. (1998). Coefficient Diagram Method. 14th IFAC Symposium on Control in Aerospace, Seoul, Korea, 199-210
  10. Cooper, D. J., (2004). User Guide Control Station 3.7 for Windows, USA: Control Station, Inc
  11. Cooper, D. J., (2004). Hands-on Workshop Series: A Companion to Practical Process Control Using LOOP-PRO 4.x. 73-76. USA: Control Station, Inc
  12. Cooper, D. J., (2005). Practical Process Control. USA: Control Station, Inc
  13. Dougherty, D., & Cooper, D. (2003). A practical multiple model adaptive strategy for single-loop MPC. Control Engineering Practice, 11(4), 141-159
  14. Seborg, D.E., Edgar, T.F., & Mellichamp, (2004). Process Dynamics and Control, 2/e, John Wiley & Sons, Inc
  15. Chien, I-L & Fruehauf, P.S., (1990). Consider IMC Tuning to Improve Controller Performance, Chem. Eng. Progress, 86(10), pp. 33-41.