Dergiler / Istanbul University Journal of Electrical and Electronics Engineering / 2017 / Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 2

On The Classification of Hand Movements with Electromyogram Signals Obtained From Arm Muscles for Controlling Hand Prosthesis

Sayfa
3425–3432
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Interestingly, the left-hand versus right-hand and the righthand versus left-hand classification success was obtained 65.7%.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The aim of the study is to generate control signals from surface Electromyography signals (EMGs) measured from four hand muscles; Extensor carpi radialis, Palmaris longus, Pronator quadratus and Flexor digitorum superficialis to navigate a prosthetic hand.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The features have been computed from the windowed EMG of a 0.512 second interval.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Interestingly, the left-hand versus right-hand and the righthand versus left-hand classification success was obtained 65.7%.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

The aim of the study is to generate control signals from surface Electromyography signals (EMGs) measured from four hand muscles; Extensor carpi radialis, Palmaris longus, Pronator quadratus and Flexor digitorum superficialis to navigate a prosthetic hand. The EMGs for five hand movements; finger flexion, wrist flexion, wrist extension, pronation, supination have been acquired. The right hand and left hand data recorded from two males and two females. The features have been computed from the windowed EMG of a 0.512 second interval. From each muscle, root mean square value, mean frequency and peak frequency are employed as features. These features and their pairwise combinations have been classified with support vector machine. The classifications have been done for two scenarios: 1. For each subject the right (left) hand movement is classified from the right (left) arm EMG data. 2. The left (right) hand movement of a subject is classified from the right (left) arm EMG data of the same subject. The average right-hand success of the classification was 82.0%, while the left-hand categorization was 83.5%. Interestingly, the left-hand versus right-hand and the righthand versus left-hand classification success was obtained 65.7%.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ÖZGÜNEN, K. T., ARICA, S., ARA, R. K. (2022). On The Classification of Hand Movements with Electromyogram Signals Obtained From Arm Muscles for Controlling Hand Prosthesis. Istanbul University Journal of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 2, 3425–3432. https://ajindex.com/articles/543589

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (14)

  1. Y. H. Liu, H. P. Huang and C. H. Weng,"Recognition of Electromyographic Signals Using Cascaded Kernel Learning Machine ", IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 253-264. June, 2007
  2. K. Momen, S. Krishnan and T. Chau, "Real-Time Classification of Forearm Electromyographic Signals Corresponding to User-Selected Intentional Movements for Multifunction Prosthesis Control ", IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 535-542. December, 2007
  3. R. S. Rekhi, A. S. Arora, S. Singh and D. Singh, "MultiClass SVM Classification of Surface EMG Signal for Upper Limb Function ", in ICBBE, Beijing, China, 2009, pp. 1-4
  4. M. R. Ahsan, M. I. Ibrahimy and O. O. Khalifa, "Hand motion detection from EMG signals by using ANN based classifier for Human Computer Interaction", in ICMSAO, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 2011, pp. 1-6
  5. U. Baspinar, H. S Varol and K. Yildiz, "Classification of hand movements by using artificial neural network", in INISTA, Trabzon, Turkey, 2012, pp. 1-4
  6. Y. Al-Assaf, "Surface myoelectric signal analysis: Dynamic approaches for change detection and classification", IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, vol. 53, no. 11, pp. 2248-2256. October, 2006
  7. M. Zardoshti-Kermani, B. C. Wheeler, K. Badie and R. M. Hashemi, " EMG feature evaluation for movement control of upper extremity prostheses", IEEE Transactions on Rehabilitation Engineering, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 324-333. August, 2002
  8. S. Haykin, " Neural Networks: A Comprehensive Foundation. 2nd ed.", Prentice Hall, NJ, USA, 1999
  9. B. A. Shenoi, " Introduction to Digital Signal Processing and Filter Design", Wiley, New York, USA, 2005
  10. S. Haykin, "Communication systems", Wiley, Singapore, 1995
  11. R. N. Ganesh. (2012, October 17). Computational Intelligence in Electromyography Analysis - A Perspective on Current Applications and Future Challenges [InTechOpen]. Available:
  12. C. J. Burges," A Tutorial on Support Vector Machines for Pattern Recognition", Springer Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 121-167. June, 1998
  13. Ö. F. Ertuğrul, M. E Tağluk, Y. Kaya and R. Tekin, "EMG Signal Classification by Extreme Learning Machine", in SIU, Girne, Cyprus, 2013, pp. 9-12
  14. E. Alpaydin, "Introduction to machine learning ", The MIT Press, London