KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / IOJET / 2018 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 4

THE ROLE OF BRAIN DOMINANCE IN THE PEDAGOGICAL STRATEGIES USED BY IRANIAN ELT TEACHERS

Samad MİRZA SUZANİ
Dergi
IOJET
Sayfa
705–722
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Based on the results, it can be claimed that teachers can employ any strategy type they find more useful in their language classes regardless of their brain dominance, as a cognitive style.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:This study aimed to investigate the role of Iranian ELT teachers’ brain dominance in the pedagogical strategies they employ and reveal in which ways brain dominance as a cognitive factor can influence the way teachers perform in their language classrooms.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:To this end, data were gathered from 74 ELT teachers in higher education institutes in Shiraz, Iran, who were selected to partake in the study through availability sampling.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Based on the results, it can be claimed that teachers can employ any strategy type they find more useful in their language classes regardless of their brain dominance, as a cognitive style.
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate the role of Iranian ELT teachers’ brain dominance in the pedagogical strategies they employ and reveal in which ways brain dominance as a cognitive factor can influence the way teachers perform in their language classrooms. To this end, data were gathered from 74 ELT teachers in higher education institutes in Shiraz, Iran, who were selected to partake in the study through availability sampling. The participants were asked to fill in two questionnaires, the first one determined their brain dominance, and the second one examined the pedagogical strategies they used in their teaching settings. Analysis of data gathered via descriptive as well as inferential statistics revealed that teachers’ brain dominance did not have any effects on their use of teaching strategies. Based on the results, it can be claimed that teachers can employ any strategy type they find more useful in their language classes regardless of their brain dominance, as a cognitive style.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

SUZANİ, S. M. (2022). THE ROLE OF BRAIN DOMINANCE IN THE PEDAGOGICAL STRATEGIES USED BY IRANIAN ELT TEACHERS. IOJET, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 4, 705–722. https://ajindex.com/articles/542400

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (11)

  1. Alptekin, C., & Atakan, S. (1990). Field dependence-independence and hemisphericity as variables in L2 achievement. Second Language Research, 6 (2), 135-149.
  2. Bakhshi, H., Rashvandi, M., and Alirezaeian, V. (2014). The effects of brain dominance on writing tasks of Iranian EFL learners. International Journal of Applied Linguistics World, 6(4), 240-251.
  3. Bavand Savadkouhi, Z., Hassani, M. T. & Rahmani, R. (2013). The effect of hemispheric dominance on learning vocabulary1 strategies among Iranian EFL learners. European Online Journal of Natural and Social Sciences, 2 (2), 60, Special Issue on Teaching and Learning. Beck, C. R. (2001). Matching teaching strategies to learning style preferences. The Teacher Educator, 37 (1), 1-15.
  4. Breien-Pierson, R. (1988). The influence of brain hemisphericity on the composing process of twelfth grades (Doctoral Dissertation, Old Dominion University, 1988). Dissertation Abstracts International, 49, 19. Brown (2002). Principles of language learning and teaching (4th Ed.). New York: Pearson Education Inc. Brown, H. D. (2007). Principles of language learning and teaching (5th Ed.). New York: Pearson Education Inc. Cesur, M. O., & Fer, S. (2011). A model explaining relationship between language learning strategies, learning styles and success in reading comprehension. Journal of Education, 41, 83-93.
  5. Davis, M. H. (1994). Empathy: A social psychological approach. Brown & Benchmark: Dubuque, IA. Dreyer, C., & Oxford, R. L. (1996). Learning strategies and other predictors of ESL proficiency among Afrikaans speakers in South Africa. Language Learning Strategies Around The World: Cross-Cultural Perspectives, 61-74.
  6. Dulger, O. (2012). Brain dominance and language learning strategy usage of Turkish EFL learners. Cognitive Philology, 5, 1-23.
  7. Dunn, R. (1984). Theory into practice: Matching teaching and learning styles. Modern English Learning, 23(1), 10-19.
  8. Ellis, R. (1994). The study of second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  9. Gibson, K. M. (2002). Learning styles and hemispheric dominance- right or left brain: Which is dominant in your family? Home, education learning magazine. Retrieved May, 22, 2016, from http://www.leapingfromthebox.com/art/kmg/learningstyles2
  10. Gurney, P. (2007). Five factors for effective teaching. New Zealand Journal of Teachers’ Work, 4(2), 89-98.
  11. Hergenhahn, B. R., & Olson, M. H. (2005). An introduction to theories of learning. London: Pearson Education Limited. Jie, L., & Xiaoquing, Q. (2006)