KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / IOJET / 2018 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 3

NEW TECHNOLOGIES IN MICRO TEACHINGS: IS IT POSSIBLE FOR WEB 2.0 TOOLS TO AFFECT PROSPECTIVE TEACHERS’ WEB PEDAGOGICAL CONTENT KNOWLEDGE AND TEACHER SELFEFFICACY?

Halit KARALAR
Bilge ASLAN ALTAN
Dergi
IOJET
Sayfa
535–551
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

They added that they were eagerto apply Web 2.0 tools in their future classrooms.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of Web 2.0 tools applied inmicroteachings on prospective teachers’ web pedagogical content knowledge and teacherself-efficacy, and to examine their views on the procedure.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:This research used mixed researchdesign and was conducted with 24 prospective teachers who participated in teacher trainingcertificate program in Faculty of Education in a state university in Turkey.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:They added that they were eagerto apply Web 2.0 tools in their future classrooms.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of Web 2.0 tools applied inmicroteachings on prospective teachers’ web pedagogical content knowledge and teacherself-efficacy, and to examine their views on the procedure. This research used mixed researchdesign and was conducted with 24 prospective teachers who participated in teacher trainingcertificate program in Faculty of Education in a state university in Turkey. Web pedagogicalcontent knowledge scale, teacher self-efficacy scale, and an open-ended question form wereused as data collection tools. Paired samples t-test and Pearson correlation analysis wereapplied for the analysis of quantitative data; content analysis was used to analyze thequalitative data. The findings showed that there was a significant difference on prospectiveteachers’ web pedagogical content knowledge and teacher self-efficacy levels after Web 2.0tools implementation. The research also concluded that there was a medium level positiverelation between teacher candidates’ web pedagogical content knowledge and teacher selfefficacy.They stated that it was easy to use these tools, learning was fun, easy, andpermanent, and they actively involved in instructional time. They added that they were eagerto apply Web 2.0 tools in their future classrooms.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

KARALAR, H., ALTAN, B. A. (2022). NEW TECHNOLOGIES IN MICRO TEACHINGS: IS IT POSSIBLE FOR WEB 2.0 TOOLS TO AFFECT PROSPECTIVE TEACHERS’ WEB PEDAGOGICAL CONTENT KNOWLEDGE AND TEACHER SELFEFFICACY?. IOJET, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 3, 535–551. https://ajindex.com/articles/542383

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (6)

  1. Alvarez, C., Brown, C., & Nussbaum, M. (2011). Comparative study of netbooks and tablet PCs for fostering face-to-face collaborative learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(2), 834–844. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.11.008 Akcaoglu, M., Gumus, S., Bellibas, M. S., & Boyer, D. M. (2015). Policy, practice, and reality: Exploring a nation-wide technology implementation in Turkish schools. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 24(4), 477–491. doi:10.1080/1475939X.2014.899264 Akgün, F. (2013). Öğretmen adaylarının web pedagojik içerik bilgileri ve öğretmen özyeterlik algıları ile ilişkisi [Preservice teachers’ web pedagogical content knowledge and relationship between teachers’ perceptions of self-efficacy]. Trakya University Journal of Education, 3(1), 48–58.
  2. Angeli, C., & Valanides, N. (2009). Epistemological and methodological issues for the conceptualization, development, and assessment of ICT-TPCK: Advances in technology and pedagogical content knowledge (TPCK). Computers and Education, 52, 154-168.
  3. Arabacıoğlu, T., & Dursun, F. (2015). Öğretmen adaylarının web pedagojik içerik bilgisi algı düzeylerinin incelenmesi [Examination of the web pedagogical content knowledge of pre-service teachers in terms of some variables]. Kastamonu Education Journal, 23(1), 197–210.
  4. Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–215. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191 Bandura, A. (1986). The explanatory and predictive scope of self-efficacy theory. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 4(3), 359–373. doi:10.1521/jscp.1986.4.3.359 Brown, S. A. (2012). Seeing Web 2.0 in context: A study of academic perceptions. Internet and Higher Education, 15(1), 50–57.
  5. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2015). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı (21. bs.) [Data analysis handbook for social sciences] (21st ed.)]. Ankara:
  6. Pegem Academy Publishing. Cavin, R. (2008). Developing technological pedagogical content knowledge in preservice teachers through microteaching lesson study. Technology and Teacher Education Annual. 19(8), 5214. Chen, S. C., Yen, D. C., & Hwang, M. I. (2012). Factors influencing the continuance intention to the usage of Web 2.0: An empirical study. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(3), 933–941. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2011.12.014 Churchill, D. (2011). Web 2.0 in education: A study of the explorative use of blogs with a postgraduate class. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 48(2), 149– 158. Creswell, J. W., & Plano