Dergiler / IOJET / 2018 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 2

THE EVALUATION OF NATURE EDUCATION TRAINING

Dergi
IOJET
Sayfa
295–311
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

As a resultof this research, the participants’ expectations of the nature education projects were met andachieved the result of leaving it with a vision of a wide ecology.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Within the scope of “Nature Education” project by TUBITAK Science Department, whichaims to provide a wide ecology vision and teach the language of nature to young researchassistants from different departments, master and doctorate students and scoutleader teachers;in July, five years time the Project of “Ecology-Based Nature Education around GöksuValley and Delta” was carried out. 149 people participated in this program.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:A form consisting of 20questionnaires and 3 open-ended questions was used and the obtained data was analyzed.Codes were created in the direction of the answers given to the open-ended questions, and theopinions of the participants were interpreted by associating the generated codes.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:As a resultof this research, the participants’ expectations of the nature education projects were met andachieved the result of leaving it with a vision of a wide ecology.
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Within the scope of “Nature Education” project by TUBITAK Science Department, whichaims to provide a wide ecology vision and teach the language of nature to young researchassistants from different departments, master and doctorate students and scoutleader teachers;in July, five years time the Project of “Ecology-Based Nature Education around GöksuValley and Delta” was carried out. 149 people participated in this program. In the research,qualitative and quantitative research methods are used together. A form consisting of 20questionnaires and 3 open-ended questions was used and the obtained data was analyzed.Codes were created in the direction of the answers given to the open-ended questions, and theopinions of the participants were interpreted by associating the generated codes. As a resultof this research, the participants’ expectations of the nature education projects were met andachieved the result of leaving it with a vision of a wide ecology.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

AKBAŞLI, S. (2022). THE EVALUATION OF NATURE EDUCATION TRAINING. IOJET, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 2, 295–311. https://ajindex.com/articles/542371

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (13)

  1. Auer, M. A. (2008). Sensory perception, rationalism and outdoor environmental education. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 17(1), 6-12.
  2. Avcı, E., Özenir Su, Ö., Kurt, M., & Atik, S. (2015). TÜBİTAK 4004 Doğa eğitimi ve bilim okulları kapsamında ortaokul öğrencilerine yönelik gerçekleştirilen “Bizim deniz akdeniz” projesinin değerlendirilmesi [An assessment of the project entitled ‘The Mediterranean Sea: Our sea’ conducted with secondary education students within the scope of TUBITAK 4004 Nature education and science schools]. Amasya University Journal of the Faculty of Education, 4(2), 312-333.
  3. Balcı, A. (2005). Sosyal bilimlerde araştırma [Research in social sciences]. Ankara:
  4. Pegem A Yayıncılık. Berberoğlu Okur, E. (2015). Ekopedagoji temelli sınıf dışı çevre eğitiminin çevre farkındalığı üzerinde etkisi [The effect of ecopedagogy based out-of-school environmental education on environmental consciousness]. Journal of the Hasan Ali Yücel Faculty of Education 12(1), 67-81.
  5. Bogner, F. X. (1998). The influence of short-term outdoor ecology education on long-term variables of environmental perspective. The Journal of Environmental Education, 29(4), 17-30.
  6. Brookes, A. (2004). Astride a long-dead horse: Mainstream outdoor education theory and central curriculum problem. Australian Journal of Outdoor Education, 8(2), 22-33.
  7. Büyüköztürk, Ş., Çakmak, E. K., Akgün, Ö. E., Karadeniz, Ş., & Demirel, F. (2010). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri [Scientific research methods]. Ankara:
  8. Pegem Akademi. Carrier, S. J. (2009). Environmental education in the schoolyard: Learning styles and gender. The Journal of Environmental Education, 40(3), 2-12.
  9. Creswell, J. W. (2016). Karma yöntem araştırmalarına giriş [Introduction to mixed methods research] (Ed. Sözbilir, M). Ankara:
  10. Pegem Akademi Demirsoy, A. (2004). Son imparatora öğütler “Bilim toplumu”[Advices to the last emperor: Science society]. Ankara:
  11. Meteksan A. Ş. Dresner, M. G., & Gill, M. (1994). Environmental education summer nature camp. Journal of environmental education. The Journal of Environmental Education, 25(3), 35-41.
  12. Durmuş, Y., & Yapıcıoğlu, E. (2015, February). Kemaliye (Erzincan) ecology based nature education project in participants’ eyes. Paper presented at 7th World conference on educational sciences, (WCES-2015),
  13. Novotel Athens Convention Center, Athens, Greece. Erdoğan, M. (2011). Ekoloji temelli yaz doğa eğitimi programının ilköğretim öğrencilerinin çevreye yönelik bilgi, d