Dergiler / IOJET / 2018 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 4

THE EFFECTIVENESS OF PROJECT-BASED LEARNING ON SCIENCE EDUCATION: A META-ANALYSIS SEARCH

Dergi
IOJET
Sayfa
849–865
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Project-Based Learning can thus be deemed more effective compared to traditional learning approaches.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The present study aims to demonstrate, by means of a meta-analysis, the effectiveness of Project-Based Learning in the context of academic performance and various study characteristics.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:A total of 48 studies were included and, by means of the analyses conducted, the general effect size of Project-Based Learning in science education was found to be 1.063.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Project-Based Learning can thus be deemed more effective compared to traditional learning approaches.
🔬Tür:Literatür & Derleme Çalışması
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

The present study aims to demonstrate, by means of a meta-analysis, the effectiveness of Project-Based Learning in the context of academic performance and various study characteristics. For this purpose, the relevant literature was reviewed to identify studies using Project-Based Learning in the fields of physics, chemistry, biology, and science. Following the literature review, the study characteristics and the criteria for their inclusion were determined. A total of 48 studies were included and, by means of the analyses conducted, the general effect size of Project-Based Learning in science education was found to be 1.063. This is quite a large effect size by Cohen’s criteria and it shows that Project Based Learning is 86% more effective in science education compared to traditional learning approaches. Project-Based Learning was found to have a great effect size in different subjects (physics, chemistry, biology, and science), at different levels (primary, secondary, and tertiary), and with samples of various sizes (small, medium, and large). Project-Based Learning can thus be deemed more effective compared to traditional learning approaches.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

BALEMEN, N., KESKİN, M. Ö. (2022). THE EFFECTIVENESS OF PROJECT-BASED LEARNING ON SCIENCE EDUCATION: A META-ANALYSIS SEARCH. IOJET, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 4, 849–865. https://ajindex.com/articles/542370

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (7)

  1. Ayan, M. (2012). Proje tabanlı öğrenme yaklaşımının ilköğretim öğrencilerinin fen bilgisi dersi akademik başarı düzeyine etkisi. Türk Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 10(1), 167-183. Retrieved from http://www.tebd.gazi.edu.tr/index.php/tebd/article/view/104/91.
  2. Ayas, A. (1995). Fen bilimlerinde program geliştirme ve uygulama teknikleri üzerine bir çalışma: iki çağdaş yaklaşımın değerlendirilmesi. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 11, 149-155. Retrieved from http://www.efdergi.hacettepe.edu.tr/yonetim/icerik/makaleler/1231-published.pdf.
  3. Baran, M. (2007). Proje tabanlı öğrenme modelinin fizik öğretmenliği ikinci sınıf öğrencilerinin elektrostatik konusu başarısına ve fiziğe yönelik tutumlarına etkisi üzerine bir araştırma. Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Dicle Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Diyarbakır. Barron, B., Schwartz, D., Vye, N., Moore, A., Petrosino, L., & Bransford, J. (1998). Doing with understanding: lessons from research on problem and project-based learning. The Journal of the Learning Science. 7(3), 271-311. Retrieved from http://web.mit.edu/monicaru/Public/old%20stuff/For%20Dava/Grad%20Library.Data/PDF/Brigid_1998DoingwithUnderstandingLessonsfromResearchonProblemandProject-BasedLearning1896588801/Brigid_1998DoingwithUnderstandingLessonsfromResearchonProblem-andProject-BasedLearning.pdf.
  4. Bayındır, M. (2007). Nanoteknoloji hayatımızda. Bilim ve Ütopya Dergisi, 152, 12- 20. Cohen, J. (1977). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Routledge. Cooper, H., & Hedges, L. (1994). The handbook of research synthesis. New York: Russell Sage Foundation Çakıcı, Y. (2009). Fen eğitiminde bir önkoşul: Bilimin doğasını anlama. Marmara Üniversitesi Atatürk Eğitim Fakültesi Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 29, 57-74. Retrieved from http://edergi.marmara.edu.tr/maruaebd/article/view/1012001052/1012000903.
  5. Çeliker, H. D., & Balım, A. G. (2012). Effects of Project Based Learning of the “Solar System and Beyond: Space Puzzle” Unit on Student Achievement. Kuramsal Eğitimbilim Dergisi, 5(3), 254-277. Retrieved from http://www.keg.aku.edu.tr/index.php/anasayfa/article/view/215/104.
  6. Çil, A. (2005). Kimya eğitiminde proje tabanlı öğrenmenin incelenmesi ve öneriler. Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Hacettepe Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ankara.
  7. Dede, Y., & Yaman, S. (2003). Fen ve matematik eğitiminde proje çalışmalarının yeri, önemi ve değerlendirilmesi. Gazi Üniversitesi Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 23(1), 117-132. Retrieved from http://gefad.gazi.edu.tr/a