Dergiler / IOJET / 2018 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 2

THE INTEGRATION OF CORPUS INTO EFL SPEAKING INSTRUCTION: A STUDY OF LEARNER PERCEPTIONS

Dergi
IOJET
Sayfa
376–389
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The findings also point out somechallenges to overcome while using web-based concordancing in EFL instruction.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Recent years have shown a growing interest in using corpora in language instruction,enhancing data-driven learning (DDL) pedagogy by promoting the use of tools andtechniques of corpus linguistics in language classrooms.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:This paper describes asmall-scale study of corpus use in enhancing English speaking performance of EFL learnerswith a focus on their perceptions towards web-based concordancing.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The findings also point out somechallenges to overcome while using web-based concordancing in EFL instruction.
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Recent years have shown a growing interest in using corpora in language instruction,enhancing data-driven learning (DDL) pedagogy by promoting the use of tools andtechniques of corpus linguistics in language classrooms. Many studies have tested the impactof corpus tools in EFL writing or vocabulary instruction; however, little attention has beenpaid to the integration of corpus tools into EFL speaking instruction. This paper describes asmall-scale study of corpus use in enhancing English speaking performance of EFL learnerswith a focus on their perceptions towards web-based concordancing. Drawn in accordancewith convenience sampling procedures, the participants of the study were 31 university levelEFL learners who experienced DDL activities in the speaking classroom. Data collectedthrough a post-instruction perception questionnaire were analysed using descriptive statistics.Results indicatethat students benefited from concordance-based learning activities, and alsohold positive attitudes towards using it in learning speaking. The findings also point out somechallenges to overcome while using web-based concordancing in EFL instruction.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

SAVAN, Z., KIZIL, A. Ş. (2022). THE INTEGRATION OF CORPUS INTO EFL SPEAKING INSTRUCTION: A STUDY OF LEARNER PERCEPTIONS. IOJET, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 2, 376–389. https://ajindex.com/articles/542367

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (10)

  1. Akkoyunlu, A. N., & Kilimci, A. (2017). Application of corpus to translation teaching: Practice and perceptions. International Online Journal of Education and Teaching, 4(4), 369–396.
  2. Bernardini, S. (2002) Exploring new directions for discovery learning. In B. Kettemann & G. Marko (Eds.), Teaching and learning by doing corpus analysis (pp. 165-182). Amsterdam: Rodopi. Biber, D., & Finegan, E. (1988). Adverbial stance types in English. Discourse Processes, 11(1), 1–34.
  3. Boulton, A. (2009). Testing the limits of data-driven learning: Language proficiency and training. ReCALL, 21(1), 37-51.
  4. Brezina, V. (2009). “We only say we are certain when we are not”: A corpus-based study of epistemic stance. In J. Levická & R. Garabík (Eds.), NLP, corpus linguistics, corpus based grammar research (pp. 41–53). Brno: Tribun. Can, C. (2009). İkinci dil edinimi çalışmalarında bilgisayar destekli bir Türk öğrenici İngilizcesi derlemi: ICLE’nin bir altderlemi olarak TICLE. Dil Dergisi, 144(NisanMayıs-Haziran), 16–34.
  5. Cargill, M. & Adams, R. (2005). Learning discipline-specific research English for a world stage: A self-access concordancing tool? In Higher education in a changing world. Proceedings HERDSA Sydney 2005. http://conference.herdsa.org.au/2005/pdf/refereed/paper_202.pdf
  6. Chambers, A. (2005). Integrating corpus consultation in language studies. Language Learning & Technology, 9(2), 111-125.
  7. Cobb, T., & Boulton, A. (2015). Classroom applications of corpus analysis. In D. Biber & R. Reppen (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of English corpus linguistics (pp. 478-497).
  8. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  9. Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison K. (2000). Research methods in education (5th Edition). London: Routledge Falmer. De Cock, S. (2010). Spoken learner corpora and EFL teaching. In M. C. Campoy, B. BellésFortuño and M. L. Gea-Valor (Eds.), Corpus-based Approaches to English Language Teaching (pp. 123-137). London: Continuum. De Cock, S. 2004. Preferred sequences of words in NS and NNS speech. Belgian Journal of English Language and Literatures (BELL), New Series 2, 225–246.
  10. Efstathiadi, L. (2010). The use of epistemic markers as a means of hedging and boosting in the discourse of L1 and L2 speakers of Modern Greek: A corpus-based study in informal letter-writing. Themes in Science and Technology Education: Special Issue on ICT in Language Learning. Computer-Aided Language Analysis, Teaching and Learning: Αpproaches, Perspectives and Applications, 3(1–2), 181–206. Gabr