Dergiler / IOJET / 2019 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 1

A CRISS-CROSS OF FORCES: THE POWER RELATIONSHIP IN THE PROCESS OF CREATING THE CITIZENSHIP CURRICULUM IN

Dergi
IOJET
Sayfa
72–86
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

As the gatekeepers tasked with deciding which information to include andbeing faced with the intervention of numerous internal and external forces, the CurriculumCommittee sided with the critical theory and aimed to break the unreflective socialreproduction.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The citizenship curriculum used in Taiwan during the authoritarian period from 1949 to1987 sacrificed the individual for the national interest as a tool for political socialisation.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Inthe wake of democratisation since 1987, the curriculum has gradually been stripped of itsnationalist overtones which were designed to foster ‘informed citizens’ to facilitate those inpower.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:As the gatekeepers tasked with deciding which information to include andbeing faced with the intervention of numerous internal and external forces, the CurriculumCommittee sided with the critical theory and aimed to break the unreflective socialreproduction.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

The citizenship curriculum used in Taiwan during the authoritarian period from 1949 to1987 sacrificed the individual for the national interest as a tool for political socialisation. Inthe wake of democratisation since 1987, the curriculum has gradually been stripped of itsnationalist overtones which were designed to foster ‘informed citizens’ to facilitate those inpower. The increased stress on the reflective and critical capabilities of the individualreminds pupils to examine their positions and roles in society instead of mechanisticallyaccepting the existing social structure. This article sheds light on the intricate internalexternalpower relationships and differing views on critical pedagogy among curriculumdesigners. Interviewed curriculum designers hold that pluralistic ideologies should bepresented in the curriculum and then room should be left for students to deliberate or judgefor themselves. As the gatekeepers tasked with deciding which information to include andbeing faced with the intervention of numerous internal and external forces, the CurriculumCommittee sided with the critical theory and aimed to break the unreflective socialreproduction.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

HUNG, C. (2022). A CRISS-CROSS OF FORCES: THE POWER RELATIONSHIP IN THE PROCESS OF CREATING THE CITIZENSHIP CURRICULUM IN. IOJET, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 1, 72–86. https://ajindex.com/articles/542350

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (8)

  1. Althusser, L. (1971). Lenin and philosophy and other essays. London: Western Printing Services Ltd. Banks, J. A. (2001). Citizenship education and diversity implications for teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 52(1), 5-16.
  2. Bourdieu, P., & Passeron, J. C. (1977). Reproduction in education, culture and society. London: Sage. Chang, M. G. (2009). Zai-Tan Gong-Min Jiao-Yu: Fan-Si Gao-Zhong Gong-Min yu She-Hui Shin Ke Gang Zhi Zhi-Din (Citizenship education revisited: Reflections on the making of new 'Civic and Society' Curriculum). Bulletin of Civic and Moral Education, 20, 1- 31. Clark, J. R., & Schug, M. C. (2010). Morality of markets. In M. C. Schug & W. C. Wood (Eds.), Teaching Economics in Troubled Times: Theory and Practice for Secondary Social Studies (pp. 79-94).
  3. New York, NY: Routledge. Coulby, D. (2002). Beyond the national curriculum: Curricular centralism and cultural diversity in Europe and the USA. London: Routledge. Deng, Y. H. (2012). Bai-Nian lai Wo-Guo Guo Chu Zhong Gong-Min Jiao-Ke-Shu Yan-Bian yu Fa-Zhan (The evolution and development of citizenship education textbooks in high school in Republic of China over the century). In N. A. f. E. Research (Ed.), Kai-Juan- You-Yi: Jiao-Ke-Shu Qian-Zhan yu Hui-Gu (Enriches the mind: textbooks' retrospect and prospect). Taipei: National Academy for Educational Research. Doong, S. (2008). Taiwan's New Citizenship Curriculum: Changes and Challenges. Citizenship curriculum in Asia and the Pacific, 22(2), 43-60.
  4. Drew, C. J., Hardman, M. L., & Hart, A. W. (1996). Designing and conducting research - inquiry in education and social science. USA: Allyn & Bacon. Eagleton, T. (1991). Ideology: an introduction. London: Verso. Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punish. London: Random House of Canada. Freire, P. (2003).
  5. Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York, NY: Continuum International Publishing Group. Geuss, R. (1993). The idea of a critical theory: Habermas and the Frankfurt School. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  6. Giroux, H. A. (1981a). Hegemony, resistance, and the paradox of educational reform. Interchange, 12(2), 3-26.
  7. Giroux, H. A. (1981b). Ideology, culture & the process of schooling. London: Falmer Press Ltd. Gutter, M. S., & Garrison, S. (2010). The role of personal finance in education. In M. C. Schug & W. C. Wood (Eds.), Teaching economics in troubled times: Theory and practice for secondary social studies (pp. 122-134).
  8. New York, NY: Routledge. Heater, D. (2004). A history of educati