KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / IOJET / 2019 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 2

NON-NATIVE ENGLISH TEACHERS’ PERCEPTIONS ABOUT USING TURKISH (L1) IN EFL CLASSROOMS: A CASE STUDY

Ayten YILTANLILAR
Sibel ERSEL KAYMAKAMOĞLU
Dergi
IOJET
Sayfa
327–337
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Overall, the majority of theteachers supported the use of Turkish whereas only one teacher had the opposite viewemphasizing that students can become dependent on L1 help which has a high possibility ofinhibiting learners from target language acquisition.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:This study investigated 5 non-native English teachers’ perceptions on Turkish (L1) use inEnglish language (L2) classrooms in the English Preparatory School context of EuropeanUniversity of Lefke in the Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus (TRNC).
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Gathered data were analyzed to explore theparticipants’ beliefs and classroom practices regarding the necessity of using L1.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Overall, the majority of theteachers supported the use of Turkish whereas only one teacher had the opposite viewemphasizing that students can become dependent on L1 help which has a high possibility ofinhibiting learners from target language acquisition.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

This study investigated 5 non-native English teachers’ perceptions on Turkish (L1) use inEnglish language (L2) classrooms in the English Preparatory School context of EuropeanUniversity of Lefke in the Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus (TRNC). The participantswere interviewed by using a semi-structured interview and observed by administering apredetermined observation checklist. Gathered data were analyzed to explore theparticipants’ beliefs and classroom practices regarding the necessity of using L1. Theparticipant non-native English teachers’ views regarding the reasons of using Turkish (L1)were also explored. The results of the study revealed that the teachers had neutral perceptionsabout benefiting from Turkish (L1) in their foreign language classes and underscored a placefor Turkish (L1) in English (L2) classrooms. In other words, the majority of the participantsdid not reject Turkish use; however, due to some restrictions such as English mediumeducation system in the teachers' workplace, nationality factors, and teachers' own teachingphilosophy brought some different dimensions to this process. Overall, the majority of theteachers supported the use of Turkish whereas only one teacher had the opposite viewemphasizing that students can become dependent on L1 help which has a high possibility ofinhibiting learners from target language acquisition.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

YILTANLILAR, A., KAYMAKAMOĞLU, S. E. (2022). NON-NATIVE ENGLISH TEACHERS’ PERCEPTIONS ABOUT USING TURKISH (L1) IN EFL CLASSROOMS: A CASE STUDY. IOJET, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 2, 327–337. https://ajindex.com/articles/542332

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (12)

  1. Atkinson, D. (1987). The mother tongue in the classroom: A neglected resource? ELT journal, 41(4), 241-247.
  2. Auerbach, E. R. (1993). Reexamining English only in the ESL classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 27(1), 9-32.
  3. Bensen, H. & Çavuşoğlu, Ç. (2013). Teachers’ perspectives on and uses of code- switching in adult EFL classrooms. Paper presented at the 1st. Oxford ELT Conference, April 26-27, 2013,
  4. Kalkanlı, North Cyprus. Carless, D. (2007). Student use of the mother tongue in the task-based classroom. ELT Journal, 62(4), 331-338.
  5. Cenoz, J. (2008). The acquisition of pragmatic competence and multilingualism in foreign language contexts. In Intercultural language use and language learning (pp. 123-140).
  6. Springer, Dordrecht. Cook, G. (2007, April). Unmarked improvement: values, facts, and first languages. In IATEFL Conference, Aberdeen, 18-20.
  7. Cook, V. (2001). Using the first language in the classroom. Canadian Modern Language Review, 57(3), 402-423.
  8. Dean, M. (1994). Critical and effective histories: Foucault’s methods and historical sociology. London: Routledge. Dendrinos, B. (2006). Mediation in communication, language teaching and testing. Journal of Applied Linguistics, 22, 9-35.
  9. Deller, S., & Rinvolucri, M. (2002). Using the mother tongue: Making the most of the learner's language. Delta. Eldridge, J. (1996). Code-switching in a Turkish secondary school. ELT journal, 50(4), 303- 311. Ellis, R. (2008). A typology of written corrective feedback types. ELT Journal, 63(2), 97- 107. Harbord, J. (1992). The use of the mother tongue in the classroom. ELT Journal, 46(4), 350- 355. Harmer, J. (2001). The practice of English language teaching. London/New York. İyitoğlu, O. (2016). Code switching from L’ to L1 in EFL classrooms. Croatian Journal of Education, 18(1), 257-289.
  10. Kafes, H. (2011). A neglected resource or an overvalued illusion: L1 use in the foreign language classroom. International Journal on New Trends in Education and Their Implications, 2(2), 128-140.
  11. Kaynardağ, A. Y. (2017). Shall we forget about L1 when teaching English?. TÖMER Dil Dergisi, (167.2). Kellerman, E. (1995). Crosslinguistic influence: Transfer to nowhere? Annual review of applied linguistics, 15, 125-150.
  12. Larsen-Freeman, D. (2011). Empowering the language learner: A discussion with Diane Larsen. Freeman. [Lecture]. Lecture presented at a continuing education workshop at the New School for General Studies. New York, NY. Mouhanna, M. (2009). Re-examining the role of L1 in the EFL classroom. UGR