KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / IOJET / 2019 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 1

TOWARDS A CONTINUUM FROM KNOW-HOW TO SHOW-HOW FOR DEVELOPING EFL STUDENT-TEACHERS’ ASSESSMENT LITERACY

Nurdan KAVAKLI
Sezen ARSLAN
Dergi
IOJET
Sayfa
223–232
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Some practical recommendations and implications for teachereducation are also listed in tow.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:It mushrooms as an unerring fact that that assessment literacy has been a focus of interestas one of the major professional requirements of a teacher.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:In this context, the Assessment Literacy Survey developed byVolante and Fazio (2007) together with the student questionnaire of the European Network ofLanguage Testing and Assessment (ENLTA) which was developed in 2004 are exploited tocollect data.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Some practical recommendations and implications for teachereducation are also listed in tow.
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:2007 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

It mushrooms as an unerring fact that that assessment literacy has been a focus of interestas one of the major professional requirements of a teacher. Correlatively, there are somemanifold standards for assessment and measures for assessment literacy. This study, hereat,aims to unearth the prospective English as a Foreign Language (henceforth EFL) teachers’levels of assessment literacy. In this context, the Assessment Literacy Survey developed byVolante and Fazio (2007) together with the student questionnaire of the European Network ofLanguage Testing and Assessment (ENLTA) which was developed in 2004 are exploited tocollect data. The participants are thirty-six senior students from the department of EnglishLanguage Teaching (henceforth ELT) at a state university in Turkey. Fundamentally, the preserviceteachers’ utilization of the assessment approaches, and their understanding ofunderlying principles are at the major axis. As a result, it is reported that prospective EFLteachers are aware of the concept of assessment literacy though they perceive themselves asnot adequately qualified. At the very same, practicum courses in which they enroll do notsatisfactorily meet their expectations in developing their assessment skills. Similarly, theyhave a judicious amount of practical knowledge on different types of assessment approachesalthough they are mindful of the fact that in-class practices are to be laced with various kindsof assessment applications. Some practical recommendations and implications for teachereducation are also listed in tow.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

KAVAKLI, N., ARSLAN, S. (2022). TOWARDS A CONTINUUM FROM KNOW-HOW TO SHOW-HOW FOR DEVELOPING EFL STUDENT-TEACHERS’ ASSESSMENT LITERACY. IOJET, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 1, 223–232. https://ajindex.com/articles/542325

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (9)

  1. Allen, D. D., & Flippo, R. F. (2002). Alternative assessment in the preparation of literacy educators: Responses from students. Reading Psychology, 23, 15-26.
  2. Brookhart, S. M. (1999). The art and science of classroom assessment: The missing part of pedagogy. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report, 27(1). Washington DC: The George Washington University. Brookhart, S. M. (2001). Successful students' formative and summative uses of assessment information. Assessment in Education Principles, Policy and Practice, 8(2), 153-169.
  3. Campbell, C., & Collins, V. L. (2007). Identifying essential topics in general and special education introductory assessment textbooks. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 26(1), 9-18.
  4. Campbell, C., Murphy, J. A., & Holt, J. K. (2002, October). Psychometric analysis of an assessment literacy instrument: Applicability to preservice teachers. Paper presented at the meeting of the Mid-Western Educational Research Association, Columbus, OH. Cheng, L. (2001). An investigation of ESL/EFL teachers’ classroom assessment practices. Language Testing Update, 29, 53-83.
  5. Coombe, C., Troudi, S., & Al-Hamly, M. (2012). Foreign and second language teacher assessment literacy: Issues, challenges and recommendations. In C. Coombe, P. Davidson, B. O’Sullivan, & S. Stoynoff (eds.), The Cambridge Guide to Second Language Assessment (pp. 20-29). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  6. Cowan, J. (1988). Struggling with student self-assessment, In D. J. Boud (ed.), Developing student autonomy in learning (pp. 192-210). London: Kogan Page. Fetter, W. R. (2003, January). A conceptual model for integrating field experiences, professional development schools, and performance assessment in a world of NCATE 2000. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Association of Colleges of Teacher Education, New Orleans, LA. Graham, P. (2005). Classroom-based assessment: Changing knowledge and practice through preservice teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21, 607-621.
  7. Hargreaves, A., Earl, L., & Schmidt, M. (2002). Perspectives on alternative assessment reform. American Educational Research Journal, 39(1), 69-95.
  8. Hauge, T. E. (2006). Portfolios and ICT as a means of professional learning in teacher education. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 32, 22-36.
  9. Herman, J., & Dorr-Bremme, D. (1982). Assessing students: Teachers’ routine practices and reasoning. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New