KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / IOJET / 2019 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 4

PROJECT SCHOOLS AS A SCHOOL-BASED MANAGEMENT MODEL

Mert BASTAS
Ahmet KOÇ
Dergi
IOJET
Sayfa
923–942
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

There seems to be a total increase in teachers’ efficiency inaddition to higher teacher performances, due to the teams built under the leadership of schoolprincipals.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Education is a very expensive investment with high opportunity costs.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Efforts for attainingschools with intended quality top the agenda of world nations’ education plans and programs.Turkish Ministry of National Education has also made several reforms to increase the qualityof education.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:There seems to be a total increase in teachers’ efficiency inaddition to higher teacher performances, due to the teams built under the leadership of schoolprincipals.
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:2018-2019 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Education is a very expensive investment with high opportunity costs. Efforts for attainingschools with intended quality top the agenda of world nations’ education plans and programs.Turkish Ministry of National Education has also made several reforms to increase the qualityof education. The latest reform made in the field of educational management model has beenthe project schools developed with various innovations. Including school principals into theteachers’ selection process can be regarded as the new aspect of school-based management.Sharing authority to choose teachers with school principals is a brand new approach for theTurkish National Education system. This study aims to detect reflections of project schools’structural and managerial features in practice and depends on the qualitative method,including observation and interviewing techniques. The research sample comprises 15 ImamHatip High Schools located in Istanbul in 2018-2019 Education Year and 23 teachersworking in these schools. “Semi-structured Interview Questionnaire” was utilized for scaling.According to research results, we conclude that teachers in project schools are satisfied withthe new education model. There seems to be a total increase in teachers’ efficiency inaddition to higher teacher performances, due to the teams built under the leadership of schoolprincipals.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

BASTAS, M., KOÇ, A. (2022). PROJECT SCHOOLS AS A SCHOOL-BASED MANAGEMENT MODEL. IOJET, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 4, 923–942. https://ajindex.com/articles/542307

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (11)

  1. Bastas, M., & Öztuğ, Ö. (2012). Öğretmenlerin örgütsel adalet konusundaki algılarının örgütsel bağlılıkları üzerindeki etkisi. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, (2), 125–133.
  2. Bogler, R., & Somech, A. (2004). Influence of teacher empowerment on teachers’ organizational commitment, professional commitment and organizational citizenship behavior in schools. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20(3), 277–289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2004.02.003
  3. Caldwell, B. (1994).
  4. School-based management. Oxford, UK: Pergamon. In T. Husen, & T. Neville (Eds.). International encyclopedia of education. Caldwell, B. J. (2005). School-based management education policy series. Paris, Fransa: UNESCO. Chen, C.-H., & Yang, Y.-C. (2019). Revisiting the effects of project-based learning on students’ academic achievement: A meta-analysis investigating moderators. Educational Research Review, 26, 71–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2018.11.001
  5. Cybulski, T. G., Hoy, W. K., & Sweetland, S. R. (2005). The roles of collective efficacy of teachers and fiscal efficiency in student achievement. Journal of Educational Administration, 43(5), 439–461. https://doi.org/10.1108/09578230510615224
  6. Day, C., Gu, Q., & Sammons, P. (2016). The impact of leadership on student outcomes: How successful school leaders use transformational and instructional strategies to make a difference. Educational Administration Quarterly, 52(2), 221–258. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X15616863
  7. DiPaola, M. F., & Hoy, W. K. (2005). Organizational citizenship of faculty and achievement of high school students. The High School Journal, 88(3), 35–44. https://doi.org/10.1353/hsj.2005.0002
  8. Donohoo, J. (2018). Collective teacher efficacy research: Productive patterns of behaviour and other positive consequences. Journal of Educational Change, 19(3), 323–345. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-018-9319-2
  9. Dunlap, D. M., & Goldman, P. (1991). Rethinking power in schools. Educational Administration Quarterly, 27(1), 5–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X91027001002
  10. Edwards Jr., D. B., & DeMatthews, D. (2014). Historical trends in educational decentralization in the United States and developing countries: A periodization and comparison in the Post-WWII context. Education Policy Analysis Archives. https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.v22n40.2014
  11. Elma, C. (2002). Eğitim ve yönetimde yeni yaklaşımlar: Eğitim kurumlarında takım Çalışması. (33). Ganimian, A. J. (2016). Why do some school-based management reforms survive while ot