Dergiler / IOJET / 2020 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 1

REFLECTIVE JOURNALS AS SELF-ASSESSMENT TO PROMOTE STUDENTS’ WRITING SKILL

Dergi
IOJET
Sayfa
48–58
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Andthe research result reveals as follows; (1) Reflective Journals is more effective thantraditional writing method to promote students’ writing. (2) Students have high motivationhave better writing skill than those low motivation students. (3) There is an interactionbetween teaching assessment and students’ motivation to teach writing.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:This research is experimental research with a 2x2 factorial design.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:There were 32 students in each experimental andcontrol class, so the total sample was 64 students.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Andthe research result reveals as follows; (1) Reflective Journals is more effective thantraditional writing method to promote students’ writing. (2) Students have high motivationhave better writing skill than those low motivation students. (3) There is an interactionbetween teaching assessment and students’ motivation to teach writing.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

This research is experimental research with a 2x2 factorial design. In this study, theresearcher took students of two classes as a sample of the research, one for the experimentalgroup (EG) and the control group (CG). There were 32 students in each experimental andcontrol class, so the total sample was 64 students. Both of these classes were considered tohave English knowledge and writing skill at the same level. The samples of the experimentgroup taught by using a reflective journal and the control class taught by using the traditionalwriting method. And all these samples are viewed from students’ motivation. The sample wasobtained by implementing a cluster random sampling technique. Each class was divided intotwo groups each of which consisted of 16 high motivation students and 16 low motivationstudents. the researcher used Multifactor Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) 2x2 to know theeffects of the independent variables Reflective Journals and traditional writing method andattributive variable (Students’ Motivation) toward the dependent variable (Writing skill). Andthe research result reveals as follows; (1) Reflective Journals is more effective thantraditional writing method to promote students’ writing. (2) Students have high motivationhave better writing skill than those low motivation students. (3) There is an interactionbetween teaching assessment and students’ motivation to teach writing.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

NI'MA, H. N. A., SUMARDI, S., TARJANA, S. S. (2022). REFLECTIVE JOURNALS AS SELF-ASSESSMENT TO PROMOTE STUDENTS’ WRITING SKILL. IOJET, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 1, 48–58. https://ajindex.com/articles/542292

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (8)

  1. Brown, D. (2004). Language assessment principles and classroom practices. New Work: Pearson Longman. Brown, H. D. (2007). Principles of language learning and teaching. (5th ed.). New York: Pearson Bingham, G., Holbrook, T., Meyers, L. E. (2010). Using self-assessment in elementary classrooms. Phi Delta Kappan, 91(5), 59-62. Retrieved from http;//0proquest. Umi.com.lilac.une.edu/ Boud, D., & Associates (2010). Assessment 2020: Seven propositions for assessment reform in higher education. Sydney: Australian Learning and Teaching Council. Cassidy, S. (2007). Assessing 'inexperienced' students' ability to self-assess: Exploring links with learning style and academic personal control. Article in Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 32(3), 313-330.
  2. Edwards, A. Weistein, C. Goestz, E. Alexander, P (2014). Learning and Study Strategies: Issues in assessment, instruction, and evaluation. Elsevier. Ghaith, G. (2002). The problem of teaching Writing. American University of Beirut (Online). Retrieved from: http://nadabs.tripod.com/writing/.
  3. Harmer, J. (2004). The practice of English language teaching. Oxford: Longman Hamp,; Heasley. (2006). Study writing: A course in written English for academic purposes. Cambridge University. Hiemstra, R. (2001). Uses and benefits of journal writing. Special Issue: Promoting Journal Writing in Adult Education, 2001(90), 19-26.
  4. Hyland, K. (2011).
  5. Second language writing. New York, Cambridge University Press.
  6. Hyun, J. Ediger, R; Lee, D. (2017). Students' satisfaction on their learning process in active learning and traditional classrooms. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 29(1), 108-118 2017
  7. Lai, E.R. (2011). Critical thinking: A literature review. Research report. Pearson Publication. Mlynarczyk, R. W. (2013). Conversation of the mind: The uses of journal writing for secondlanguage learners. Routledge. McMillan, J.H. & Hearn, J. (2008). Student self-assessment: The key to stronger student motivation and Hhgher achievement. International Journal: ERIC Institute of Education Sciences, 87(1), 40-49.
  8. Munns, G & Woodward, H. (2006). Students engagement and students self-assessment: The real framework. London: Routledge Nunan, D. (2003). Practical English language teaching. Singapore: Mc. Graw Hill O’Malley, J & Pierce, L. (1996). Authentic assessment for English language learners: Practical approach for teachers. New York: Addison-Wesley. Oshima, A & Hogue, A. (2007). Introduction to academic writi