Dergiler / IOJET / 2020 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 2

THE EFFECT OF THE EXPLICIT STRATEGY TRAINING ON LEARNER AUTONOMY

Dergi
IOJET
Sayfa
233–246
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Furthermore, the strategy training provided opportunities for thestudents to reflect on their learning methods, classroom activities along with their classroombehaviour and how learning could be made easier.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The study aimed to investigate the effect of the explicit strategy training on the students’autonomy in foreign language learning and to seek for their attitudes towards such training.The research lasted for fourteen weeks at the 2018-2019 academic year.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:TheSALCQ was administered twice first at the beginning and secondly at the end of the trainingso as to identify any increases in the learners’ capacity of autonomy.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Furthermore, the strategy training provided opportunities for thestudents to reflect on their learning methods, classroom activities along with their classroombehaviour and how learning could be made easier.
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:2018-2019 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

The study aimed to investigate the effect of the explicit strategy training on the students’autonomy in foreign language learning and to seek for their attitudes towards such training.The research lasted for fourteen weeks at the 2018-2019 academic year. Data were collectedthrough the Course Evaluation Questionnaire, the Student Autonomous Learning CapacityQuestionnaire, the learner diary, the researcher's diary and semi-structured interviews. TheSALCQ was administered twice first at the beginning and secondly at the end of the trainingso as to identify any increases in the learners’ capacity of autonomy. The results revealed thatthe strategy training helped learners enhance their capacity of autonomy in some factors. Thestudy disclosed that the students held positive attitudes towards the training as it providedopportunities for the students to employ LLSs more effectively, deal with learning relatedproblems, enhance self-directed out of class activities, to develop language learning skills andto monitor their learning process in an effective way by raising their awareness of strategyuse and self-confidence. Furthermore, the strategy training provided opportunities for thestudents to reflect on their learning methods, classroom activities along with their classroombehaviour and how learning could be made easier.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

KULUŞAKLI, E., YUMRU, H. (2022). THE EFFECT OF THE EXPLICIT STRATEGY TRAINING ON LEARNER AUTONOMY. IOJET, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 2, 233–246. https://ajindex.com/articles/542279

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (11)

  1. Balcikanli, C. (2010). ‘Learner autonomy in language learning: student teachers’ beliefs’. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 90-203.
  2. Benson, P. (2001). Autonomy in language learning. London: Pearson. Breen, M. P., & Mann, S. J. (1997). Shooting arrows at the sun: Perspectives on a pedagogy for autonomy (Vol. 132-149). London: Longman: Autonomy and independence language learning. Ceylan N. O. (2015). ‘Fostering Learner Autonomy’. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, vol. 199, pp. 85 – 93 Chamot, A.U., & O’Malley, J.M. (1996). Implementing the Cognitive Academic Language Learning Approach (CALLA). In R. Oxford (Ed.), Language Learning Strategies Around the World: Cross-cultural Perspectives (pp. 167-174). Manoa: University of Hawaii Press.
  3. Channuan, P., & Wasanasomsithi, P. (2012). ‘Promoting learner autonomy through an extensive reading program among second year undergraduate students of Naresuan University’, E-Journal for Researching Teachers, vol. 5, pp. 1-23.
  4. Cohen, A. C. (2002). ‘Learning style and language strategy preferences: The roles of the teacher and the learner in ELT’. English Education, vol. 57, no. 4, pp. 41-55.
  5. Cohen, A.D. (1998). Strategies in Learning and Using a Second Language. Addison Wesley Longman Limited. Course, S. (2017). ‘Reading strategies and reading diaries for autonomous learning in a Turkish context’. The Reading Matrix: An International Online Journal, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 124-144.
  6. Chamot, A.U., & O’Malley, J.M. (1996). Implementing the Cognitive Academic Language Learning Approach (CALLA). In R. Oxford (Ed.), Language Learning Strategies Around the World: Cross-cultural Perspectives (pp. 167-174). Manoa: University of Hawaii Press.
  7. Chamot, A.U. and Robbins, J. (2006). Helping struggling students become good language learners. National Capital Language Resource Center. Collins, J. (2009). ‘Lifelong learning in the 21st century and beyond’. RadioGraphics, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 613-622.
  8. Cotterall, S. (1995). ‘Readiness for autonomy: investigating learner beliefs’. System, vol. 2, pp. 195-205.
  9. Cotterall, S. (1995). ‘Readiness for autonomy: investigating learner beliefs’. System, vol. 2, pp. 195-205.
  10. Çakici, D. (2015). ‘Autonomy in language teaching and learning process’. İnönü University Journal of the Faculty of Education, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 31-42.
  11. Çakıcı, D. (2017). ‘An overview of metacognitive strategies in reading comprehension skill’. International Journal of Social Science, No. 57, pp. 67-8