Dergiler / IOJET / 2020 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 1

A QUANTITATIVE STUDY OF TURKISH EFL LEARNERS’ PERCEPTIONS ABOUT CRITICAL THINKING DISPOSITIONS

Dergi
IOJET
Sayfa
127–139
Yayın Tarihi
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Implications are included for critical thinking dispositions to enhance academic/business English language courses in Turkey.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:This study is an attempt to determine learners’ attitudes and perceptions about critical thinking dispositions and their achievement levels in Business English classes.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The participants (N=91, 61 males and 30 females) are second- and third-year undergraduate students from Management and Information Systems department enrolled in the Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences at a state university in Turkey, who have taken the Business English Course during the 2018-2019 academic year, fall term.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Implications are included for critical thinking dispositions to enhance academic/business English language courses in Turkey.
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:2018-2019 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

This study is an attempt to determine learners’ attitudes and perceptions about critical thinking dispositions and their achievement levels in Business English classes. The participants (N=91, 61 males and 30 females) are second- and third-year undergraduate students from Management and Information Systems department enrolled in the Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences at a state university in Turkey, who have taken the Business English Course during the 2018-2019 academic year, fall term. The research was designed as a quantitative study. For the measurement of learners’ tendency towards critical thinking dispositions, the California Critical Thinking Disposition Inventory (CCTDI), a survey instrument (51 questions, 6 subscales) adapted and translated into Turkish by Kökdemir (2003) was employed as a data collection tool. These subscales are about truth-seeking, open mindedness, analyticity, systematicity, critical thinking, self-confidence and inquisitiveness. At the end of the semester, for the English achievement level of learners, final exam results were taken into consideration and evaluated. The data collected were analyzed through SPSS 22.0. Findings indicate that the relationship between students’ critical thinking dispositions (CTD hereafter) and the final scores are not statistically significant. Also, students’ level of education does not affect the tendency of the participants in terms of CTD. However, it can be said that female students are more successful than male students in academic English course. Implications are included for critical thinking dispositions to enhance academic/business English language courses in Turkey.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

YÜKSELİR, C. (2022). A QUANTITATIVE STUDY OF TURKISH EFL LEARNERS’ PERCEPTIONS ABOUT CRITICAL THINKING DISPOSITIONS. IOJET, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 1, 127–139. https://ajindex.com/articles/542230

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (14)

  1. Afshar, H. S., Rahimi, A., & Rahimi, M. (2014). Instrumental motivation, critical thinking, autonomy and academic achievement of Iranian EFL learners. Issues in Educational Research, 24(3), 281. Akbıyık, C. ve Seferoğlu, S. S. (2002). Eleştirel düşünme eğilimleri ve akademik başarı. Çukurova Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 2(32), 90-99.
  2. Alagözlü, N. (2007). Critical thinking and voice in EFL writing. Asian EFL Journal, 9(3), 118- 136. Alagözlü, N., & Süzer, S. S. (2010). Language and cognition: Is critical thinking a myth in Turkish educational system? Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 782-786.
  3. Astleitner, H. 2002. Teaching critical thinking online. Journal of Instructional Psychology 29(2), 53–70.
  4. Atkinson, D. (1997). A critical approach to critical thinking in TESOL. TESOL quarterly, 31(1), 71-94.
  5. Bedir, H. (2013). Reading and critical thinking skills in ELT classes of Turkish students. World Applied Sciences Journal, 21(10), 1436-1439. Defining Critical Thinking. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://www.criticalthinking.org/pages/index-of-articles/defining-critical-thinking/766 on May 10, 2019.
  6. Elekaei, A., Faramazi, S., & Tabrizi, H. (2016). Autonomy, critical thinking and listening comprehension ability of Iranian EFL learners. International Journal of Applied Linguistics & English Literature, 5(2), 40-48.
  7. Enciso, O. L. U., Enciso, D. S. U., & Daza, M. D. P. V. (2017). Critical thinking and its importance in education: Some reflections. Rastros Rostros, 19(34), 78-89.
  8. Facione, P.A., Sánchez, (Giancarlo) C.A., Facione, N.C., & Gainen, J., (1995). The disposition toward critical thinking. Journal of General Education, 44(1),1-25.
  9. Floyd, C. B. (2011). Critical thinking in a second language. Higher Education Research & Development, 30(3), 289-302.
  10. Freire, P. (1973). Education for Critical Consciousness. New York: The Seabury Press.
  11. Freire, P. (1974). Pedagogy of the Oppressed. New York: The Seabury Press.
  12. Genç, G. (2017). The relationship between academic achievement, reading habits and critical thinking dispositions of Turkish tertiary level EFL learners. Educational Research Quarterly, 41(2), 43-73.
  13. Halpern, D.F. (1999). Teaching for critical thinking: Helping college students develop the skills and dispositions of a critical thinker. New Direction Teaching and Learning, 1999(80), 69–74.
  14. Kabeel, A. R., & Eisa, S. A. E. M. M. (2016). The correlation of critical thinking disposition and approaches to learning among baccalaureate nursing